★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1829 April 3<lb/>Petition</head> <p><note>Supplement<lb/>§.2. Elucidation<lb/>Concluding Note?</note></p> <p><note>Right and Wrong<lb/>pronounced by 5 Judges</note></p> <p><note>11<lb/>Objections calumny<lb/>personality answered</note></p> <p><add>Calumny! calumny!</add> Personality! personality! <del>how horrible</del> Oh <gap/><lb/>herein! Blush blush though sun! stand back though rapid<lb/>decree. Easter, <gap/>, <gap/> all commencing <gap/></p> <p>And into chaos pulverise the world: For Bombadantula<lb/>received a blow and — — — — <gap/></p> <p>Noman has the world of any such pulveridation.<lb/><del><gap/></del> Calumny, not any: for if the affection this much<lb/>not a single one of them is there the talk of which is not<lb/>invariably notorious: not a single one of them to which <add>a <gap/> of</add> <lb/>any one of the learned persons in question will venture to set<lb/>his name</p> <p>Personality not any: why? Because what is <add>his</add> <gap/><lb/>of these individuals is predicted not merely of<lb/>these same individuals but of these in common with every<lb/>other individual by whom the same situation ever has been<lb/>or is likely ever to be fitted</p> <p>I have not so much as looked at the causes</p> <!-- line in pencil across the page --><p><note>12<lb/>If instead of four<lb/>there were but one<lb>that one would have<lb/>greater effect as to<lb/>probative force than<lb/>all four together</note></p> <p>If instead of all four names there was but one<lb/>single name, that one name, whichever it was would operate<lb/>in my mind in respect of probable <del>force it</del> will <gap/><lb/>veracity and rectitude of the <gap/> opinion with incomparably<lb/>greater probative force than that of all four: Why? Because<lb/>his would be individual responsibility: effective responsibility, <gap/> <gap/> to the censure of the public opinion<lb/>tribunal: in a word reputation in some <gap/> at state</p> <p>Before <gap/> <gap/> a recent <add>reformed</add> <gap/> by an <gap/><lb/><gap/> of literary mind in which single seated judicatories<lb?>and <gap/> seated judicatories are brought forth in the same<lb/>breath and placed on a<gap/> with each other in respect<lb?>of <gap/> to adoption a given mass of experience with twelve<lb/>times that mass not to speak of the <gap/> as where in<lb/>respect of appropriate aptitude!</p> <p>Half <del>will</del> <add>worth</add> more than the whole, is a paradise uttered <add>sung on</add><lb/>by a Garden Pest. a fifth part worth more than the whole is<lb/>a <gap/> <del>exemplified here as</del> <gap/> not sung <del>but</del> indeed<lb/><add>but</add><lb/><!-- continues in the margin -->but what is more <add>material<a/dd. exemplified<lb/>and verified</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1829 April 3
Petition
Supplement
§.2. Elucidation
Concluding Note?
Right and Wrong
pronounced by 5 Judges
11
Objections calumny
personality answered
Calumny! calumny! Personality! personality! how horrible Oh
herein! Blush blush though sun! stand back though rapid
decree. Easter, , all commencing
And into chaos pulverise the world: For Bombadantula
received a blow and — — — —
Noman has the world of any such pulveridation.
Calumny, not any: for if the affection this much
not a single one of them is there the talk of which is not
invariably notorious: not a single one of them to which a of
any one of the learned persons in question will venture to set
his name
Personality not any: why? Because what is his
of these individuals is predicted not merely of
these same individuals but of these in common with every
other individual by whom the same situation ever has been
or is likely ever to be fitted
I have not so much as looked at the causes
12
If instead of four
there were but one<lb>that one would have
greater effect as to
probative force than
all four together
If instead of all four names there was but one
single name, that one name, whichever it was would operate
in my mind in respect of probable force it will
veracity and rectitude of the opinion with incomparably
greater probative force than that of all four: Why? Because
his would be individual responsibility: effective responsibility, to the censure of the public opinion
tribunal: in a word reputation in some at state
Before a recent reformed by an
of literary mind in which single seated judicatories<lb?>and seated judicatories are brought forth in the same
breath and placed on a with each other in respect<lb?>of to adoption a given mass of experience with twelve
times that mass not to speak of the as where in
respect of appropriate aptitude!
Half will worth more than the whole, is a paradise uttered sung on
by a Garden Pest. a fifth part worth more than the whole is
a exemplified here as not sung but indeed
but
but what is more <add>material<a/dd. exemplified
and verified
|
Identifier: | JB/081/404/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-04-03 |
11-12 |
||
|
081 |
petition for justice |
||
|
404 |
petitions |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
street & co |
||
|
antonio alcala galiano |
|||
|
26191 |
|||
