JB/091/039/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:53, 21 February 2023

18 Decr 1806
Scotch Reform Evidence To Ld Grenville

Lawyer. Oh yes, I thought how it was I see – I see: You are for Parliamentary
Reform, are not you?

Non Lawyer. No: nor against it neither: I never
thought anything about the matter: and with your leave
on the present occasion at least with which it has nothing at all to do,
I should be glad to save myself the trouble.⊞ ⊞ If you have anything
to say about
Parliamentary Reform,
there's King or Cartwright
read for you. The question
we you and I are upon is – not who shall govern us?, but to
whose benefit we shall be governed?

Lawyer. – Well come, as you and I are friends – and
you seem not inclined to stickle for wile and speculative
theories, I will tell you let you see fairly and honestly

Identifier: \| JB/091/039/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91.
Date_1	1806-12-18	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	091	Main Headings	scotch reform
Folio number	039	Info in main headings field	scotch reform to ld grenville
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c3
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	iping 1804
Marginals		Paper Producer	bernardino rivadavia
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1804
Notes public		ID Number	29035
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/091/039/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
+<p><!-- pencil -->18 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1806<lb/>
-''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
+<!-- pencil --><head>Scotch Reform  <del>Evidence</del>  To L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Grenville</head></p>
+<p>Lawyer.  Oh yes, <add>I thought how it was</add> I see – I see:  You are for Parliamentary<lb/>
+Reform, are not you?</p>
+<p>Non Lawyer.  No: nor against it neither:  I never<lb/>
+thought anything about the matter:  and with your leave<lb/>
+on the present occasion at least with which it has nothing at all to do,<lb/>
+I should be glad to save myself the trouble.<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> If you have anything<lb/>
+to say about<lb/>
+Parliamentary Reform,<lb/>
+there's <unclear>King</unclear> or Cartwright<lb/>
+read for you.</note>  The question<lb/>
+we <add>you and I</add> are upon is – not who shall govern <add>us?</add>, but to<lb/>
+whose benefit we shall be governed?</p>
+<p>Lawyer. – Well come, as you and I are friends – and<lb/>
+you seem not inclined to <unclear>stickle</unclear> for wile and speculative<lb/>
+theories, I will tell you <add>let you see</add> fairly and honestly
+</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Views

JB/091/039/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:53, 21 February 2023

Navigation

Search