JB/106/394/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/394/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
WilsonC (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>49.</head>
 
<p>as to swords &amp; pistols, there they might it should seem<lb/>
 
without danger borne the liberty of keeping in their houses &amp; wearing<lb/>
about their persons in the character of instruments for self<lb/>
defence. Arms capable of being carried in secret &amp; by that means used<lb/>
as instruments of aggression such as daggers &amp; pistols might<lb/>
such of them as mere small enough to be <gap/> concealed be comprised<lb/>
in the interdiction.</p>
<p>In regard to marriage there seems to be no reason why<lb/>
a man of this persuasion should in future be allowed to keep under<lb/>
the <unclear>hands</unclear> of that contract more women than one. In a limitation<lb/>
of this kind there will be no <gap/><gap/> <add>invasion</add> of religious<lb/>
liberty. In the Koran the having more than one is not<lb/>
made matter of obligation: in a word the sort of pluralism<lb/>
in question is an injustice in which even where <unclear>Mahometanism</unclear><lb/>
reigns, a very small number of men are partaken in comparison<lb/>
of the whole. The first wife should accordingly while living be<lb/>
the only wife. Over any other woman whom a man might engage<lb/>
to live &amp; cohabit with him, <del><gap/></del> no power should be allowed<lb/>
to him.</p>
<p>So in regard to succession. For simplicity sake the plan<lb/>
of distribution applied to property upon the death of the possessor<lb/>
should be the same in the case of a <unclear>Mahometan</unclear> as in<lb/>
the case of a Christian. Neither in this would there be any invasion<lb/>
of religious liberty, so long as the power were left to<lb/>
a man of this persuasion to give to his property by his last<lb/>
will &amp; testament that course whatever it be, which is given to<lb/>
it by the <unclear>Mahometan</unclear> Law.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 06:15, 4 July 2021

Click Here To Edit

49.

as to swords & pistols, there they might it should seem
without danger borne the liberty of keeping in their houses & wearing
about their persons in the character of instruments for self
defence. Arms capable of being carried in secret & by that means used
as instruments of aggression such as daggers & pistols might
such of them as mere small enough to be concealed be comprised
in the interdiction.

In regard to marriage there seems to be no reason why
a man of this persuasion should in future be allowed to keep under
the hands of that contract more women than one. In a limitation
of this kind there will be no invasion of religious
liberty. In the Koran the having more than one is not
made matter of obligation: in a word the sort of pluralism
in question is an injustice in which even where Mahometanism
reigns, a very small number of men are partaken in comparison
of the whole. The first wife should accordingly while living be
the only wife. Over any other woman whom a man might engage
to live & cohabit with him, no power should be allowed
to him.

So in regard to succession. For simplicity sake the plan
of distribution applied to property upon the death of the possessor
should be the same in the case of a Mahometan as in
the case of a Christian. Neither in this would there be any invasion
of religious liberty, so long as the power were left to
a man of this persuasion to give to his property by his last
will & testament that course whatever it be, which is given to
it by the Mahometan Law.



Identifier: | JB/106/394/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

106

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

394

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f49

Penner

cc1

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

34982

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in