JB/117/191/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/117/191/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/117/191/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/117/191/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
Motive for C.A.s<lb/>
 
interference purely<lb/>
 
public.  p.1</p>
<p>2<lb/>
J.B.'s recent discovery<lb/>
of the illegalities<lb/>
relating to<lb/>
N.S. Wales.  p.1.</p>
<p>3<lb/>
Romilly accordant.<lb/>
p.2.</p>
<p>4<lb/>
Incurable repugnance<lb/>
of the institution to<lb/>
every one of the ends of<lb/>
penal justice –<lb/>
confirmed by 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> <gap/>.</p>
<p>5<lb/>
Indemnity from Parliament<lb/>
for the illegalities as necessary<lb/>
but <add>on account of the <unclear>badness<unclear> of the above</add> probably will not<lb/>
be granted without<lb/>
relinquishment.<lb/>
p.3.</p>
<p>6<lb/>
<gap/> of mala fides<lb/>
1.  Original design<lb/>
repugnant to all the<lb/>
transportation Acts.<lb/>
2.  Maintenance for<lb/>
the sake of L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Belgrave.<lb/>
p.4 </p>
<p>7<lb/>
J.B.  What indulgence<lb/>
be done in return for<lb/>
kindness.<lb/>
Offer to take upon<lb/>
him the conduct of<lb/>
relinquishment.  p.4.</p>
<pb/>
<p>8<lb/>
Reasons for thus applying<lb/>
to C.A. 1. Addington<lb/>
would not<lb/>
<gap/> to J.B.s law –<lb/>
nor even Romillys<lb/>
p.6.</p>
<p>9<lb/>
<unclear>He</unclear> would be C.A.'s</p>
<p>10<lb/>
2.  J.B can not<lb/>
trust to L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Pelham's<lb/>
<add><del>present</del></add> assurances – nor<lb/>
could even to Addington's,<lb/>
if direct;  but<lb/>
could if conveyed thro'<lb/>
C.A.  p.7.</p>
<p>11<lb/>
Addingtons refusal<lb/>
to <gap/> Nepean.  p.8.</p>
<p>12<lb/>
Treasury, anonymous<lb/>
calumny<lb/>
supported by suppression having<lb/>
the effect<lb/>
of forgery.<lb/>
J.B. will petition<lb/>
and publish.  p.8.</p>
<p>13<lb/>
C.A. to be the medium<lb/>
of confidence<lb/>
on both sides.  p.9.</p>
<p>14<lb/>
J.B.'s demand – execution<lb/>
of the engagement<lb/>
for the <add><hi rend="underline">building</hi> for</add> 2000:<lb/>
more than 1000 not<lb/>
demanded.  p.10</p>
<p>15<lb/>
C.A.s opinion of<lb/>
Pitt's treatment of J.<lb/>
B. down to June 1798.<lb/>
Aggravations cease.<lb/>
p.10.</p>
<p>16<lb/>
J.B. will <gap/> the<lb/>
impeachment against<lb/>
the D. of Portland.  p.11.</p>
<p>17.<lb/>
Addington's hope from<lb/>
Pitt of tiring out J.<lb/>
B. will not <del><gap/></del>
succeed.  p.11.</p>
<pb/>
<p>18<lb/>
J.B.s care all<lb/>
along not to try to<lb/>
make an <hi rend="underline">intercessor</hi><lb/>
of C.A.</p>
<p>19.<lb/>
Time fixed for an<lb/>
answer from Addington.<lb/>
L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Pelham's<lb/>
letter will not <gap/>.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 02:49, 12 February 2022

Click Here To Edit

1
Motive for C.A.s
interference purely
public. p.1

2
J.B.'s recent discovery
of the illegalities
relating to
N.S. Wales. p.1.

3
Romilly accordant.
p.2.

4
Incurable repugnance
of the institution to
every one of the ends of
penal justice –
confirmed by 2d .

5
Indemnity from Parliament
for the illegalities as necessary
but on account of the <unclear>badness<unclear> of the above probably will not
be granted without
relinquishment.
p.3.

6
of mala fides
1. Original design
repugnant to all the
transportation Acts.
2. Maintenance for
the sake of Ld Belgrave.
p.4

7
J.B. What indulgence
be done in return for
kindness.
Offer to take upon
him the conduct of
relinquishment. p.4.


---page break---

8
Reasons for thus applying
to C.A. 1. Addington
would not
to J.B.s law –
nor even Romillys
p.6.

9
He would be C.A.'s

10
2. J.B can not
trust to Ld Pelham's
present assurances – nor
could even to Addington's,
if direct; but
could if conveyed thro'
C.A. p.7.

11
Addingtons refusal
to Nepean. p.8.

12
Treasury, anonymous
calumny
supported by suppression having
the effect
of forgery.
J.B. will petition
and publish. p.8.

13
C.A. to be the medium
of confidence
on both sides. p.9.

14
J.B.'s demand – execution
of the engagement
for the building for 2000:
more than 1000 not
demanded. p.10

15
C.A.s opinion of
Pitt's treatment of J.
B. down to June 1798.
Aggravations cease.
p.10.

16
J.B. will the
impeachment against
the D. of Portland. p.11.

17.
Addington's hope from
Pitt of tiring out J.
B. will not succeed. p.11.


---page break---

18
J.B.s care all
along not to try to
make an intercessor
of C.A.

19.
Time fixed for an
answer from Addington.
Ld Pelham's
letter will not .



Identifier: | JB/117/191/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117.

Date_1

1802-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

117

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

191

Info in main headings field

jb to ca documents sent to mr abbot

Image

002

Titles

correspondence of mr bentham with messrs addington and vansittart from 28 march 1801 to 10 sept. 1801

Category

rudiments sheet (brouillon)

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

38808

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in