★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/117/348/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/117/348/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><add>On this subject,</add> What I have said elsewhere and in print<hi rend="superscript">†</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">†</hi></note>, there can<lb/> | |||
be no need of repeating <del>it</del> here. If it has had the honour<lb/> | |||
of being read, the result must be that it has not had the<lb/> | |||
good fortune to prove, <add>at least for the present,</add> satisfactory to the Gentlemen <del>I have</del> <add>here</add><lb/> | |||
<del>in view</del> <add>in question</add>. Nothing that is in my power towards rendering<lb/> | |||
it so shall be wanting.</p> | |||
<p><del>But</del> <add>All this while,</add> upon the face of the questions that <del>are</del> <add>lie</add> before me<lb/> | |||
the alternative which I see is not between the <del>130</del><lb/> | |||
number of £1,300 <add>prisoners</add> that could be composed of <del>the 1000</del><lb/> | |||
the <hi rend="underline">agreed-on</hi> number of males, viz. 1,000, and the <del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline">now<lb/> | |||
proposed</hi> or supposed additional numbers of females, viz. 300,<lb/> | |||
but between a total of <add>no more than</add> 1000, (3<del>-wh</del> <add>whereof</add> 300 <del>of them</del><lb/> | |||
females, having 700 males,) and a total of 700,<lb/> | |||
<del>having</del> <add>whereof</add> 300 females, having but 400 males.</p> | |||
<p><del>Looking out for the reason</del> The proposed reduction<lb/> | |||
being so considerable, looking out for the reason – which<lb/> | |||
I have been able to collect is – an apprehension about<lb/> | |||
safe custody, in respect of the numbers and the vicinity<lb/> | |||
of the metropolis.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
On this subject, What I have said elsewhere and in print† †, there can
be no need of repeating it here. If it has had the honour
of being read, the result must be that it has not had the
good fortune to prove, at least for the present, satisfactory to the Gentlemen I have here
in view in question. Nothing that is in my power towards rendering
it so shall be wanting.
But All this while, upon the face of the questions that are lie before me
the alternative which I see is not between the 130
number of £1,300 prisoners that could be composed of the 1000
the agreed-on number of males, viz. 1,000, and the now
proposed or supposed additional numbers of females, viz. 300,
but between a total of no more than 1000, (3-wh whereof 300 of them
females, having 700 males,) and a total of 700,
having whereof 300 females, having but 400 males.
Looking out for the reason The proposed reduction
being so considerable, looking out for the reason – which
I have been able to collect is – an apprehension about
safe custody, in respect of the numbers and the vicinity
of the metropolis.
|
Identifier: | JB/117/348/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
17-20 |
|||
|
117 |
panopticon |
||
|
348 |
panopt. letter ii females |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
correspondence |
1 |
||
|
recto |
f7 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
letter 2110, vol. 8 |
38965 |
||
