JB/118/291/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:57, 5 May 2023

26 Jany 1812
Panopt. Paul

Page 42 line 6. "In proposing a system for general adoption
"I will not" (says the worthy Baronet) rest its operation on

a dependence upon the extraordinary merit of any individual

"magistrate or man". No: not if the individual
the man be an individual whose misfortune it is to
not to be known to the worthy Baronet. But if the
man be a magistrate who if the precept of the
sage have been conformed to by him is the person of all
others with whom his opposition acquaintance has been
most intimate, then here comes a clear exception to the rules
I will not recommend to Parliament+ + p. 47 l. 4 .... I declare my
opinion with confidence .... that as least a much
attention may be relied on .... the conductors may
depend.

So from the beginning. After an experience of
eighteen years (p. 43) I undertook to enter upon a detailed
enquiry .... At the request of the Magistracy (p. 44), I revised the original rules and Bye-laws,
and introduced such alterations and as experience
and observation suggested. In this revised state, I recommended

Identifier: \| JB/118/291/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.
Date_1	1812-01-26	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	118	Main Headings	panopticon
Folio number	291	Info in main headings field	panopt. paul
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c1
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	th 1806
Marginals		Paper Producer	andre morellet
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1806
Notes public		ID Number	39345
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/118/291/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
+<p><!-- pencil -->26 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1812<lb/>
+<!-- pencil --><head>Panopt.  Paul</head></p>
+<p>Page 42<hi rend="superscript"><del><gap/></del></hi> line 6.  "In proposing a system for general adoption<lb/>
+"I will not" (says the worthy Baronet) rest its operation on<lb/>
+:a dependence upon the extraordinary merit of any individual<lb/>
+"magistrate or man".  No:  not if <del>the individual</del><lb/>
+the man be an individual whose misfortune it is <del>to<lb/>
+not</del> to be known to the worthy Baronet.  But if the<lb/>
+man be a magistrate who if the <del><gap/></del> precept of the<lb/>
+sage have been conformed to by him is the person of all<lb/>
+others with whom his <del>opposition</del> acquaintance has been<lb/>
+most intimate, <del>then</del> <add>here</add> comes a clear exception to the rules<lb/>
+I will not recommend to Parliament<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi> p. 47 l. 4</note> .... I declare my<lb/>
+opinion with confidence .... <del>that as least a much</del><lb/>
+attention may be relied on .... the conductors may<lb/>
+depend.</p>
+<p>So from the beginning.  After an experience of<lb/>
+eighteen years (p. 43) I undertook to enter upon a detailed<lb/>
+enquiry .... <add>At the request of the Magistracy (p. 44),</add> I revised the original rules and Bye-laws,<lb/>
+and introduced such alterations <del>and</del> as experience<lb/>
+and observation suggested.  In this revised state, I recommended<lb/>
-''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
+</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Views

JB/118/291/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:57, 5 May 2023

Navigation

Search