JB/121/433/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/433/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/433/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/433/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>A possible topic of excuse may be that in the <gap/><lb/>
of this letter of October 1799 notwithstanding the nature<lb/>
and apparent tendency of the principles arrived<lb/>
in it – <add>so far were</add> the practical conclusions from those principles<lb/>
were so far from being hostile to any <unclear>closure</unclear> in respect
of the Penitentiary Establishment that they admitted of <add>expressly<lb/>
gave to</add> an extent more that should <del>I</del> of that which the Treasury<hi rend="superscript"></hi><lb/>
<unclear>sword</unclear> engaged to give it:  that they ended in<lb/>
recommending 2150 <del>instead of 1000</del> <add>was accordingly the number recommended in that</add><lb/>
that letter instead of the originally determined number <add>agreed and settled</add><lb/>
1000.</p>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
Thus much is indeed true:  but this this letter is<lb/>
 
but one of a series of letters and consultations <add>from the same quarter</add> which<lb/>
ended in a reduction from the 2150 to 2000 and<lb/>
from the 2000 to 500 – and this last reduction<lb/>
put <unclear>arrivedly</unclear> upon a




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 06:01, 31 May 2021

'Click Here To Edit

A possible topic of excuse may be that in the
of this letter of October 1799 notwithstanding the nature
and apparent tendency of the principles arrived
in it – so far were the practical conclusions from those principles
were so far from being hostile to any closure in respect of the Penitentiary Establishment that they admitted of expressly
gave to
an extent more that should I of that which the Treasury
sword engaged to give it: that they ended in
recommending 2150 instead of 1000 was accordingly the number recommended in that
that letter instead of the originally determined number agreed and settled
1000.

Thus much is indeed true: but this this letter is
but one of a series of letters and consultations from the same quarter which
ended in a reduction from the 2150 to 2000 and
from the 2000 to 500 – and this last reduction
put arrivedly upon a



Identifier: | JB/121/433/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-03-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

20-21

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

433

Info in main headings field

Dispensing Power

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

F28

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in