JB/122/085/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/085/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><del>If on grounds purely and exclusively public <add>or at any rate exclusive of all private/the least private regard for me</add> you can not<lb/>find sufficient motive to take upon you the mediation I venture<lb/>to propose, I neither ask nor so much as wish you, to think of<lb/>it in any other.</del></p> <!-- next three paragraphs faintly crossed through in pencil --> <p>To witness the inevitable <add><sic>indeletible</sic></add> shame as well as serious<lb/>personal danger of so many <add>a number of</add> public men <del>towards</del> <add>to</add> when you are<lb/>bound by such powerful ties, and whose eyes must be encountering<lb/>yours every day, is that sort of task <del>to</del> which I can<lb/>not now attempt to impose upon you without great reluctance:<lb?>and of ,del>any thing it had been past their care had</del> not, with<lb/>the most desperate obstinacy their ears had not been shut<lb/>against all less irksome representations, <add>humiliating applications</add> neither <add>they nor</add> you not they<lb/>would have been troubled with this.</p> <p>Where is the connection say you? &#x2014; what is certain is<lb/>that Panopticon is neither better nor worse for the criminality <add>illegality</add><lb/>and folly that has been manifested in the foundation<lb/>and management of N.S> Wales.  What is equally<lb/>so is that it is no worse: and that it is not from <add>by</add> the<lb/>any the smallest suspicion that has ever entered the head<lb/>of any human being that <del>is ha</del> the treatment it has and<lb/>will have been produced, but by the base and sordid new<lb/>resolution taken to make <add>take</add> the <gap/> caprice of Lord<lb/>Belgrave for the spring and <add>standard</add> of penal justice &#x2014;  It<lb/>is therefore to force them to <del>let</del> obey the dictates of their<lb/>own consciences that I apply the only instrument to the<lb/>touch of which such minds are sensible.</p> <!-- next paragraph crossed through in ink --> <p>The maxim <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Addlington finds it <add>has willingly found</add> convenient to adopt as that<lb/><sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Pitt can do no wrong: and that he may not be obliged to part with it<lb/><del>his determination</del> has been to neither <add>never</add> to hear or read any thing to the contrary.<lb/>He has taken for his model the Judge spoken of in the Newspaper that <add>his</add> lies<lb/>just being brought in I also imagine was more to suffer <add>more on</add> the side of a cause to be<lb/>heard bearing both sides he said confused him.</p> <!-- in the margin to the left of this paragraph, crossed though in ink --> <p>For Mr Addington to be<lb/>confused I should suspect<lb?>to be a matter of a great<lb/>difficulty.  <gap/> or not<lb/>he is not <gap/> to be wondered<lb/>at, if while he is <gap/><lb/><!-- continues at right angles --> to a spite of law and morality to what <del>appears</del> <add>presents</add> itself to him as <gap/> <gap/> <gap/>.</p> <!-- in pencil in the margin above this text  --> <p><note>Object<lb/>Panopticon not<lb/>the better for Peels<lb/>misconduct about<lb/>N. S. Wales.<lb/>Answer Goodness<lb/>of Panopticon never doubted.</<note></p> <p><note>danger which by your<lb/>interprection may perhaps <add>possibly</add><lb/> be invested, accompanied<lb/>by <add>a degree of</add> shame which<lb/>no interprection can<lb/>altogether avert</note></p> <!-- in the margin at the top of the page at right angles, crossed through in ink --> <p><!-- in red ink --> <unclear>Page</unclear> 77</p> <p>has at all times and others both systems been<lb/>composed.  Under the old system, the bondage<lb/>and with it the confinement <add>was</add> remissible <add>as has been stated elsewhere <!-- + in red in --> <hi rend="superscript">+</hi></add> <del>on</del> by <lb/><Add>purchase or on any other power granted at</add> the <del>pleasure</del> <add>will</add> of <del>the</del> <Add>an</add> individual <del>entrusted the</del><lb/><del><gap/></del> <add> known possessor of the property in the service</add> under the new System neither the one<lb/>not the other  <Add>is</add> remissible but by the Agent of the<lb/>Crown, nor therefore but upon public grounds.<lb/> More than this,<lb/> <!-- in red ink --> + Letter 1. to Lord Pelham</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 10:55, 11 November 2020

'Click Here To Edit

If on grounds purely and exclusively public or at any rate exclusive of all private/the least private regard for me you can not
find sufficient motive to take upon you the mediation I venture
to propose, I neither ask nor so much as wish you, to think of
it in any other.

To witness the inevitable indeletible shame as well as serious
personal danger of so many a number of public men towards to when you are
bound by such powerful ties, and whose eyes must be encountering
yours every day, is that sort of task to which I can
not now attempt to impose upon you without great reluctance:<lb?>and of ,del>any thing it had been past their care had not, with
the most desperate obstinacy their ears had not been shut
against all less irksome representations, humiliating applications neither they nor you not they
would have been troubled with this.

Where is the connection say you? — what is certain is
that Panopticon is neither better nor worse for the criminality illegality
and folly that has been manifested in the foundation
and management of N.S> Wales. What is equally
so is that it is no worse: and that it is not from by the
any the smallest suspicion that has ever entered the head
of any human being that is ha the treatment it has and
will have been produced, but by the base and sordid new
resolution taken to make take the caprice of Lord
Belgrave for the spring and standard of penal justice — It
is therefore to force them to let obey the dictates of their
own consciences that I apply the only instrument to the
touch of which such minds are sensible.

The maxim Mr Addlington finds it has willingly found convenient to adopt as that
Mr Pitt can do no wrong: and that he may not be obliged to part with it
his determination has been to neither never to hear or read any thing to the contrary.
He has taken for his model the Judge spoken of in the Newspaper that his lies
just being brought in I also imagine was more to suffer more on the side of a cause to be
heard bearing both sides he said confused him.

For Mr Addington to be
confused I should suspect<lb?>to be a matter of a great
difficulty. or not
he is not to be wondered
at, if while he is
to a spite of law and morality to what appears presents itself to him as .

Object
Panopticon not
the better for Peels
misconduct about
N. S. Wales.
Answer Goodness
of Panopticon never doubted.</<note>

<note>danger which by your
interprection may perhaps possibly
be invested, accompanied
by a degree of shame which
no interprection can
altogether avert

Page 77

has at all times and others both systems been
composed. Under the old system, the bondage
and with it the confinement was remissible as has been stated elsewhere + on by
purchase or on any other power granted at the pleasure will of the an individual entrusted the
known possessor of the property in the service under the new System neither the one
not the other is remissible but by the Agent of the
Crown, nor therefore but upon public grounds.
More than this,
+ Letter 1. to Lord Pelham




Identifier: | JB/122/085/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

085

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

Correspondence

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D7

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

Letter 1970, vol. 7

ID Number

002

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in