★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1819 <sic>Dec.</sic> 26<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><del>10</del><lb/><note>III Experience <gap/> U.S.<lb/> 1. United States</note><lb/>1 <note>§.3. Conclusive Offer to<lb?>receive U.S. viz Universality</note></p> <!-- marginal summaries in pencil --><p>or 1<lb/> Objection — State this is<lb/> not universality, nor<lb/>yet what you mean by<lb/>virtual <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic></note></p> <p>§.3.</p> <p>Well but (it may be said) still there is not indication,<lb/>for it is not universality of suffrage: it is not what you call <add>yourself</add><lb/><add>regard as</add> virtually universal suffrage.</p> <p>Will this be said. A <add>question with an</add> short answer is here as ready to <add>in readiness</add><lb/>met it.</p> <p><note>2<lb/>Answer. I will accept<lb/>this instead of virtual<lb/>universality if you<lb/> will adopt it.</note></p> <p><del>will you then</del> You by whom this observation is made<lb/>will you accede to radicality in all these particulars, on<lb/>which, in that happy country, with its happy constitution,<lb/>and that a really-existing one - a real not a factitious<lb/>entity — it has <del>so <gap/></del> for so great a length of time, and<lb/>with such undisputable good effect, been established? If yes<lb/><del>I for</del> my <del>part</del> and you will on your part <add>supposing the power to be in your hand,</add> you are ready to<lb/>force your exertions to those of the <sic>radicalist.</sic> I <del><gap/></del> on<lb/>my part, in that same supposition am ready to accept<lb/>your offer: and to accept it even with gratitude and gladness</p> <p><note>making this one exception,<lb/>by which<lb/>one exclusion will be put<lb/>upon all those householders<lb/> who have not their <add>a certain</add><lb/>primary qualification<lb/>and <sic>householder</sic> suffrage<lb/>adopted instead of <lb/>virtually universal<lb/>suffrage.</note></p> <p>But to <add>with</add> such <gap/> I must subjoin <add>except</add> his observations</p> <p>1. One is that it is only for the sake of union that I can<lb/>accept it<lb/> 1. One is that in this way one exclusion is put <del>perhaps</del><lb/> upon a vast multitude of men, perhaps not less than<lb/>that of those admitted, and of such exclusion I do not<lb/>perceive any the smallest one. Ask me what the advantage<lb/>is from the exclusion, I for my part know of none. From<lb/><del><gap/> This being <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>the votes of</add> these <sic>Housholders</sic> even with nothing<lb/>but the <gap/> of <gap/> for subsistence, I for my part am<lb/>unable to find any cause of fear, any more than from<lb/> <sic>Housholders.</sic></p> <p>2. The exclusion being in my own conception unattended<lb/> with advantage in any shape, I see not <add> in the point of those class of persons excluded</add> any great probability<lb/>of their being satisfied <add>content</add> to give up these choices <del>and then</del> to make the<lb/>self-sacrifice when others make none, and thus give up their choices.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} |
1819 Dec. 26
Radicalism not dangerous
10
III Experience U.S.
1. United States
1 §.3. Conclusive Offer to<lb?>receive U.S. viz Universality
or 1
Objection — State this is
not universality, nor
yet what you mean by
virtual do</note>
§.3.
Well but (it may be said) still there is not indication,
for it is not universality of suffrage: it is not what you call yourself
regard as virtually universal suffrage.
Will this be said. A question with an short answer is here as ready to in readiness
met it.
2
Answer. I will accept
this instead of virtual
universality if you
will adopt it.
will you then You by whom this observation is made
will you accede to radicality in all these particulars, on
which, in that happy country, with its happy constitution,
and that a really-existing one - a real not a factitious
entity — it has so for so great a length of time, and
with such undisputable good effect, been established? If yes
I for my part and you will on your part supposing the power to be in your hand, you are ready to
force your exertions to those of the radicalist. I on
my part, in that same supposition am ready to accept
your offer: and to accept it even with gratitude and gladness
making this one exception,
by which
one exclusion will be put
upon all those householders
who have not their a certain
primary qualification
and householder suffrage
adopted instead of
virtually universal
suffrage.
But to with such I must subjoin except his observations
1. One is that it is only for the sake of union that I can
accept it
1. One is that in this way one exclusion is put perhaps
upon a vast multitude of men, perhaps not less than
that of those admitted, and of such exclusion I do not
perceive any the smallest one. Ask me what the advantage
is from the exclusion, I for my part know of none. From
This being the votes of these Housholders even with nothing
but the of for subsistence, I for my part am
unable to find any cause of fear, any more than from
Housholders.
2. The exclusion being in my own conception unattended
with advantage in any shape, I see not in the point of those class of persons excluded any great probability
of their being satisfied content to give up these choices and then to make the
self-sacrifice when others make none, and thus give up their choices.
Identifier: | JB/137/262/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1819-12-26 |
1-3 |
||
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
262 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]] |
||
arthur wellesley, duke of wellington |
|||
1818 |
|||
46979 |
|||