JB/143/117/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/143/117/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1825 June 24</p>
 
<head>Rationale of Reward</head>
 
<note>61 Scale of Ranks</note><lb/>
<p>In <del>Use case</del> of a case between individual and individual, this is<lb/>
what is done on the occasion of any the <gap/> action for work and<lb/>
labour done: and why in one where the <del>defendent</del> party in the defendants side in the public<lb/>
there should be <del>almost deputy authenticated by</del> any more difficulty<lb/>
will remain to be shewn by any one to whom this made of administers extra most for<lb/>
extra <del>public</del> service to<lb/>
the public is objected to.</p>
By <del>one</del> <add>an <hi rend="underline">efficient</hi> that is to say a</add> <del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline">judicial</hi> acknowledgement <add><del>of</del> extraordinary</add>public<lb/>
service <add>as having been</add> rendered, the natural dignity resulting from the act<lb/>
f rendering such service will be <add>not only</add> established <del>and</del><add>but</add> extended<lb/>
<del>By</del> <add>Of </add> an instrument <del>of this kind</del> drawn up for this purpose - <del><gap/></del><add>of</add> a<lb/>
<del>By such acknowledgement <gap/>and can not in any <gap/></del><lb/>
certificate included in an extraordinary Judicial decree no mis application<lb/>
<add>are</add> be <del>misapplied</del> <add>made</add> any otherwise  than <del>as <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 19:33, 19 April 2023

Click Here To Edit

1825 June 24

Rationale of Reward 61 Scale of Ranks

In Use case of a case between individual and individual, this is
what is done on the occasion of any the action for work and
labour done: and why in one where the defendent party in the defendants side in the public
there should be almost deputy authenticated by any more difficulty
will remain to be shewn by any one to whom this made of administers extra most for
extra public service to
the public is objected to.

By one an efficient that is to say a judicial acknowledgement of extraordinarypublic
service as having been rendered, the natural dignity resulting from the act
f rendering such service will be not only established andbut extended
By Of an instrument of this kind drawn up for this purpose - of a
By such acknowledgement and can not in any
certificate included in an extraordinary Judicial decree no mis application
are be misapplied made any otherwise than as



Identifier: | JB/143/117/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 143.

Date_1

1825-06-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

143

Main Headings

rationale of reward

Folio number

117

Info in main headings field

rationale of reward

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d6 / e6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48750

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in