JB/137/277/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/277/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1820 <sic>Apr.</sic> 16<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><note><sic>ult<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic><lb/>III. Experience II Ireland</note><lb/>4 <note>&sect;.3. Fruits, Golden Age</note></p> <p>Thus for the historian: a few remarks may here<lb/>perhaps be found not altogether out of place. 1. The persons<lb/>by whom the damage, such as it was, <add>had for its <unclear>milkers</unclear></add> was done were not the<lb/>sort of person here in question &#x2014; the associated Volunteers, but<lb/> promiscuous multitude of which the Volunteers for aught<lb/>appears did not, any of them, compose a part; 2 that<lb/>in Ireland more especially, the magnitude of the interest<lb/>at <unclear>state</unclear> considered, the <del><gap/></del> <foreign>quantum</foreign> of the mischief done<lb/>taking it altogether was not, more upon the face of this account<lb/>of it very considerable. 3. that in the passage on which <del><gap/></del><lb/> speaking of the only house injured it is spoken of as<lb/>"reduced" to a ruin [+] <note>[+] in this history<lb/>published some<lb/>20 or 28 years<lb/>after the time in<lb/>question</note> the rhetorician seems to have taken<lb/>place of the historian.   Desirous of seeing the account given<lb/>of the transaction at the time, I turned to <del><gap/></del> <add>Dodsleys</add> Annual Register<lb/>for that year (1779) and <add> at the part called <del><gap/></del> the Historical Chronicle</add> in a letter dated Dublin,<lb/><sic>Nov</sic> 15. in the passage in which this same <del>It</del> house is<lb/>spoken of "destroying the windows on the ground floor, and<lb/>"doing some small damage to the next story" was the<lb/>scene of the damage. <add><del>"</del></add> At the last <del><gap/></del> Westminster<lb/>Election but one <sic>A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> 1819 &#x2014; Lord Castlereagh's House, for the<lb/>damage done to which his <add>Lordship</add> obtained a Verdict against the Hundred<lb/> for £ <!-- blank space --><gap/> did not come off so easily. <note>&#9758; Fill up the blank</note></p> <p> As to <del>person</del> <add>corporal</add> injury to person, whatsoever was talked<lb/>of, <del><gap/></del> <add>none</add> (it appears) was done</p>         
<head>1820 <sic>Apr.</sic> 16<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><note><sic>ult<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic><lb/>III. Experience II Ireland</note><lb/>4 <note>&sect;.3. Fruits, Golden Age</note></p> <p>Thus for the historian: a few remarks may here<lb/>perhaps be found not altogether out of place. 1. The persons<lb/>by whom the damage, such as it was, <add>had for its <unclear>milkers</unclear></add> was done were not the<lb/>sort of person here in question &#x2014; the associated Volunteers, but<lb/> promiscuous multitude of which the Volunteers for aught<lb/>appears did not, any of them, compose a part; 2 that<lb/>in Ireland more especially, the magnitude of the interest<lb/>at <unclear>state</unclear> considered, the <del><gap/></del> <foreign>quantum</foreign> of the mischief done<lb/>taking it altogether was not, more upon the face of this account<lb/>of it very considerable. 3. that in the passage on which <del><gap/></del><lb/> speaking of the only house injured it is spoken of as<lb/>"reduced" to a ruin [+] <note>[+] in this history<lb/>published some<lb/>20 or 28 years<lb/>after the time in<lb/>question</note> the rhetorician seems to have taken<lb/>place of the historian. Desirous of seeing the account given<lb/>of the transaction at the time, I turned to <del><gap/></del> <add>Dodsleys</add> Annual Register<lb/>for that year (1779) and <add> at the part called <del><gap/></del> the Historical Chronicle</add> in a letter dated Dublin,<lb/><sic>Nov</sic> 15. in the passage in which this same <del>It</del> house is<lb/>spoken of "destroying the windows on the ground floor, and<lb/>"doing some small damage to the next story" was the<lb/>scene of the damage. <add><del>"</del></add> At the last <del><gap/></del> Westminster<lb/>Election but one <sic>A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> 1819 &#x2014; Lord Castlereagh's House, for the<lb/>damage done to which his <add>Lordship</add> obtained a Verdict against the Hundred<lb/> for £ <!-- blank space --><gap/> did not come off so easily. <note>&#9758; Fill up the blank</note></p> <p> As to <del>person</del> <add>corporal</add> injury to person, whatsoever was talked<lb/>of, <del><gap/></del> <add>none</add> (it appears) was done</p>         






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:59, 27 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1820 Apr. 16
Radicalism not dangerous

ulto
III. Experience II Ireland

4 §.3. Fruits, Golden Age

Thus for the historian: a few remarks may here
perhaps be found not altogether out of place. 1. The persons
by whom the damage, such as it was, had for its milkers was done were not the
sort of person here in question — the associated Volunteers, but
promiscuous multitude of which the Volunteers for aught
appears did not, any of them, compose a part; 2 that
in Ireland more especially, the magnitude of the interest
at state considered, the quantum of the mischief done
taking it altogether was not, more upon the face of this account
of it very considerable. 3. that in the passage on which
speaking of the only house injured it is spoken of as
"reduced" to a ruin [+] [+] in this history
published some
20 or 28 years
after the time in
question
the rhetorician seems to have taken
place of the historian. Desirous of seeing the account given
of the transaction at the time, I turned to Dodsleys Annual Register
for that year (1779) and at the part called the Historical Chronicle in a letter dated Dublin,
Nov 15. in the passage in which this same It house is
spoken of "destroying the windows on the ground floor, and
"doing some small damage to the next story" was the
scene of the damage. " At the last Westminster
Election but one Ao 1819 — Lord Castlereagh's House, for the
damage done to which his Lordship obtained a Verdict against the Hundred
for £ did not come off so easily. ☞ Fill up the blank

As to person corporal injury to person, whatsoever was talked
of, none (it appears) was done




Identifier: | JB/137/277/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1820-04-16

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

277

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

46994

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in