JB/051/027/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/051/027/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:




under construction ...
under construction by Diane Folan ... please do not amend!




Line 25: Line 25:
<del><unclear>being</unclear></del> in a similar conjuncture would dictate <add>to the same authority</add> another: <add>[<unclear>taught</unclear> &amp;]</add> justified &amp; instructed by
<del><unclear>being</unclear></del> in a similar conjuncture would dictate <add>to the same authority</add> another: <add>[<unclear>taught</unclear> &amp;]</add> justified &amp; instructed by
<lb/>
<lb/>
by this example .
by this example . Each succeeding Administration (we may venture to pronounce
<lb/>
 
for the purpose as well as that of Forfeiture &amp; corruption of Blood) thinking, (&amp; <gap/>
<lb/>
see not why not justly) itself entitled to take the same precautions for it's <unclear>secur</unclear><!-- work unfinished -->
<lb/>
as a preceding : are in <add>especially</add> particular <del>that <add><del>to which</del></add> has not been</del> <add><del>whose conduct</del> <add>the memory of which</add></add> is not marked <del>by any run <gap/></del> <add>by History with <gap/></add>
<lb/>
disapprobation <add>particular stigma</add> <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note>+ Qu - a little about this .</note>.
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>



Revision as of 13:16, 31 December 2011

Click Here To Edit


under construction by Diane Folan ... please do not amend!


EVIDENCE. 1* Number

reach him. I must not indeed dispensible that the preamble states that two witnesses
had originally deposed to the treasonable fact act of which he was accused Indicted , by the from the evasion
of one of whom it was that the deficiency accrued which was thus to be supplied : but I
think it will hardly be contended thought that the testimony of 2 witnesses examined on
one side only and in secret is more than an equivalent for that of one — exam
in open Court & cross-examined.

It is easy to conceive that in the event of things , the efficacy whether good or bad
of this provision ; there being all probability that the same sense of necessity which dictated one parliamentary infractio
being in a similar conjuncture would dictate to the same authority another: [taught &] justified & instructed by
by this example . Each succeeding Administration (we may venture to pronounce
for the purpose as well as that of Forfeiture & corruption of Blood) thinking, (&
see not why not justly) itself entitled to take the same precautions for it's secur
as a preceding : are in especially particular that <add>to which</add> has not been whose conduct <add>the memory of which</add> is not marked by any run by History with
disapprobation particular stigma + + Qu - a little about this ..



Identifier: | JB/051/027/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

027

Info in main headings field

evidence number

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1*

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

cc1

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16192

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in