JB/123/222/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/123/222/001: Difference between revisions

m Protected "JB/123/222/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/123/222/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/123/222/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>Case relative to the Tothill Fields Bill</head>
Rate will have <hi rend=”underline”>something</hi> instead of <hi rend=”underline”>nothing.</hi>
As to the <hi rend=”underline”>bulk</hi> of the Inhabitants, what <hi rend=”underline”>Heritage</hi> the
Haste affords, being in point of right shared amongst so many<lb/>
thousands [the number in S<hi rend=’superscript’>t</hi> Margarets alone being estimated<lb/>
at 12,000] can be no object to any <hi rend=”underline”>one.</hi> The interest
of the Consideration Money for the portion proposed to be purchased<lb/>
<hi rend=”underline”>would</hi> be an object of some account <!-- c -->  if applied in case
of the Poor Rates, or rather [to make the distribution of the
compensation Money the more equable and opposite] in case
[as is proposed] of the <hi rend=”underline”>scavengers</hi> Rate; that being a rate to
which many Inhabitants pay, who by <hi rend=”underline”>poverty</hi> are excused
from the <hi rend=”underline”>Poor rate</hi>, as appears by 25<hi rend=’superscript’>th</hi> yes 2 <hi rend=’superscript’>d</hi> Ch. 23 above
referred to – being the Act for incorporating the Parishes
of Saint Margaret and Saint John, for these and other
purposes -
In the <hi rend=”underline”>present</hi> Bill no mention [it may perhaps
be observed] is made of any <hi rend=”underline”>consent</hi> on the part of <hi rend=”underline”>any</hi> of
the Parties interested. In point of <hi rend=”underline”>fact</hi>, no consent has been
obtained; nor has any <hi rend=”underline”>application</hi> been made for that purpose,
except
<lb/>
<!-- c --> Number of Acres proposed to be purchased clean
of Roads say . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . } 36
Annual value per Acre, say . . . . . . . . . . . .
Annual value of the Lot . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Number of years purchased to be given say, . . . . 30
Total Compensation Money for the Lot proposed to be
purchased for the Penientiary House . . . . . . }
N.B This is over and above the compensation Money
should be awarded for the 11 Acres proposed to be allotted
to the Dean and Chapter for the use of the Westminster scholars]
and the right <hi rend="underline">Leasing-out</hi>, or otherwise employing; what
will remain of the 5 or 6 Acres <hi rend="underline">behind</hi> Rochester Row, after
the allotment of about <hi rend="underline">half and acre</hi> for the <hi rend="underline">Poor-house</hi>, proposed
to be built in <gap/> of the <hi rend="underline">existing</hi> Poor-House &#x2014;


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
Line 8: Line 44:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 13:03, 2 April 2020

Click Here To Edit Case relative to the Tothill Fields Bill Rate will have something instead of nothing. As to the bulk of the Inhabitants, what Heritage the Haste affords, being in point of right shared amongst so many
thousands [the number in St Margarets alone being estimated
at 12,000] can be no object to any one. The interest of the Consideration Money for the portion proposed to be purchased
would be an object of some account if applied in case of the Poor Rates, or rather [to make the distribution of the compensation Money the more equable and opposite] in case [as is proposed] of the scavengers Rate; that being a rate to which many Inhabitants pay, who by poverty are excused from the Poor rate, as appears by 25th yes 2 d Ch. 23 above referred to – being the Act for incorporating the Parishes of Saint Margaret and Saint John, for these and other purposes - In the present Bill no mention [it may perhaps be observed] is made of any consent on the part of any of the Parties interested. In point of fact, no consent has been obtained; nor has any application been made for that purpose, except

Number of Acres proposed to be purchased clean

of Roads say . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . } 36 Annual value per Acre, say . . . . . . . . . . . . Annual value of the Lot . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of years purchased to be given say, . . . . 30 Total Compensation Money for the Lot proposed to be purchased for the Penientiary House . . . . . . } N.B This is over and above the compensation Money should be awarded for the 11 Acres proposed to be allotted to the Dean and Chapter for the use of the Westminster scholars] and the right Leasing-out, or otherwise employing; what will remain of the 5 or 6 Acres behind Rochester Row, after the allotment of about half and acre for the Poor-house, proposed to be built in of the existing Poor-House —

This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet




Identifier: | JB/123/222/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 123.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

123

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

222

Info in main headings field

case relative to the tothill fields bill

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f9 / f10

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

fr3

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1794

Notes public

see note 3 to letter 1392, vol. 6

ID Number

41648

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in