JB/159/012/001

Punishments distinguished and defined Punishment Restraint Warburton. Importance of the above distinctions "such dist? of precese moral words", says Bishop Warburton, speaking of punishment and restraint, "would would "think it was not very easy to comprehend." + With ? ? to that acute and able reasoner to whose instructions I find myself ? ? I cannot altogether of this opinion ? my own part I know that with the ?fist ? I to distingwish ? I felt my- -self ? danger of confounding them wery ? This I do not attrubute solely to my own weak- -ness and that for this reason ? them, that , ? himself ? to ? not to have stated the question so churly ? as could have been wishid. If punishment and ? ? the ? were "speeres of any thing of which punishment also is a speeres, I will not say that was in this case it would not be easy to confound them: and however it might be not very difficult perhaps, upon occasion to distinguish them. The ? world be first to refer them to this nearest common ?, and then to assign their difference, But this unfortunately is not the case. Punishment in the sense of it is pain: pain is a sensation: a sensation is of the clap of real entities, Punishment in another sense of it is an act: an act is again in the num- -ber of real entities. But restraint stands not in any sense in whooh it is ever and in either of this clap is nor in any class of real entities. In neither of these two senses