★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/137/347/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1820 <sic>Jan.</sic> 12<lb/>Radical Reform Bill</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p>15 § <gap/> 9<lb/><note> III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>(2) (1) 1 <note>J.B.'s<lb/>J.B. Conclusion</note></p> <p>or 8 or 1<lb/>Misconception | <head>1820 <sic>Jan.</sic> 12<lb/>Radical Reform Bill</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p>15 § <gap/> 9<lb/><note> III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>(2) (1) 1 <note>J.B.'s<lb/>J.B. Conclusion</note></p> <p><note>or 8 or 1<lb/>Misconception now<lb/>not possible</note></p> <p><note><add>J.B.'s</add> Democratic ascendency<lb/>here explained<lb/>1. in <sic>Introd.</sic>.to Reform<lb/>Catechism 2. here<lb/>In forms of government<lb/> no change; in the representation<lb/> none in principle<lb/>compared with<lb/>primeval state. Prorogations,<lb/><del>could</del> Privileges the<lb/>same.</note>.</p> <p>There will not now I hope be much room for<lb/> misconception.</p> <p>What I mean by democratic ascendency has <add>was</add><lb/> been explained <del>here and</del> <sic>A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> 1817 in the Introduction<lb/>to my Parliamentary Reform Catechism, and again<lb/>in the present pages: the ascendency of the people as<lb/>it would be effected by radical reform, as here and<lb/>there explained: the forms of government remaining<lb/>without change: <del> the <gap/> <gap/></del> no change proposed other<lb/>than in the state of the representation of the people in the<lb/>Common House: the Monarch with the same prerogatives:<lb/> the Lords with the same privileges.</p> <p><note>and, when compared<lb/>with the primeval state<lb/> of the <del>government</del> <add>representation</add>, even<lb/>this change a change<lb/> in details only, and<lb/>not in principle.</note></p> <!-- marginal note in pencil --> <p><note> or 9 or 2<lb/>Of proposed <del><gap/></del> <add>operation</add><lb/><del>th</del> <add>for</add> putting the change<lb/> misconception impossible: —<lb/> the same<lb/>as recommended by<lb/>Pitt in 1782 while<lb/>carrying on in Ireland<lb/>by Grey in<lb/>1794 quoting Pitt</note></p> <p>The means <add>operation</add> by which if it depended upon<lb/>me the change would be produced have also been<lb/>explained, and beyond all danger it is hoped, of<lb/>misconception: the same that was approved and recommended<lb/>by the late M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Pitt <add>in the British House of Commons</add> a little before he became<lb/><del>Minister of <gap/></del> recommended for Great Britain<lb/>at the very time when they were carrying on<lb/>in and for Ireland: the same that were again recommended<lb/> by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> now Earl Grey also in the House<lb/>of Commons, he referring at the same time to the<lb/>recommendation <del>of</del> <add>given by</add> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Pitt as above</p> <!-- marginal note in pencil --> <p><note>or 10 or 3<lb/>If J.B. no more a<lb/> seditionist or republican,<lb/> then so <hi rend="underline">they</hi></note></p> <p>If I am a seditionist and a republican, <del>I am</del><lb/> as a seditionist I am the same sort of <add>republican or </add> seditionist<lb/><del>as other</del> now as M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Pitt and M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Grey were then.</p><!-- marginal note in pencil --> <p><note>or 11 or 4<lb/>Not that they prove it<lb/>right, but they save it<lb/>from consistent refusal<lb/>from which <gap/> I <gap/></note></p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}} |
1820 Jan. 12
Radical Reform Bill
15 § 9
III Experience
II Ireland
(2) (1) 1 J.B.'s
J.B. Conclusion
or 8 or 1
Misconception now
not possible
J.B.'s Democratic ascendency
here explained
1. in Introd..to Reform
Catechism 2. here
In forms of government
no change; in the representation
none in principle
compared with
primeval state. Prorogations,
could Privileges the
same..
There will not now I hope be much room for
misconception.
What I mean by democratic ascendency has was
been explained here and Ao 1817 in the Introduction
to my Parliamentary Reform Catechism, and again
in the present pages: the ascendency of the people as
it would be effected by radical reform, as here and
there explained: the forms of government remaining
without change: the no change proposed other
than in the state of the representation of the people in the
Common House: the Monarch with the same prerogatives:
the Lords with the same privileges.
and, when compared
with the primeval state
of the government representation, even
this change a change
in details only, and
not in principle.
or 9 or 2
Of proposed operation
th for putting the change
misconception impossible: —
the same
as recommended by
Pitt in 1782 while
carrying on in Ireland
by Grey in
1794 quoting Pitt
The means operation by which if it depended upon
me the change would be produced have also been
explained, and beyond all danger it is hoped, of
misconception: the same that was approved and recommended
by the late Mr Pitt in the British House of Commons a little before he became
Minister of recommended for Great Britain
at the very time when they were carrying on
in and for Ireland: the same that were again recommended
by Mr now Earl Grey also in the House
of Commons, he referring at the same time to the
recommendation of given by Mr Pitt as above
or 10 or 3
If J.B. no more a
seditionist or republican,
then so they
If I am a seditionist and a republican, I am
as a seditionist I am the same sort of republican or seditionist
as other now as Mr Pitt and Mr Grey were then.
or 11 or 4
Not that they prove it
right, but they save it
from consistent refusal
from which I
Identifier: | JB/137/347/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1820-01-12 |
or 8 or 1 - or 11 or 4 |
||
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
347 |
radical reform bill |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c2 / c1 / d9 / e1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1816]] |
||
arthur wellesley, duke of wellington |
|||
1816 |
|||
47064 |
|||