JB/042/405/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/405/001: Difference between revisions

Kalasiris (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


<head><p>1824. April 21</p>
1824. April 21
<p>Constitutional Code.</p>
Constitutional Code.
<p>Ch. 5. Judiciary Collectively.</p></head>
<p><note>Art. 5</note> In <unclear>some</unclear> <!-- may be 'most' --> cases it may be matter of more or less difficulty for a man to satisfy himself whether it is in <unclear>the design</unclear> is in the ordinance made in <unclear>derivation</unclear> of it, used the <unclear>impugned</unclear> imperfection <unclear>law has in it</unclear>: but so long as in any case, any person <unclear>who pleases</unclear> <add>so to understand</add> is at liberty to indicate the <unclear>injurious</unclear> imperfection, and <unclear>profess</unclear> that in <gap/> <unclear>law</unclear> view of the matter as the <unclear>most</unclear><!-- not sure whether this is 'more' or 'most' --> apt remedy, <gap/> on this <unclear>clamorous</unclear> on that <unclear>occasion</unclear> to the uncertainty no practical inconvenience seems capable of <add>unable to</add> resulting from it. </p>


<note>Art. 5. Difficult <add>sometimes</add> at times to be <gap/> </note>
IV
Ch. 5. Judiciary Collectively
&sect;. <gap/> indicate
function


<p><note>Art. 6</note> <unclear>The definition</unclear> and the only material differences <gap/> to be <gap/> indicate regard <unclear>for the</unclear> <unclear>two</unclear> following cases. 1. This person by whom the suggestion is made, as the one individual other than <unclear>the</unclear> Judge is as has <del><gap/></del> <add>a</add> <del><gap/></del> Judge. If a Judge <unclear>has been</unclear> a Judge having <add>actual</add> experience of the matter, as a Judge at <unclear>Georgia</unclear>: in ultimate <gap/> no finding has <gap/> in the respect is said very materially different from Kant of the individual <add><gap/></add> at large. 2. If a Judge having experience of the matter, it must be, <del>for the reason</del> <add><gap/></add> of <gap/> to be confirmed to act <unclear>generously</unclear>, to the collect consequences of an <gap/> already <unclear>demonstrated</unclear> <!-- could also be 'mentioned' -->, <add>in relation to the <gap/> matter</add> as antecedently to essay much not already instituted. <!-- constituents? --></p>
2
 
5
Art. 5. Difficult sometimes it may
be to determine whether
the imperfection is in the
design or the expression.
But so long as any
person is at liberty
to give indication of it
in either case, no practical
inconvenience can follow
 
<p>Art. 5 In some cases it may be matter of more or less
difficulty for a man to satisfy himself whether it is in
the design or in the ordinance made in prosecution of it,
that the supposed imperfection has its seat: but so long
as in any case, any person who pleases <add>is so inclined</add> is at liberty to
indicate the supposed imperfection, and propose what in his
view of the matter is the most apt remedy, whatsoever be
on this occasion the uncertainty, no practical inconvenience
seems capable of <add>liable to</add> <del><gap/></del> resulting from it. </p>
 
<note>6
Art. 6. Sole cases attended
with material difference
1. Suggester, a Judge do
not a Judge.
2. If a Judge, a Judge
acting as such on the occasion
in question; or not
so acting: in which case
he is on the footing of a
non-Judge.</note>
 
<p>Art. 6 The differences and the only material differences seem
to be those which regard the two following cases. 1. The person by
whom the suggestion is made is he an individual other than the a
Judge or is he the <add>a</add> Judge. <gap/> If a Judge is he a Judge
having <add>actual</add> experience of the matter, or a Judge at large: in
which latter case the footing he stands upon in this respect is not very
materially different from that of the an individual at large. 2. <gap/> If
a Judge having experience of the matter, it must be, <del>as the consequence <add>except where he</add>
of</del> unless he be empowered to act spontaneously, be either
in consequence of an act <gap/> already instituted, <add>in relation to the subject matter</add> or antecedently
to any such act already instituted.</p>


<p>In either of these cases the exercise of the practice by <add>on the part of</add> the Judge <del><gap/></del> is in the <unclear>nature</unclear><!-- could also be "ratio" or "nation" --> of the case dependent upon the act of an individual at <unclear>large</unclear> namely the applicant unless in the state of things as the others, calls upon the Judge to <del><gap/></del> to give exercise to his authority &#x2014; </p>
<p>In either of these cases the exercise of the practice by <add>on the part of</add> the Judge <del><gap/></del> is in the <unclear>nature</unclear><!-- could also be "ratio" or "nation" --> of the case dependent upon the act of an individual at <unclear>large</unclear> namely the applicant unless in the state of things as the others, calls upon the Judge to <del><gap/></del> to give exercise to his authority &#x2014; </p>

Revision as of 08:33, 29 March 2021

Click Here To Edit


1824. April 21 Constitutional Code.

IV Ch. 5. Judiciary Collectively §. indicate function

2

5 Art. 5. Difficult sometimes it may be to determine whether the imperfection is in the design or the expression. But so long as any person is at liberty to give indication of it in either case, no practical inconvenience can follow

Art. 5 In some cases it may be matter of more or less difficulty for a man to satisfy himself whether it is in the design or in the ordinance made in prosecution of it, that the supposed imperfection has its seat: but so long as in any case, any person who pleases is so inclined is at liberty to indicate the supposed imperfection, and propose what in his view of the matter is the most apt remedy, whatsoever be on this occasion the uncertainty, no practical inconvenience seems capable of liable to resulting from it.

6 Art. 6. Sole cases attended with material difference 1. Suggester, a Judge do not a Judge. 2. If a Judge, a Judge acting as such on the occasion in question; or not so acting: in which case he is on the footing of a non-Judge.

Art. 6 The differences and the only material differences seem to be those which regard the two following cases. 1. The person by whom the suggestion is made is he an individual other than the a Judge or is he the a Judge. If a Judge is he a Judge having actual experience of the matter, or a Judge at large: in which latter case the footing he stands upon in this respect is not very materially different from that of the an individual at large. 2. If a Judge having experience of the matter, it must be, as the consequence except where he of unless he be empowered to act spontaneously, be either in consequence of an act already instituted, in relation to the subject matter or antecedently to any such act already instituted.

In either of these cases the exercise of the practice by on the part of the Judge is in the nature of the case dependent upon the act of an individual at large namely the applicant unless in the state of things as the others, calls upon the Judge to to give exercise to his authority —

In this case, and in this alone, it is be preferred to issue, to the in form as well as in effect, a list of substantially valid power of legislation: the imitation at any rate, as so so far as conscionably what is made requested to be by an individual. It can be termed an imitation: to which it is required to add, in default of an imitation content as as the first of the legislation, this ensures .



Identifier: | JB/042/405/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1824-04-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

5-7

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

405

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

13328

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in