★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto upload |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | 1826. Nov.r 22d. | ||
Review of Humphreys | |||
Notaries | |||
— | |||
26. | |||
For appropriate aptitude | |||
in all branches in | |||
all Judges, my Constitutional | |||
Code provides | |||
<del>a<gap/></del> 40 distinguishable | |||
securities, and mercy scarce | |||
one of which, in any | |||
tolerably efficient degree, | |||
if at all, has | |||
place in the case of | |||
English Judges. | |||
Even without this | |||
new proposed security applying | |||
to a subordinate | |||
class of lawyers, | |||
these applying | |||
to the superordinate, | |||
would go near | |||
to suffice | |||
27. | |||
Mathematically | |||
speaking, given the | |||
nominees and superordinates, | |||
given are | |||
the Subordinates | |||
Are they no Mr. Canning? | |||
Are they not, Bathhurst? | |||
Are they not Lord Melville? | |||
Are they not Lord Liverpool? | |||
Are they not Ld. Eldom? | |||
GIven the L.d Liverpool's, | |||
given the Lord Melville's, | |||
given are not | |||
the Wallace's. | |||
Given the Wallace's, are they not given | |||
the Jeffreys<add>Sy<gap/></add> and the | |||
Bremmers? | |||
Notaries. | |||
28. | |||
Capable of being filled | |||
with virtue are Judge | |||
and Notary classes: | |||
In France, in consideration | |||
proportion is | |||
so the Judge, in lawyers | |||
the Notary Class. | |||
Incapable every where | |||
are in all but a consummate | |||
degree the advocate | |||
class. To sincerity necessity | |||
opposes her inexorable | |||
voice. | |||
29. | |||
Advocates and Mr B's | |||
profession of sincerity: | |||
admissions by those whose | |||
interests are served by | |||
their insincerity. | |||
Custom gives acceptance, | |||
nothing, truth. | |||
30. | |||
Circumstances make | |||
men: law, circumstances. | |||
See whether my Judges | |||
and notaries are not | |||
still better than the | |||
French. | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} |
1826. Nov.r 22d. Review of Humphreys Notaries — 26. For appropriate aptitude in all branches in all Judges, my Constitutional Code provides a 40 distinguishable securities, and mercy scarce one of which, in any tolerably efficient degree, if at all, has place in the case of English Judges.
Even without this new proposed security applying to a subordinate class of lawyers, these applying to the superordinate, would go near to suffice 27. Mathematically speaking, given the nominees and superordinates, given are the Subordinates Are they no Mr. Canning? Are they not, Bathhurst? Are they not Lord Melville? Are they not Lord Liverpool? Are they not Ld. Eldom? GIven the L.d Liverpool's, given the Lord Melville's, given are not the Wallace's. Given the Wallace's, are they not given the JeffreysSy and the Bremmers?
Notaries. 28. Capable of being filled with virtue are Judge and Notary classes: In France, in consideration proportion is so the Judge, in lawyers the Notary Class. Incapable every where are in all but a consummate degree the advocate class. To sincerity necessity opposes her inexorable voice.
29. Advocates and Mr B's profession of sincerity: admissions by those whose interests are served by their insincerity. Custom gives acceptance, nothing, truth. 30. Circumstances make men: law, circumstances. See whether my Judges and notaries are not still better than the French.
Identifier: | JB/078/021/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1826-11-22 |
26-30 |
||
078 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
021 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
001 |
Notaries |
||
Marginal summary sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
E3 |
||
25112 |
|||