★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto upload |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>3 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. 1826<lb/> | |||
Review of Sugden</head> | |||
Hitherto I have said judge made law; but this appellative<lb/> | |||
favorable as it is is still too favorable. Taken in the<lb/> | |||
strict sense judge made law would be the work either of<lb/> | |||
a monarchy or an oligarchy, according to the judicatory.<lb/> | |||
But in fact at the far greatest part of it has been the<lb/> | |||
the work of three estates: Judge or judges, one; Notetaker, two;<lb/> | |||
Publishing bookseller three: any one of the three judicatories<lb/> | |||
failing either the bill is not brought in or if brought in it<lb/> | |||
is lost: Unless a not taker is present | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
3 Decr. 1826
Review of Sugden
Hitherto I have said judge made law; but this appellative
favorable as it is is still too favorable. Taken in the
strict sense judge made law would be the work either of
a monarchy or an oligarchy, according to the judicatory.
But in fact at the far greatest part of it has been the
the work of three estates: Judge or judges, one; Notetaker, two;
Publishing bookseller three: any one of the three judicatories
failing either the bill is not brought in or if brought in it
is lost: Unless a not taker is present
|
Identifier: | JB/078/197/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1826-12-03 |
|||
|
078 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
|
197 |
Review of Sugden |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Copy/fair copy sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
25288 |
|||
