★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<head>Wrongful <add>murder</add> homicide — <del>and</del> Abortion.</head> | <head>Wrongful <add>murder</add> homicide — <del>and</del> Abortion.</head> | ||
In the Swedish code there is a chapter<lb/>with this title.<note>Cod. Leg. Succ. <gap/><lb/>1743 4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi>. Tit. de jure heriditane <lb/>cap. 6.<lb/> </note> "Let no one be heir to him<lb/>whom he has killed." The <del>general policy is </del> <add>idea is </add><del>evident:</del><lb/> that when one person <del>has been the</del> <add>to whom a benefit</add><lb/><del>cause of another's death</del> <add>is to devolve upon anothers death, has contributed to the<lb/>production of that event,</add> let there be <del>as such</del> <add>any rational</add><lb/><del>light</del> ground to apprehend that his conduct was<lb/>in any way influenced by the prospect of <del>the</del> <add>such</add><lb/><del>succession</del> <add>benefit</add> , he shall not be <sic>suffer'd</sic> to <del>enjoy the</del> <add>reap <del>a</del></add><lb/>profit <del>of</del> <add>by</add> his crime. <del>This is <add>that was</add> evident </del> That this<lb/>was the general policy is evident enough: though <add>but</add><lb/>the details do not <add>perhaps</add> in every particular <del>exactly </del> quadrate<lb/>with it: which is not at all to be <sic>wonder'd</sic><lb/>at considering the confusion in which the doctrine<lb/>of intentionality and consciousness remains hitherto involved. <note><del>It has been endeavoured</del> <add>An attempt to clear</add><lb/><del>to be cleared up</del> <add>it up may be seen</add><lb/>in Princ. of Legisl.<lb/>Intro. Ch.<lb/></note> <del>If</del> A parent who by excessive correction or <lb/>by culpable negligence is the cause of <add>occasions</add> the death of<lb/>his child is not to succeed <add>to any of the property of the child</add>: <del>no more is</del> a husband<lb/><del>to take</del> who by culpable negligence <add>his own fault</add> becomes the<lb/>author of his wife's death is in like manner excluded <add>debarred</add><lb/>from succeeding to her: as likewise is the<lb/>wife in like <add>similar</add> circumstances from succeeding to her <add>the</add><lb/>husband. If two persons who are remotely representatives <lb/>to each other<del>s</del> fight and kill<del>s</del> one ano<lb/><note>-ther</note><lb/><pb/> | In the Swedish code there is a chapter<lb/>with this title.<note>Cod. Leg. Succ. <gap/><lb/>1743 4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi>. Tit. de jure <unclear>heriditane</unclear> <lb/>cap. 6.<lb/> </note> "Let no one be heir to him<lb/>whom he has killed." The <del>general policy is </del> <add>idea is </add><del>evident:</del><lb/> that when one person <del>has been the</del> <add>to whom a benefit</add><lb/><del>cause of another's death</del> <add>is to devolve upon anothers death, has contributed to the<lb/>production of that event,</add> let there be <del>as such</del> <add>any rational</add><lb/><del>light</del> ground to apprehend that his conduct was<lb/>in any way influenced by the prospect of <del>the</del> <add>such</add><lb/><del>succession</del> <add>benefit</add> , he shall not be <sic>suffer'd</sic> to <del>enjoy the</del> <add>reap <del>a</del></add><lb/>profit <del>of</del> <add>by</add> his crime. <del>This is <add>that was</add> evident </del> That this<lb/>was the general policy is evident enough: though <add>but</add><lb/>the details do not <add>perhaps</add> in every particular <del>exactly </del> quadrate<lb/>with it: which is not at all to be <sic>wonder'd</sic><lb/>at considering the confusion in which the doctrine<lb/>of intentionality and consciousness remains hitherto involved. <note><del>It has been endeavoured</del> <add>An attempt to clear</add><lb/><del>to be cleared up</del> <add>it up may be seen</add><lb/>in Princ. of Legisl.<lb/>Intro. Ch.<lb/></note> <del>If</del> A parent who by excessive correction or <lb/>by culpable negligence is the cause of <add>occasions</add> the death of<lb/>his child is not to succeed <add>to any of the property of the child</add>: <del>no more is</del> a husband<lb/><del>to take</del> who by culpable negligence <add>his own fault</add> becomes the<lb/>author of his wife's death is in like manner excluded <add>debarred</add><lb/>from succeeding to her: as likewise is the<lb/>wife in like <add>similar</add> circumstances from succeeding to her <add>the</add><lb/>husband. If two persons who are remotely representatives <lb/>to each other<del>s</del> fight and kill<del>s</del> one ano<lb/><note>-ther</note><lb/><pb/> | ||
Indirect Legislation
Non Seduction
1
Wrongful murder homicide — and Abortion.
In the Swedish code there is a chapter
with this title.Cod. Leg. Succ.
1743 4th. Tit. de jure heriditane
cap. 6.
"Let no one be heir to him
whom he has killed." The general policy is idea is evident:
that when one person has been the to whom a benefit
cause of another's death is to devolve upon anothers death, has contributed to the
production of that event, let there be as such any rational
light ground to apprehend that his conduct was
in any way influenced by the prospect of the such
succession benefit , he shall not be suffer'd to enjoy the reap a
profit of by his crime. This is that was evident That this
was the general policy is evident enough: though but
the details do not perhaps in every particular exactly quadrate
with it: which is not at all to be wonder'd
at considering the confusion in which the doctrine
of intentionality and consciousness remains hitherto involved. It has been endeavoured An attempt to clear
to be cleared up it up may be seen
in Princ. of Legisl.
Intro. Ch.
If A parent who by excessive correction or
by culpable negligence is the cause of occasions the death of
his child is not to succeed to any of the property of the child: no more is a husband
to take who by culpable negligence his own fault becomes the
author of his wife's death is in like manner excluded debarred
from succeeding to her: as likewise is the
wife in like similar circumstances from succeeding to her the
husband. If two persons who are remotely representatives
to each others fight and kills one ano
-ther
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/087/046/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
087 |
indirect legislation |
||
|
046 |
indirect legislation |
||
|
001 |
/wrongful homicide/ murder/ and abortion |
||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
|
27571 |
|||
