JB/109/009/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/109/009/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/109/009/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
(No difference)

Revision as of 10:06, 27 October 2020

Click Here To Edit

If i

If it be clearcertain, that the party by whom the transcript is proffered
had no sharebore no part, directly or indirectly, in the processing destruction of the original
fraud seems almost entirely altogether out of the question. The In this case the
only chanceprobability<add>danger</add> in favour of infidelity depends upon the existence Queen Square 81
Queen Square 16
Square 8 5
Square
Square

---page break---
and influence of sinister interest on the part of the transcriber, orand
examiner. But, if in as much as by the supposition it was understood
by both the transcript would not be original, so long as the original were in existence, nor foreseen by them
as an event in any degree probable, that the original would
parish before the transcript the utmost degree of the case affords no
reasonable ground for the supposition of fraud, even supposing the
untrustworthiness of the transcriber or examiner, or both, to be in the
highest pitch imaginable.

The only foundation on which any form suspicion of
infidelity on the part of the transcript can be built, is the supposition that of
that the party by whom haddepositionperishing of the original may have had
for its cause the act of the party by whom the transcript is proffered in evidence.
But in this caseon this supposition, the transcript must have undergone an alteration
in the way of forgery, viz: either at a time subsequently to the deposition
that is in this case the destruction of the original or previously
in contemplation of and in preparation for that event: and for these
purposes not only must the transcript have been in his custody
or that of his agent in the forgery, but the have been either in his custody, or, so far at least as was necessary
for the purpose of destruction, in his power.




Identifier: | JB/109/009/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 109.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

109

Main Headings

Evidence

Folio number

009

Info in main headings field

Evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

35664

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in