JB/147/086/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/147/086/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/147/086/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p><gap/> only a few <gap/> <hi rend="underline">six</hi> thus the observation &#x2014; not<lb/>
<p>It is only a far as investing <hi rend="underline">six</hi> that this observation &#x2014; not<lb/>
included in the proceeding one.</p>
included in the proceeding one.</p>


<p>But where six <gap/> <del>ger<gap/></del><add>really </add> a real course of unfitness<lb/>
<p>But where six <gap/> <del>ger<gap/></del><add>really </add> a real course of unfitness<lb/>
and <add>or</add> generally recognized <add>regarded</add> as such <add>[+] it seems</add> I see<lb/>
and <add>or</add> <unclear>generally</unclear> recognized <add>regarded</add> as such <add>[+] it seems</add> I see<lb/>
<add>difficult to say</add> not why the <add>a grant made to a Lady</add> grant of the reversion of the office <note><add>[+]</add> as is the case with<lb/>
<add>difficult to say</add> not why the <add>a grant made to a Lady</add> grant of the reversion of the office <note><add>[+]</add> as is the case with<lb/>
public office in general<lb/>
public office in general<lb/>
Line 17: Line 17:
by the holder of the office<lb/>
by the holder of the office<lb/>
saving three exceptions<lb/>
saving three exceptions<lb/>
there is any thing to  
there is any thing to <lb/>
d<gap/> for.</note><lb/>
do for it.</note><lb/>
should make less sensation than <del>the</del><add>a</add> grant <del>if the</del> made<lb/>
should make less sensation than <del>the</del><add>a</add> grant <del>if the</del> made<lb/>
of the same office to the same Lady to take effect<lb/>
of the same office to the same Lady to take effect<lb/>
Line 31: Line 31:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 10:03, 29 October 2020

Click Here To Edit

It is only a far as investing six that this observation — not
included in the proceeding one.

But where six gerreally a real course of unfitness
and or generally recognized regarded as such [+] it seems I see
difficult to say not why the a grant made to a Lady grant of the reversion of the office [+] as is the case with
public office in general
with a very fine and
particular exception
when it is regarded
as a cause of unfitness
with respect to the holding
of office, that is whom
by the holder of the office
saving three exceptions
there is any thing to
do for it.

should make less sensation than thea grant if the made
of the same office to the same Lady to take effect
immediately.

Thus much as to for unfitness having the circumstance
of sex for its cause and where this cause is laid
out of the case consideration this third argument reason will be foundseen to
with and stand be included in the second.




Identifier: | JB/147/086/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 147.

Date_1

1810-03-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

12 continued, 13

Box

147

Main Headings

Sinecures

Folio number

086

Info in main headings field

Sinecures &c

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

D7 / E7

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

49311

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in