JB/087/158/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/087/158/003: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
<note>Corpus delicti</note>
<note>Corpus delicti</note>


<p>3.  It matters not much whether each of them knows<lb/>that <del>their</del> rest are of the <del><gap/></del> others being called in<lb/> If no one knows but that any other number of persons<lb/>may also have been called in it will be a<lb/>great discouragement to his forming any plan of<lb/>prevarication, since he will not know but that there <add>he</add><lb/>may be ever so many other to contradict him.  On<lb/>the other hand <add><del>to</del></add> this uncertainty may [by accident] <note>in the event of the deeds <lb/>getting into dishonest<lb/> hands<lb/></note>upon occasion to the adding an unlimited number of<lb/>false witnesses to contradict what shall be advanced<lb/>by the true.  Moreover when dishonest is out of<lb/>the question, a person at a long interval of time<lb/>is less likely to forget the circumstance of his having<lb/>been called in as a <add>subscribing</add> witness if others were present<lb/>in the same capacity than if nobody had been<lb/>present but the party or parties: every person who<lb/>is present so <del>they</del> the number <del>of persons</del> be not so<lb/>great as to form a crowd, affording an additional<lb/>memento, and if one should happen to mistake or to<lb/>forget, another may correct or refresh his memory. <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi><note>(a) This is the reason for<lb/>which Mahomet recommends<lb/> the getting one man and two women<lb/>for witnesses, where two<lb/>men are not to be had: <lb/>ib.<lb/></note></p><p>4. Where the deed <add>document</add> consists of <del>a numb</del> more sheets<lb/>or such like pieces than one let each piece be<lb/>subscribed as well by the <add>attesting</add> witnesses as by the <add>party or</add> parties.<lb/>As often as any erasure <add>alteration or interlineation</add> happens to be made<lb/>let the party or parties take notice thereof by <del>the</del><lb/>writing the initials of their names at the end <add>in the margin</add> of the<lb/> <note>line</note><lb/></p>
<p>3.  It matters not much whether each of them knows<lb/>that <del>these</del> rest are of the <del><gap/></del> others being called in<lb/> If no one knows but that any other number of persons<lb/>may also have been called in it will be a<lb/>great discouragement to his forming any plan of<lb/>prevarication, since he will not know but that there <add>he</add><lb/>may be ever so many others to contradict him.  On<lb/>the other hand <note>in the event of the deeds <lb/>getting into dishonest<lb/> hands<lb/></note> this uncertainty may [by accident]<lb/> give occasion to the adding an unlimited number of<lb/>false witnesses to contradict what shall be advanced<lb/>by the true.  Moreover when dishonesty is out of<lb/>the question, a person at a long interval of time<lb/>is less likely to forget the circumstance of his having<lb/>been called in as a <add>subscribing</add> witness if others were present<lb/>in the same capacity than if nobody had been<lb/>present but the party or parties: every person who<lb/>is present so <del>they</del> the number <del>of persons</del> be not so<lb/>great as to form a crowd, affording an additional<lb/>memento, and if one should happen to mistake or to<lb/>forget, another may correct or refresh his memory. <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi><lb/><note>(a) This is the reason for<lb/>which Mahomet recommends<lb/> the getting one man and two women<lb/>for witnesses, where two<lb/>men are not to be had: <lb/>ib.<lb/></note></p><p>4. Where the deed <add>document</add> consists of <del>a numb</del> more sheets<lb/>or such like pieces than one let each piece be<lb/>subscribed as well by the <add>attesting</add> witnesses as by the <add>party or</add> parties.<lb/>As often as any erasure <add>alteration or interlineation</add> happens to be made<lb/>let the party or parties take notice thereof by <del>the</del><lb/>writing the initials of their names <add>in the margin</add> at the end  of the<lb/> <note>line</note><lb/></p>





Revision as of 21:08, 10 December 2020

Click Here To Edit

3

Indirect

Corpus delicti

3. It matters not much whether each of them knows
that these rest are of the others being called in
If no one knows but that any other number of persons
may also have been called in it will be a
great discouragement to his forming any plan of
prevarication, since he will not know but that there he
may be ever so many others to contradict him. On
the other hand in the event of the deeds
getting into dishonest
hands
this uncertainty may [by accident]
give occasion to the adding an unlimited number of
false witnesses to contradict what shall be advanced
by the true. Moreover when dishonesty is out of
the question, a person at a long interval of time
is less likely to forget the circumstance of his having
been called in as a subscribing witness if others were present
in the same capacity than if nobody had been
present but the party or parties: every person who
is present so they the number of persons be not so
great as to form a crowd, affording an additional
memento, and if one should happen to mistake or to
forget, another may correct or refresh his memory. (a)
(a) This is the reason for
which Mahomet recommends
the getting one man and two women
for witnesses, where two
men are not to be had:
ib.

4. Where the deed document consists of a numb more sheets
or such like pieces than one let each piece be
subscribed as well by the attesting witnesses as by the party or parties.
As often as any erasure alteration or interlineation happens to be made
let the party or parties take notice thereof by the
writing the initials of their names in the margin at the end of the
line




















Identifier: | JB/087/158/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

087

Main Headings

indirect legislation

Folio number

158

Info in main headings field

indirect

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

27683

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in