JB/011/240/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/011/240/001: Difference between revisions

JMagnus (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/011/240/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
(No difference)

Revision as of 04:53, 23 July 2021

Click Here To Edit

17 - 1827

Sir,

I take great blame to myself for having so long omitted to acknowledge the very sensible letter which you addressed to me on the 27 Nov - and to thank you for the suggestions respecting the Larceny Bill by which your Letter was accompanied.

I shall very shortly have an opportunity of reviewing in detail with the legal authorities whom I am in the habit of consulting — the various clauses of the consolidated Larceny Bill — and I beg to assure you that which of the with which you have favoured me, thank




Identifier: | JB/011/240/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1827-01-17

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

240

Info in main headings field

peel to g. bentham (copy)

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

richard doane

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[motif with tb monogram]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

3937

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in