JB/122/374/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/122/374/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/122/374/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
<!-- header in pencil -->
<!-- header in pencil -->


<p>6 May 1813 +<lb/><sic>Panopt.</sic> Compensation Claim <note>&sect;&sect;.4. Profit for Inventions</note><lb/>6</p> <p>On this occasion, so much having been said of the<lb/><del>uses to which</del> <hi rend="underline">extent</hi>, <del>to</del> which in the way of practical<lb/><hi rend="underline">use</hi>, and thence naturally in the way of <hi rend="underline">profit</hi> to the<lb/>persons concerned <add>the inventions</add><del>as in the inventors, the works <add>operations</add> in question</del><lb/><del>might have been</del> <add>in question</add> were in their nature susceptible <lb/>at the same time that, <del>it is also said <add>stated</add> </del> on the other hand,<lb/>it has also been stated, viz. as in the Act <add>(52.G.3.c.44)</add> (&sect;&sect;.4) what <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>"by reason of such<lb/>"transference" (viz to<lb/>the purpose of the "employment<lb/>to be given"<lb/>under the Contract "to<lb/>"Convicts" <hi rend="underline">no advantage</hi>"<lb/>(from the capital and<lb/>inventions in question)<lb/>"therefore could or can<lb/>"now be draped"</note><lb/><!-- deletion of this line in pencil --><del>no such <add>profit, nor</add> <hi rend="underline">use</hi> has actually been made of them, several<lb/>questions present themselves as</del> hence it is that to a<lb/><del>reasonable</del> <add>judiciary</add> mind, viewing the matter for the situation in which<lb/>it will be viewed by my Arbitrators, <del>a sort of apparent</del> <add>the case may perhaps</add><lb/><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> likely to present <gap/>, not<lb/>an inconsistency, which</del> <add>present the idea of an inconsistency, such as</add> until it is cleared up, <del>will be</del> <add>may seem</add><lb/><del>apt to present itself as appearing</del> <add>to appear</add> a bar to any claim<lb/>on the ground at least, considered as separate from the<lb/>ground of the Contract, <add>as below</add> <!-- deletion in pencil --><del>which will in the next and last place<lb/><add>be brought to view.</add></del></p> <p>To any such idea, expression will I imagine be found to be given <note>nor that an inadequate<lb/>one, by those questions</note><lb/>of any such inconsistency the <add><gap/></add> idea will naturally <add>may receive what</add><lb/><add>I flatter myself will be found a not inapposite or inadequate</add><lb/>find expression in two or three not one obvious question<</del><lb/><del>together with</del> which I shall proceed to state, together with such<lb/><!-- deletion in pencil --> <del>more answers as I am able and as it seems necessary<lb/>for me to give</del>, answers on the <del>state</del> <add>nature</add> of the case <del>calls</del> <add>appears to call</add> for<lb/><del>on my part</del> at my hands, and <del>enables</del> <add>the facts in it enable</add> me to give.</p>     
<p>6 May 1813 +<lb/><sic>Panopt.</sic> Compensation Claim <note>&sect;&sect;.4. Profit for Inventions</note><lb/>6</p> <p>On this occasion, so much having been said of the<lb/><del>uses to which</del> <hi rend="underline">extent</hi>, <del>to</del> which in the way of practical<lb/><hi rend="underline">use</hi>, and thence naturally in the way of <hi rend="underline">profit</hi> to the<lb/>persons concerned <add>the inventions</add><del>as in the inventions, the works <add>operations</add> in question</del><lb/><del>might have been</del> <add>in question</add> were in their nature susceptible of,<lb/>at the same time that, <del>it is also said <add>stated</add></del> on the other hand,<lb/>it has also been stated, viz. as in the Act <add>(52.G.3.c.44)</add> (&sect;&sect;.4) what <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>"<hi rend="underline">by reason of such<lb/>"transference</hi>" (viz to<lb/>the purpose of the "employment<lb/>to be given"<lb/>under the Contract "to<lb/>"Convicts" <hi rend="underline">no advantage</hi>"<lb/>(from the capital and<lb/>inventions in question)<lb/>"<hi rend="underline">therefore could or can<lb/>"now be draped</hi>"</note><lb/><!-- deletion of this line in pencil --><del>no such <add>profit, nor</add> <hi rend="underline">use</hi> has actually been made of them, several<lb/>questions present themselves as</del> hence it is that to a<lb/><del>reasonable</del> <add>judiciary</add> mind, viewing the matter from the situation in which<lb/>it will be viewed by my Arbitrators, <del>a sort of apparent</del> <add>the case may perhaps</add><lb/><del>inconsistency seems to me as likely to present itself, not<lb/>an inconsistency, which</del> <add>present the idea of an inconsistency, such as</add> until it is cleared up, <del>will be</del> <add>may seem</add><lb/><del>apt to present itself as appearing</del> <add>to appear</add> a bar to any claim<lb/>on this ground at least, considered as separate from the<lb/>ground of the Contract, <add>as below</add> <!-- deletion in pencil --><del>which will in the next and last place<lb/><add>be brought to view.</add></del></p> <p>To any such idea, expression will I imagine be found to be given <note>nor that an inadequate<lb/>one, by those questions</note><lb/><del>of any such inconsistency the <add><gap/></add> idea will naturally <add>may receive what</add><lb/><add>I flatter myself will be found a not inapposite or inadequate</add><lb/>find expression in two or three not one obvious question,</del><lb/><del>together with</del> which I shall proceed to state, together with such<lb/><!-- deletion in pencil --> <del>more answers as I am able and as it seems necessary<lb/>for me to give</del>, answers as the <del>state</del> <add>nature</add> of the case <del>calls</del> <add>appears to call</add> for<lb/><del>on my part</del> at my hands, and <del>enables</del> <add>the facts in it enable</add> me to give.</p>     


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 12:07, 15 February 2021

'Click Here To Edit


6 May 1813 +
Panopt. Compensation Claim §§.4. Profit for Inventions
6

On this occasion, so much having been said of the
uses to which extent, to which in the way of practical
use, and thence naturally in the way of profit to the
persons concerned the inventionsas in the inventions, the works operations in question
might have been in question were in their nature susceptible of,
at the same time that, it is also said stated on the other hand,
it has also been stated, viz. as in the Act (52.G.3.c.44) (§§.4) what [+] "by reason of such
"transference
" (viz to
the purpose of the "employment
to be given"
under the Contract "to
"Convicts" no advantage"
(from the capital and
inventions in question)
"therefore could or can
"now be draped
"

no such profit, nor use has actually been made of them, several
questions present themselves as
hence it is that to a
reasonable judiciary mind, viewing the matter from the situation in which
it will be viewed by my Arbitrators, a sort of apparent the case may perhaps
inconsistency seems to me as likely to present itself, not
an inconsistency, which
present the idea of an inconsistency, such as until it is cleared up, will be may seem
apt to present itself as appearing to appear a bar to any claim
on this ground at least, considered as separate from the
ground of the Contract, as below which will in the next and last place
be brought to view.

To any such idea, expression will I imagine be found to be given nor that an inadequate
one, by those questions

of any such inconsistency the idea will naturally may receive what
I flatter myself will be found a not inapposite or inadequate
find expression in two or three not one obvious question,

together with which I shall proceed to state, together with such
more answers as I am able and as it seems necessary
for me to give
, answers as the state nature of the case calls appears to call for
on my part at my hands, and enables the facts in it enable me to give.



Identifier: | JB/122/374/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1813-05-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

374

Info in main headings field

Panopt. Compensation Claim

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

C6

Penner

Watermarks

JOHN DICKINSON & C<…> 1809

Marginals

Paper Producer

A. Levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1809

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in