JB/078/022/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/078/022/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


1826. Novr. 30.
<p>1826. Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. 30.</p>
Review of Humphreys
<head>Review of Humphreys</head>


S.III. Marriage Settlement.
<p>S.III. Marriage Settlem<hi rend="superscript">t</hi>.</p>
or 1.
<p>or 1.</p>
As per usage, H. gives
<p>As per usage, H. gives<lb/>
the estate undivided
the estate undivided<lb/>
to the eldest son, failing
to the eldest son, failing<lb/>
sons and other
sons and other<lb/>
daughters, to a daughter.
daughters, to a daughter.</p>
<p>Not otherwise could<lb/>
he have done without<lb/>
wounding selfish pride<lb/>
of those on whom adoption<lb/>
depends.</p>
<p>Whether greatest happiness<lb/>
principle dictates<lb/>
this, J.B. is not<lb/>
absolutely prepared to<lb/>
say.</p>
<p>or 2.</p>
<p>Per happiness principle,<lb/>
better the title of youngest:<lb/>
than the elder,<lb/>
having had the longer<lb/>
time for providing for <lb/>
themselves.</p>
<p>or 3.</p>
<p>So of weaker sex<lb/>
than stronger.</p>
<p>or 4.</p>
<p>Individuals, individually<lb/>
considered, deterioration<lb/>
in value<lb/>
would sooner or later<lb/>
be produced by<lb/>
division.</p>
<p>or 5.</p>
<p>But not less in female<lb/>
than male<lb/>
hands would this<lb/>
deterioration have<lb/>
place.</p>
<p>True, of the aggregate<lb/>
number of cases,<lb/>
greater is the proportion<lb/>
of those in which<lb/>
there are females alone;<lb/>
added to those in which<lb/>
<pb/>


Not otherwise could
<p>S.III. Marriage Settlement</p>
he have done without
<p>or 5 contin<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.</p>
wounding selfish pride
than of those in which<lb/>
of those on whom adoption
there are none but males;<lb/>
depends.
<del>by</del> but by this, inconsistency<lb/>
is not disproved;<lb/>
only the result of it lessened.</p>
<p>or 6.</p>
<p>As between male and<lb/>
female, in regard to<lb/>
strength, the less the<lb/>
care taken by <hi rend="underline">nature</hi><lb/>
the greater should be<lb/>
that taken by law.</p>
<p>or 7.</p>
<p>In feudal time, reason<lb/>
good: estates to males<lb/>
entire, for better equipment<lb/>
for national defence:<lb/>
<add>and aggression:</add> to females in<lb/>
shares, that on marriage<lb/>
each might help<lb/>
equip so many defenders.</p>
<p>or 8.</p>
<p>Now, the reason evaporated,<lb/>
remains the efficient<lb/>
cause - the power<lb/>
of the males - (sole<lb/>
exception )<lb/>
final cause, greatest<lb/>
happiness of the stronger:<lb/>
a <hi rend="underline">neuter</hi> would<lb/>
determine it in  favour<lb/>
of the weaker</p>
<p>or 9</p>
So a Thalestrls Bonapatre,<lb/>
in default of conquest and other amusement, taking the fancy to maximize happiness
and justice.
Self regard, regardless
of justice produced the
general rule: accident
and the goose like fathers
the leader principle,
the exceptions.


Whether greatest happiness
S.III. Marriage settlement
principle dictates
or 10.
this, J.B. is not
Historical cause of
absolutely prepared to
the general rule: Eldest
say.
son most commonly
or 2.
fittest for war.
Per happiness principle,
Cause of Borough English
better the title of youngest:
exception, some
than the elder,
accidental superior
having had the longer
aptitude in a younger.
time for providing for
or 11.
themselves.
Of sole
cause, the more female
proprietors, the
more saleable to males
fo so
for their war service.
or 12.
Males could not so
easily and cheaply betrained
from birth to
21. as famales sold at
16.
or 13.
By division among
sons, the property wd.
have been reduced to
unserviceable masses.
or 14.
For England I bequeath
the proposed measure
to the next Elizabeth:
for Russia, to next
Catherine.  In a
small chance for
it.
15.
As to divisibility, cause
of Miss Campbell's preplexity
not author,
nor Reviewer, but Law.
Legislator's law in the
barbarous ages, Judge
made law in all
ages.
16.
Political economy and
law
out of the question,
questions two only
partition on non partition
for both sexes.<pb/>


or 3.
Formula
So of weaker sex
Ch.&sect; III. Marriage Settlement.
than stronger.
&sect;. Notes on Revision Draught
Divin <gap/> <gap/> Indivisibility
Political economy may
decide in favour either
of partibility or non partibility
18.
But setting political
economy aside, great would be the simplicity
and intelligibility
if either were made
the general rule, leaving
it to modifications
within prescribed bounds,
by parties, according to
their mutual wishes.


or 4.
Individuals, individually
considered, deterioration
in value
would sooner or later
be produced by
division.
or 5.
But not less in female
than male
hands would this
deterioration have
place.
True, of the aggregate
number of cases,
greater is the proportion
of those in which
there are females alone;
added to those in which
<pb/>
S.III. Marriage Settlement
or 5 contind.
than of those in which
there are none but males;
by but by this, inconsistency
is not disproved;
only the result of it lessened.
or 6.
As between male and
female, in regard to
strength, the less the
care taken by nature
the greater should be
that taken by law.
or 7.
In feudal time, reason
good: estates to males
entire, for better equipment
for national defence:<lb/>
<add>and aggression:</add> to females in
shares, that on marriage
each might help
equip so many defenders.


or 8.
Now, the reason evaporated,
remains the efficient
cause - the power
of the males - (sole
exception )
final cause, greatest
happiness of the stronger:
a neuter would
determine it in  favour
of the weaker


or 9
So a Thalestrls Bonapatre,





Revision as of 09:00, 19 April 2021

Click Here To Edit

1826. Novr. 30.

Review of Humphreys

S.III. Marriage Settlemt.

or 1.

As per usage, H. gives
the estate undivided
to the eldest son, failing
sons and other
daughters, to a daughter.

Not otherwise could
he have done without
wounding selfish pride
of those on whom adoption
depends.

Whether greatest happiness
principle dictates
this, J.B. is not
absolutely prepared to
say.

or 2.

Per happiness principle,
better the title of youngest:
than the elder,
having had the longer
time for providing for
themselves.

or 3.

So of weaker sex
than stronger.

or 4.

Individuals, individually
considered, deterioration
in value
would sooner or later
be produced by
division.

or 5.

But not less in female
than male
hands would this
deterioration have
place.

True, of the aggregate
number of cases,
greater is the proportion
of those in which
there are females alone;
added to those in which

---page break---

S.III. Marriage Settlement

or 5 contind.

than of those in which
there are none but males;
by but by this, inconsistency
is not disproved;

only the result of it lessened.

or 6.

As between male and
female, in regard to
strength, the less the
care taken by nature
the greater should be
that taken by law.

or 7.

In feudal time, reason
good: estates to males
entire, for better equipment
for national defence:
and aggression: to females in
shares, that on marriage
each might help
equip so many defenders.

or 8.

Now, the reason evaporated,
remains the efficient
cause - the power
of the males - (sole
exception )
final cause, greatest
happiness of the stronger:
a neuter would
determine it in favour
of the weaker

or 9

So a Thalestrls Bonapatre,
in default of conquest and other amusement, taking the fancy to maximize happiness and justice. Self regard, regardless of justice produced the general rule: accident and the goose like fathers the leader principle, the exceptions.

S.III. Marriage settlement or 10. Historical cause of the general rule: Eldest son most commonly fittest for war. Cause of Borough English exception, some accidental superior aptitude in a younger. or 11. Of sole cause, the more female proprietors, the more saleable to males fo so for their war service. or 12. Males could not so easily and cheaply betrained from birth to 21. as famales sold at 16. or 13. By division among sons, the property wd. have been reduced to unserviceable masses. or 14. For England I bequeath the proposed measure to the next Elizabeth: for Russia, to next Catherine. In a small chance for it. 15. As to divisibility, cause of Miss Campbell's preplexity not author, nor Reviewer, but Law. Legislator's law in the barbarous ages, Judge made law in all ages. 16. Political economy and law out of the question, questions two only partition on non partition for both sexes.
---page break---

Formula Ch.§ III. Marriage Settlement. §. Notes on Revision Draught Divin Indivisibility Political economy may decide in favour either of partibility or non partibility 18. But setting political economy aside, great would be the simplicity and intelligibility if either were made the general rule, leaving it to modifications within prescribed bounds, by parties, according to their mutual wishes.










Identifier: | JB/078/022/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.

Date_1

1826-11-30

Marginal Summary Numbering

or 1 - or 14, 15-16

Box

078

Main Headings

Review of Humphreys

Folio number

022

Info in main headings field

Review of Humphreys

Image

001

Titles

III Marriage settlement

Category

Marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25113

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in