JB/106/095/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/095/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/095/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/095/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>March 1807<lb/>
<p><!-- pencil -->March 1807<lb/>
Judicial Justice</p>
Judicial Justice</p>
In the character of a precedent, capable of forming the<lb/>
<p>In the character of a precedent, capable of forming the<lb/>
matter of a rule of law – of jurisprudential law – <unclear>preferment</unclear><lb/>
matter of a rule of law – of jurisprudential law – <unclear>preferment</unclear><lb/>
in <unclear>extent</unclear> to a  
in <unclear>extent</unclear> to a <gap/> Statute or <del>writ</del> were to a multitude<lb/>
 
of  <gap/> the importance of a division to the public at large<lb/>
 
has no dependance upon, no connection with its importance<lb/>
 
<add>to</add> relation to the parties.  A decision of the most extensive<lb/>
 
applicability may <del>as well</del> have for its subject matter<lb/>
a hovel not worth 20<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> a year as the <del>what</del> <add>£180,000 a year said to have composed the</add> Bridgewater<lb/>
estate.  Meeting with opulence on the part of both parties<lb/>
and a temperament of sufficient sensibility on the part of the <unclear>Law</unclear><lb/>
a cause being <unclear>referenced</unclear> misdecision in a Court below<lb/>
ascends to the House of Lords, and there the misdecision receives<lb/>
due correction.  Failing to meet with sufficient opulence<lb/>
<add>or sensibility</add> on the part of <del>the</del> him who should have been plaintiff<lb/>
it now <del>ceases</del> <add>finds its way</add> into my Court.  Decided in a Court below<lb/>
and decided wrong, if the requisite quantum either of affluence <add>opulence</add><lb/>
or sensibility finds on the part of the loswer, <del>the <gap/></del> erroneous<lb/>
decision of the Court <del>the</del> below is submitted to and becomes <unclear>true</unclear>.</p>
<p>In The case of <unclear>Perrin</unclear> and <unclear>Blake</unclear> the was the want of<lb/>
affluence:  in the Courts below it was argued and argued,<lb/>
Westminster Hall was <add>kept</add> burning with <unclear>horned</unclear> zeal from one<lb/>
end to the other.  It received one decision at an end of the Hall,<lb/>
an opposite decision at the opposite end.  Had sensibility concerned<lb/>
with affluence, <add>the cause would have defended to the highest rigor, and</add> the law on that important head could have been fixed:<lb/>
but moderation trumpeted over sensibility, the cause was compromised,<lb/>
the existing fellowship of horned gentlemen robbed by the<lb/>
niggardliness of the  parties of their expected due, and the question left<lb/>
in the condition of a closed or deserted gold-<unclear>town</unclear>, waiting to be reopened<lb/>
for the benefit of future <unclear>harmony</unclear> by the avidity of future suitors.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 02:30, 18 December 2021

Click Here To Edit

March 1807
Judicial Justice

In the character of a precedent, capable of forming the
matter of a rule of law – of jurisprudential law – preferment
in extent to a Statute or writ were to a multitude
of the importance of a division to the public at large
has no dependance upon, no connection with its importance
to relation to the parties. A decision of the most extensive
applicability may as well have for its subject matter
a hovel not worth 20s a year as the what £180,000 a year said to have composed the Bridgewater
estate. Meeting with opulence on the part of both parties
and a temperament of sufficient sensibility on the part of the Law
a cause being referenced misdecision in a Court below
ascends to the House of Lords, and there the misdecision receives
due correction. Failing to meet with sufficient opulence
or sensibility on the part of the him who should have been plaintiff
it now ceases finds its way into my Court. Decided in a Court below
and decided wrong, if the requisite quantum either of affluence opulence
or sensibility finds on the part of the loswer, the erroneous
decision of the Court the below is submitted to and becomes true.

In The case of Perrin and Blake the was the want of
affluence: in the Courts below it was argued and argued,
Westminster Hall was kept burning with horned zeal from one
end to the other. It received one decision at an end of the Hall,
an opposite decision at the opposite end. Had sensibility concerned
with affluence, the cause would have defended to the highest rigor, and the law on that important head could have been fixed:
but moderation trumpeted over sensibility, the cause was compromised,
the existing fellowship of horned gentlemen robbed by the
niggardliness of the parties of their expected due, and the question left
in the condition of a closed or deserted gold-town, waiting to be reopened
for the benefit of future harmony by the avidity of future suitors.


Identifier: | JB/106/095/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-03-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

31-33

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

095

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e11

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34683

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in