JB/042/134/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/134/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1825 Dieu 16. <add>Part of</add>One revision employed <add>in Ch. X!! add<gap/><del></add> <gap/> call ammendments</del>.</head>
<head>1825 Dieu 16. <add>Part of</add>One revision employed <add>in Ch. X!! add<gap/></add> <del><gap/> call ammendments</del>.</head>


<p>Constitutional Code</p>
<p>Constitutional Code</p>
Ch.XII, Judiciary Collectively.
S.356 Judicatories <gap/>.
Account and Claim
Common properties
1. Antagonization without
contestation.
2. Evidence written:
unsword, uncounter
interrogated: this a
voucher.
2
Anglice, Judicatory imperfect:
Judge: Advocate
in accounts for
pursuer:
in claims,
for Defendant
3.
COde 3.
1. A. has intrusted to
B. money &amp;c. in large
masses, to be disposed
of in small. B. accounts
by shoing the disposal,
Judicatory here an
audit.
2 A. has in hand money
&amp;c in a large mass,
to be disposed of in
small claimants,
they showing their
grounds - Judicatory
here a Court of Claims.
3. A &amp; B. have each disposed
of money &amp;c for
the benefit each of the
other, in sums large
or small: this to be
shewn by each. Judicatories
for these, the
oordinary ones.
4.
Government giving out
and holding money
&amp; in the largest masses
and in such Audit
Courts &amp; Courts of Claims
as have been established,
Government
has been a party, appointing
also the Judge
or Judges.<pb/>
Ch.XII. Judiciary Collectively.
S.2436 Judicatories &amp;c
Account and Claim
For a perfectly composed
Judicatory,
need greater here than
in ordinary cases.
1. Interests at stake greater.
2. So, exposure to fraud
and oppression.
6.
Cause of the omission.
The Judge, being its instrument,
Government
needs no Advocate.
7.
Secure the locators
regard themselves of
the fidelity of their instrument:
viz to their
particular interests.
2. To d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>.: of Government
in so far as it agrees
with <sic>their's</sic>.
8.
Cause why Governmt.
is left without an advocate.
He, having to
give reasons openly,
could give none but
such as pleaded for the
public, and could
not for any sinister
interest or wish of the
locatory - the Advocate
being omitted, any ruler
can whisper wishes
to any Judge.
9.
Hence, people's interest
requires constant
ministry of a Government
Advocate.
Ruler's sinister interest,
the constant absence.<pb/>
Ch. XII. Judicary Collectively.
S.25.36 Judicatories &amp;c
Account and Claim
10.
11. So an Eleemosynary
Advocate.
2. For check on Judge
as in all cases.
2. Because, in both
cases, there may be individuals
unable to
defray the expence of
the means of justice:
in particular, means





Revision as of 10:06, 15 May 2021

Click Here To Edit

1825 Dieu 16. Part ofOne revision employed in Ch. X!! add call ammendments.

Constitutional Code

Ch.XII, Judiciary Collectively. S.356 Judicatories . Account and Claim Common properties 1. Antagonization without contestation. 2. Evidence written: unsword, uncounter interrogated: this a voucher. 2 Anglice, Judicatory imperfect: Judge: Advocate in accounts for pursuer: in claims, for Defendant 3. COde 3. 1. A. has intrusted to B. money &c. in large masses, to be disposed of in small. B. accounts by shoing the disposal, Judicatory here an audit. 2 A. has in hand money &c in a large mass, to be disposed of in small claimants, they showing their grounds - Judicatory here a Court of Claims. 3. A & B. have each disposed of money &c for the benefit each of the other, in sums large or small: this to be shewn by each. Judicatories for these, the oordinary ones. 4. Government giving out and holding money & in the largest masses and in such Audit Courts & Courts of Claims as have been established, Government has been a party, appointing also the Judge or Judges.
---page break---

Ch.XII. Judiciary Collectively. S.2436 Judicatories &c Account and Claim For a perfectly composed Judicatory, need greater here than in ordinary cases. 1. Interests at stake greater. 2. So, exposure to fraud and oppression. 6. Cause of the omission. The Judge, being its instrument, Government needs no Advocate. 7. Secure the locators regard themselves of the fidelity of their instrument: viz to their particular interests. 2. To do.: of Government in so far as it agrees with their's. 8. Cause why Governmt. is left without an advocate. He, having to give reasons openly, could give none but such as pleaded for the public, and could not for any sinister interest or wish of the locatory - the Advocate being omitted, any ruler can whisper wishes to any Judge. 9. Hence, people's interest requires constant ministry of a Government Advocate. Ruler's sinister interest, the constant absence.
---page break---

Ch. XII. Judicary Collectively. S.25.36 Judicatories &c Account and Claim 10. 11. So an Eleemosynary Advocate. 2. For check on Judge as in all cases. 2. Because, in both cases, there may be individuals unable to defray the expence of the means of justice: in particular, means










Identifier: | JB/042/134/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1825-12-16

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-13

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

134

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham; john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

13057

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in