JB/078/028/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/078/028/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/078/028/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
&sect;2 Separation useful</note><lb/>
&sect;2 Separation useful</note><lb/>


<p>Of the separation thus made, <gap/>, with a view<lb/>
<p>Of the separation thus made, <unclear>preeminent</unclear>, with a view<lb/>
to practice, is in my view of the matter at least, the importance.<lb/>
to practice, is, in my view of the matter at least, the importance.<lb/>
Probability of adoption and dispatch in execution <del><gap/></del><lb/>
Probability of adoption and dispatch in execution <del><gap/></del><lb/>
join in the requisition that <gap/> of so vast a while the number<lb/>
join in the requisition that <del><gap/></del> of so vast a while the number<lb/>
of separate party be maximized. <gap/> <hi rend="underline">Probability of adoption</hi>: beca<del>use</del><lb/>
of separate party be maximized. 4 <hi rend="underline">Probability of adoption</hi>: beca<del>use</del><lb/>
<del>of the separation be aptly oppositely affected, the greater</del><lb/>
<del>if the separation be aptly oppositely affected, the greater</del><lb/>
<del>the number of the p<gap/> <add>consp<gap/> arrangements</add> the greater the number of the different</del><lb/>
<del>the number of the parts <add>component arrangements</add> the greater the number of the different</del><lb/>
<del>sets if opponents which the influential section of the commonly</del><lb/>
<del>sets if opponents which the influential section of the community</del><lb/>
is capable of furnishing to the whole together <add><del>bringing into the field</del> against<add><del>setting an array</del></add></add>, <del>and the greater</del><lb/>
is capable of <del>furnishing to the whole together</del> <add><del>bringing into the field</del> against<add><del>setting an array</del></add></add>, <del>together, and the greater</del><lb/>
<del>the number of the</del></p>
<del>the number of the</del></p>
<p><del>cause of the separation be not appositely effected, so many parts</del><lb/>
<del>as there are distinguishable adverse <gap/>, then</del> oppone</p>
<p>cause if the whole plan contains two <del>or three</del> parts,  
<p>cause if the whole plan contains two <del>or three</del> parts,  
<del>each</del><add>both</add><lb/>
<del>each</del><add>both</add><lb/>
Line 23: Line 26:
<del>a</del><add>two</add> distinct particular and <add>thence</add> sinister interests <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/>
<del>a</del><add>two</add> distinct particular and <add>thence</add> sinister interests <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/>
<add>one of them not of itself but with the addition of the other</add> <del>of itself not strong enough to <gap/> it out but both by other</del><lb/>
<add>one of them not of itself but with the addition of the other</add> <del>of itself not strong enough to <gap/> it out but both by other</del><lb/>
strong enough to throw it out, <del>their part may</del> <add>one of them may, notwithstanding</add> be carried into<lb/>
strong enough to throw it out, <del>their part may</del> <add>one of them may, notwithstanding the opposition</add> be carried into<lb/>
effect: wherein if the separation had not been made, both<lb/>
effect: wherein if the separation had not been made, both<lb/>
<add>sinister</add> interests would have stood opposed to it, and <del>it</del> <add>there we</add> would<lb/>
<add>sinister</add> interests would have stood opposed to it, and <del>it</del> <add>there we</add> would<lb/>
Line 33: Line 36:
<p>For want of such separation, many are the <add>salutary </add> <del>universally beneficial</del><lb/>
<p>For want of such separation, many are the <add>salutary </add> <del>universally beneficial</del><lb/>
<add><del>proposed</del></add> arrangements, <add>which if separately proposed would <del>not have been objected to</del><add>have found no opponent</add></add><add> but which by being conjointly proposed, have been lost</add> <del>that have been <gap/></del></p>
<add><del>proposed</del></add> arrangements, <add>which if separately proposed would <del>not have been objected to</del><add>have found no opponent</add></add><add> but which by being conjointly proposed, have been lost</add> <del>that have been <gap/></del></p>
<p>2. Then as to <hi rend="underline">dispatch</hi>: <add>of appositely made</add> the further the separation <del>if ap<gap/></del><lb/>
<p>2. Then as to <hi rend="underline">dispatch</hi>: <add>of appositely made</add> the further the separation <del>if appositely</del><lb/>
<del>made</del> is carried, the greater the number of <add>appropriately apt</add> hands or sets of hands<lb/>
<del>made</del> is carried, the greater the number of <add>appropriately apt</add> hands or sets of hands<lb/>
among which it <del>in the <gap/></del> may be distributed.</p>
among which it <del>in the <gap/></del> may be distributed.</p>


Then again as to appropriate aptitude: the further the separation<lb/>
Then again as to appropriate aptitude: the further the separation<lb/>
is carried, the greater the chance of finding a hand or set of hands, <add>in <add><del>each or <gap/></del></add></add> <note>ain a superior degree apt.<lb/>
is carried, the greater the chance of finding a hand or set of hands, <add>in <del>each or <gap/></del></add> <note>in a superior degree apt.<lb/>
<del>For <add>each</add> one through th</del>eir <lb/>
<del>For <add>each</add> one through th</del>eir <lb/>
each of them for one <add>part</add> though<lb/>
each of them for one <add>part</add> though<lb/>
they would not respectively<lb/>
they would not respectively<lb/>
<gap/> been equally so for  <del><gap/></del> any other</note><lb/>
pair been equally so for  <del><gap/></del> any other</note><lb/>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 08:45, 25 May 2021

Click Here To Edit

1826. Novr. 16

Review of Humphreys.

ult.
Ch II. H's eight Projects
§2 Separation useful

Of the separation thus made, preeminent, with a view
to practice, is, in my view of the matter at least, the importance.
Probability of adoption and dispatch in execution
join in the requisition that of so vast a while the number
of separate party be maximized. 4 Probability of adoption: because
if the separation be aptly oppositely affected, the greater
the number of the parts component arrangements the greater the number of the different
sets if opponents which the influential section of the community
is capable of furnishing to the whole together bringing into the field against<add>setting an array</add>, together, and the greater
the number of the

cause of the separation be not appositely effected, so many parts
as there are distinguishable adverse , then oppone

cause if the whole plan contains two or three parts, eachboth
of them beneficial to the universal interest, but opposed byrespectively
atwo distinct particular and thence sinister interests
one of them not of itself but with the addition of the other of itself not strong enough to it out but both by other
strong enough to throw it out, their part may one of them may, notwithstanding the opposition be carried into
effect: wherein if the separation had not been made, both
sinister interests would have stood opposed to it, and it there we would
have been an end to it, had no chance. Thus stands the matter, in the case
of two and no more mutually unconnected sinister interests: andbut the
greater the number of them, the smaller greater the number of the individuals less the population of each
united by each, united in opposition by eachand the greater accordingly the number of universally beneficial arrangements
the possessing a chance of being carried into effect.

For want of such separation, many are the salutary universally beneficial
proposed arrangements, which if separately proposed would not have been objected to<add>have found no opponent</add> but which by being conjointly proposed, have been lost that have been

2. Then as to dispatch: of appositely made the further the separation if appositely
made is carried, the greater the number of appropriately apt hands or sets of hands
among which it in the may be distributed.

Then again as to appropriate aptitude: the further the separation
is carried, the greater the chance of finding a hand or set of hands, in each or in a superior degree apt.
For each one through their
each of them for one part though
they would not respectively
pair been equally so for any other



Identifier: | JB/078/028/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.

Date_1

1826-11-16

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

078

Main Headings

Review of Humphreys

Folio number

028

Info in main headings field

Review of Humphreys

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

E2

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25119

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in