JB/143/097/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/143/097/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 30: Line 30:
be just as easy to punish in any way as to <gap/>rian the thing <del><gap/></del><add>that</add> made<lb/>
be just as easy to punish in any way as to <gap/>rian the thing <del><gap/></del><add>that</add> made<lb/>
them. The bet would be no small one <add><del><gap/></del></add>, IN it would be contained all those<lb/>
them. The bet would be no small one <add><del><gap/></del></add>, IN it would be contained all those<lb/>
who as no otherwise punishable than by impeachment: both Houses occupied
who as no otherwise punishable than by impeachment: both Houses occupied <note><add>[+]</add> doubted not it indeed,<lb/>Over and over again he has<lb/>
declared it from the Bench.<lb/>
Has the time then ceased to
be levied? not it indeed.<lb/>
The Chancellor having<lb/>
sanctioned it, the Court<lb/>
of <gap/> obeying has confirmed<lb/>
it.  <gap/> day making<lb/>
as if he had repeated then<lb/>
all, the Chancellor of the Exchequer<lb/>
<del>For a state</del> repeated some of<lb/>
the Law Taxes did he include<lb/>
<add>was</add> this money then? Not he<add>it</add> indeed.<lb/>
Its <gap/> not. Parliament can<lb/>
repeal an act of Parliament:<lb/>
it can not repeat and act<lb/>
of Lord Eldon. <add>His Majesty</add> <del>The King</del><lb/>
can not do without him: a Chancellor who though he doubts of every thing sticks at nothing as not to be parted. <gap/> give is an honour as honour not in<lb/>
court<gap/> <gap/><lb/>
He has <add>always had</add> one Judge over him.<lb/>
but that Judge has always<lb/>
been himself.  If his conduct<lb/>
is inquired into: it is by him<lb/>
that the inquiries are named.<lb/>
As to the two joint legislation<lb/>
in question, in Stat<gap/> is making<gap/><lb/>
for one of them: the other as<lb/>
still enjoying a pension of<lb/>
retreat. [+]</note><lb/>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 08:48, 3 June 2021

Click Here To Edit

1824 Oct 20

Constitutional Code Rationale of Reward

Pensions of Retreat

(5)

If any body were punished for they
use would it be? Lord Eldon for doing it?
No: not I for taking it. What for
selling what is true? Oh yes: still may surely then if it were false. For if matchless single
of brother is the pillar

Reason 2. Alledged Saving to the public is expected of sub the saving
Economy? if the such what charactered by
the it Saving at the spiggot, and betting
out at the laugh . Whatever saving <add>For the only possible saving somebodyagain</add> on the making of his
case underneath of, on this ground see the just mentioned remedy. would from the system
Reason 3. The more you give the more you increase his responsibility<add>By what you th whatever you then</add> toward about for the f of efficient situation
and expence in shape being think
Observation, you add to it in one sum, but you <add></add>take it away in another minimized frugality maximized

His supposing in the event of his being punished is and, but the probability
of his being punished is diminished. Increase I will to a certain degree almost by
Reason 3. By addition made to the value of
capacity of being suffering punishment in this lightest of all shapes, you have
the and given to the responsibility
of the functionary. Functionaries might be there are whom for abuse of thispoint it would
be just as easy to punish in any way as to rian the thing that made
them. The bet would be no small one , IN it would be contained all those
who as no otherwise punishable than by impeachment: both Houses occupied [+] doubted not it indeed,
Over and over again he has
declared it from the Bench.
Has the time then ceased to be levied? not it indeed.
The Chancellor having
sanctioned it, the Court
of obeying has confirmed
it. day making
as if he had repeated then
all, the Chancellor of the Exchequer
For a state repeated some of
the Law Taxes did he include
was this money then? Not heit indeed.
Its not. Parliament can
repeal an act of Parliament:
it can not repeat and act
of Lord Eldon. His Majesty The King
can not do without him: a Chancellor who though he doubts of every thing sticks at nothing as not to be parted. give is an honour as honour not in
court
He has always had one Judge over him.
but that Judge has always
been himself. If his conduct
is inquired into: it is by him
that the inquiries are named.
As to the two joint legislation
in question, in Stat is making
for one of them: the other as
still enjoying a pension of
retreat. [+]



Identifier: | JB/143/097/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 143.

Date_1

1824-10-20

Marginal Summary Numbering

or 5 - or 6

Box

143

Main Headings

rationale of reward

Folio number

097

Info in main headings field

rationale of reward

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5 / d5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

48730

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in