JB/052/211/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:56, 18 June 2021

1826 Sept. 13
Procedure Code

Ch. 1. All-embracing Arrangements
(3 §.4. Instruments

5
1 Correspondent to
application is applicant
the operator

1. Correspondent to application the the operator is applicant
the operator, the real entity

6
2 Correspondent to
Probation is probator
or say evidence holder

2 Correspondent to probation — the operation — the factitious —
is probator the really existing entity. Probator accordingly is the term presented
by analogy. Unfortunately the idea it presents f is too unapt
it is that of the success of the operation termed probation: whereas
little less frequently is the one followed by non-success than by
success. To keep clear of misrepresentation to the office here brought
to view another term by which nothing is decided as to success the topic of success is as it so
frequently needs to be, left untouched upon must be found. Say then Instead of probator say their Evidence-holder
appellation though unfortunately a two-worded one
for a single worded this could not be found

☞ For the divisions see Probation

Identifier: \| JB/052/211/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.
Date_1	1826-09-13	Marginal Summary Numbering	5-6
Box	052	Main Headings	procedure code
Folio number	211	Info in main headings field	procedure code
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e3
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1824
Marginals	george bentham	Paper Producer	jonathan blenman
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1824
Notes public		ID Number	16884
Box Contents

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<head>1826 <sic>Sept.</sic>  13<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- page number in pencil --> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> 1. All-embracing Arrangements</note><lb/>(3 <note>&sect;.4. Instruments</note></p> <p><note>5<lb/>1 Correspondent to<lb/>application is applicant<lb/>the operator</note></p> <p>1. Correspondent to application the <gap/> <add>the operator</add> <del><gap/></del> is applicant<lb/>the operator, the real entity</p> <p><note>6<lb/>2 Correspondent to<lb/>Probation is <sic>probator</sic><lb/>or say evidence holder</note></p> <p>2 Correspondent to probation &#x2014; the operation &#x2014; the factitious &#x2014;<lb/>is <hi rend="underline"><sic>probator</sic></hi> the really <add>existing </add> entity.  <hi rend="underline"><sic>Probator</sic></hi> <add>accordingly</add> is the term presented<lb/>by analogy.  Unfortunately the idea it presents <del>f</del> is too unapt<lb/>it is that of the success of the operation termed probation:  whereas<lb/>little less frequently is the one followed by non-success than by<lb/>success.  To keep clear of misrepresentation to the office here brought<lb/>to view another term by which nothing is decided as to success <add>the topic of success is as it so</add><lb/><add>frequently needs to be, left untouched upon</add> must be found.  <del>Say then</del>  Instead of <hi rend="underline"><sic>probator</sic></hi> say their <hi rend="underline">Evidence-holder</hi><lb/><del><gap/></del> appellation though unfortunately as <gap/> worded as<lb/><unclear>fine</unclear> as <gap/> worded this could not be found</p> <p>&#9758;  For the divisions see Probation</p>
+<head>1826 <sic>Sept.</sic>  13<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- page number in pencil --> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> 1. All-embracing Arrangements</note><lb/>(3 <note>&sect;.4. Instruments</note></p> <p><note>5<lb/>1 Correspondent to<lb/>application is applicant<lb/>the operator</note></p> <p>1. Correspondent to application the <gap/> <add>the operator</add> <del><gap/></del> is applicant<lb/>the operator, the real entity</p> <p><note>6<lb/>2 Correspondent to<lb/>Probation is <sic>probator</sic><lb/>or say evidence holder</note></p> <p>2 Correspondent to probation &#x2014; the operation &#x2014; the factitious &#x2014;<lb/>is <hi rend="underline"><sic>probator</sic></hi> the really <add>existing </add> entity.  <hi rend="underline"><sic>Probator</sic></hi> <add>accordingly</add> is the term presented<lb/>by analogy.  Unfortunately the idea it presents <del>f</del> is too unapt<lb/>it is that of the success of the operation termed probation:  whereas<lb/>little less frequently is the one followed by non-success than by<lb/>success.  To keep clear of misrepresentation to the office here brought<lb/>to view another term by which nothing is decided as to success <add>the topic of success is as it so</add><lb/><add>frequently needs to be, left untouched upon</add> must be found.  <del>Say then</del>  Instead of <hi rend="underline"><sic>probator</sic></hi> say their <hi rend="underline">Evidence-holder</hi><lb/><del><gap/></del> appellation though unfortunately a two-worded one<lb/>for a single worded this could not be found</p> <p>&#9758;  For the divisions see Probation</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Views

JB/052/211/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:56, 18 June 2021

Navigation

Search