JB/008/070/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/008/070/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/008/070/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/008/070/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/008/070/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p><head>1821 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 31<lb/>
Rid Yourselves &amp;c</head></p>
<p><head>&sect;. 1. Preliminary distinctions</head></p>
<p>31 or 1.  <note>See 22</note><lb/>
Application of these<lb/>
distinctions.<lb/>
1: Vol.<lb/>
1.  Distinction between<lb/>
Spain and Ultramaria's<lb/>
interest.<lb/>
Sole present, direct, and<lb/>
ultimate object of my<lb/>
regard, Spain's interest.<lb/>
Reason – not Ultramarian<lb/>
interests are less<lb/>
regarded by me, but<lb/>
1.  Spanish interest in<lb/>
the business is most<lb/>
liable to be misconceived.<lb/>
2.  Spanish interest can<lb/>
not be brought to view<lb/>
without Ultramarian.</p>
<p>The greater the damage<lb/>
to Ultramarians by<lb/>
the dominion, the greater<lb/>
their repugnance:<lb/>
the greater the repugnance,<lb/>
the greater the<lb/>
difficulty of surmounting<lb/>
it, and the danger<lb/>
of the endeavour.</p>
<p><note>From 25</note>  32 or 2.<lb/>
2<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi> abd 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> &amp; 4 Vol<lb/>
2.  Distinction between<lb/>
subject many, and<lb/>
ruling few's interest<lb/>
in both places.</p>
<p>Everywhere, a ruler<lb/>
has <del>his</del> <add>two</add> interests –<lb/>
his share in the universal,<lb/>
and his own<lb/>
personal interest, including<lb/>
what shares<lb/>
he has in other particular interests.</p>
<p>On every occasion on<lb/>
which, in his eyes, his<lb/>
individual interest is<lb/>
greater in value than<lb/>
all interests, universal &amp;<lb/>
particular, that stand<lb/>
opposed to it, they will<lb/>
be sacrificed to it.</p>
<p>This is not for accusation<lb/>
but instruction:  this<lb/>
being the universal and<lb/>
unchangeable character of man's nature.</p>
<pb/>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head>&sect;. 1. Preliminary distinctions</head></p>
 
<p>33 or 3.<lb/>
Application. continued.<lb/>
1.  To every Spaniard's share<lb/>
in the universal interest<lb/>
of Spain, most highly pernicious<lb/>
is the dominion.<lb/>
But, in the case of some,<lb/>
greater will be the benefit<lb/>
to their personal interests,<lb/>
than the burthen to their<lb/>
share in the universal interest.<lb/>
In this case, are the ruling<lb/>
few in Spain taken<lb/>
in the aggregate.</p>
<p>34 or 4.<lb/>
Stated here and then<lb/>
proved –<lb/>
1.  The points in which<lb/>
subject many would be<lb/>
losers and sufferers.<lb/>
2.  Those in which ruling<lb/>
few would be gainers.</p>
<p>35 or 5.<lb/>
Points of view in which<lb/>
subject many would be<lb/>
sufferers.<lb/>
1.  Financial.<lb/>
2.  Constitutional.</p>
<p>36 or 6.<lb/>
1.  Financial.  Sole gain,<lb/>
in this point of view, saving<lb/>
in taxes.  But, instead<lb/>
of saving, the result would<lb/>
be loss, beyond measure or<lb/>
calculation:  as much as<lb/>
could by possibility be wrung<lb/>
from you:  which your rulers<lb/>
for whom and by whom<lb/>
it would be extorted, would<lb/>
never have the entire benefit<lb/>
of for a year together.</p>
<p>37 or 7.<lb/>
If under Constitutional Code<lb/>
were produced the appearance<lb/>
of a saving in taxes to Spain,<lb/>
the appearance would be either<lb/>
delusive <hi rend="underline"><foreign>in toto</foreign></hi>, or effected by<lb/>
taxes on Ultramaria, and still,<lb/>
as to any net saving to Spain,<lb/>
delusive:  if, to Ultramaria, it<lb/>
were not a direct tax, it would<lb/>
be something still more<lb/>
burthensome.</p>
<pb/>


<p><head>&sect;. 1. Preliminary distinctions</head></p>
<p>Subjects of Distinction<lb/>
1.  Interests<lb/>
2.  Expence <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
3.  Codifiers situation and object.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 01:40, 9 July 2021

Click Here To Edit

1821 Jany 31
Rid Yourselves &c

§. 1. Preliminary distinctions

31 or 1. See 22
Application of these
distinctions.
1: Vol.
1. Distinction between
Spain and Ultramaria's
interest.
Sole present, direct, and
ultimate object of my
regard, Spain's interest.
Reason – not Ultramarian
interests are less
regarded by me, but
1. Spanish interest in
the business is most
liable to be misconceived.
2. Spanish interest can
not be brought to view
without Ultramarian.

The greater the damage
to Ultramarians by
the dominion, the greater
their repugnance:
the greater the repugnance,
the greater the
difficulty of surmounting
it, and the danger
of the endeavour.

From 25 32 or 2.
2d. abd 3d & 4 Vol
2. Distinction between
subject many, and
ruling few's interest
in both places.

Everywhere, a ruler
has his two interests –
his share in the universal,
and his own
personal interest, including
what shares
he has in other particular interests.

On every occasion on
which, in his eyes, his
individual interest is
greater in value than
all interests, universal &
particular, that stand
opposed to it, they will
be sacrificed to it.

This is not for accusation
but instruction: this
being the universal and
unchangeable character of man's nature.


---page break---

§. 1. Preliminary distinctions

33 or 3.
Application. continued.
1. To every Spaniard's share
in the universal interest
of Spain, most highly pernicious
is the dominion.
But, in the case of some,
greater will be the benefit
to their personal interests,
than the burthen to their
share in the universal interest.
In this case, are the ruling
few in Spain taken
in the aggregate.

34 or 4.
Stated here and then
proved –
1. The points in which
subject many would be
losers and sufferers.
2. Those in which ruling
few would be gainers.

35 or 5.
Points of view in which
subject many would be
sufferers.
1. Financial.
2. Constitutional.

36 or 6.
1. Financial. Sole gain,
in this point of view, saving
in taxes. But, instead
of saving, the result would
be loss, beyond measure or
calculation: as much as
could by possibility be wrung
from you: which your rulers
for whom and by whom
it would be extorted, would
never have the entire benefit
of for a year together.

37 or 7.
If under Constitutional Code
were produced the appearance
of a saving in taxes to Spain,
the appearance would be either
delusive in toto, or effected by
taxes on Ultramaria, and still,
as to any net saving to Spain,
delusive: if, to Ultramaria, it
were not a direct tax, it would
be something still more
burthensome.


---page break---

§. 1. Preliminary distinctions

Subjects of Distinction
1. Interests
2. Expence
3. Codifiers situation and object.



Identifier: | JB/008/070/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 8.

Date_1

1821-01-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

31 or 1 - 37 or 7

Box

008

Main Headings

rid yourselves of ultramaria

Folio number

070

Info in main headings field

rid yourselves &c

Image

001

Titles

preliminary distinctions

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d3 / e2

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

3174

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in