JB/042/162/001

Click Here To Edit

1823. August 9

Constitutional Code. III. Rationale
Ch. 13 Judge
Introductory Observation

5
Acceptance of office
on these terms a greater
proof of appropriate
aptitude thus a boasting
& pretended indignant
rejection

Of utter inaptitude of all appropriate aptitude for with relation to the baseness
of these several offices which will be the most straight portative
evidence? acceptance of the office in those liters? or strutting
dem, by locks and boading plesures declining declaratory
of indignation pretended to be felt at the thoughts of a mans
being capable of giving acceptance to it an .

6
Non acceptance a
proof of inaptitude

Of utter inaptitude with relation to the function of it
what conclusive evidence can be afforded than the determination
to accept of it upon these terms.

7
In England enormity
of lawyers enrolement
held upon a reason for
corresponding enormity
in Judges emolument

In England the enormity of the annul masses of enrolment
received by binding Advocates from the practice of this immoral
profession is held up to with triumph as an adequate and
able reason for correspondent enormity in the emoluments
attached to the Office of Judge of highest superior and next to highest
grade. For this access enormity though in adequate ra the is still
a pl are: the man prepamphlets of the law, and the presumption
that by the Advocate who has had most practise, the greatest largest
quantum if not only of appropriate knowledge but of appropriate
judgement will be possessed.

8
In proposed Code, the
grand demand for
appropriate knowledge
on the part of Judges
done away by the
substitution of real to
fictitious law

In the of Codes of which the present an form the
highest , the grand demand for appropriate knowledge
vast space open to the reception of different degrees of appropriate
knowledge will be done away by the substitution of proposed rule
how to the at print every where accepted fictitious and
p to real law.

In that very proposed mode the Garden had as find by the
exclusion of all herding Advocates from the capacity of wrong in the capacity
of Judges either principal in depute.

Identifier: | JB/042/162/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
Date_1	1823-08-09	Marginal Summary Numbering	5-8
Box	042	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	162	Info in main headings field	constitutional code
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d2 / e2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1822
Marginals		Paper Producer	admiral pavel chichagov
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1822
Notes public		ID Number	13085
Box Contents