★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>23 July 1805<lb/><head>Evidence</head><lb/>2. Second note of <unclear>permission.</unclear> In this second note the<lb/> language provided by the man of law is the language that is used <lb/> out of his own life. He says one thing, he means a different <lb/> thing! [this <!-- bracket in pencil begins -->meaning <del> whatever</del> answered to these words by himself he<lb/> keeps to himself. he keep it in himself, lest the need for understanding<lb/> what] <!-- bracket in pencil ends --> this <unclear>Jester</unclear> is, that this juror on <unclear>proper</unclear> of this ordinance<lb/> or non-completeness <add>with rules</add>. Shall, be<add>to the prosper of this July and for considerences</add> Jumbled or otherwise view. To<lb/> give the appearance of a warrant for the <unclear>???</unclear> the first thing<lb/> withstanding<add>willful</add> is to guarantee the offer. For this perform in <del><unclear>uniform</unclear></del><lb/> command, this juror is <sic>do</sic><add>perform</add> a certain act:<del>the juror does</del> the act to<lb/><add>commanded to</add><del>performed</del> by the juror is performed and<add>wherefor</add> the juror is <unclear></unclear>.<lb/> <unclear>Permitted?</unclear> and for what?—for act <unclear>hardly</unclear> performed another out<lb/> that a law was commanded. This was for this law- performance of<lb/> which the juror is<add>thus</add> punished is in fact which was <unclear>in hand criminal</unclear><lb/> in used to law: in and which is <unclear>yours</unclear> the law of the Jury. Should<lb/> not be <unclear>commiserated</unclear> to him.<del>Thus</del><add>This</add> meaning <del><gap/></del> of the Judge<lb/> of the Judge was to be behaved, was that the use for the law performance<lb/> of which the juror is punished by laws should how law performed<lb/> by law, But<add>had</add> this meaning been commanded to the juror<lb/> the use in question might have been performed by him; whereby the<lb/> rules for punishing how<add> as </add>for the law performance of it would have<lb/> been <sic>disappropriate</sic>. This provided invariably- it was uniform injury<lb/> should be helped in same from the juror; and to help this just, an<lb/> <gap/> that where willing could be won of helped was unphelped; would <lb/> was unjudged, where according to the meaning around to them by and<lb/> meaningful [ men of law to uphold] signified quiet adherence in if act,<lb/> men ought such as would law to many Jury have <gap/> idea of the<lb/> law in question, for the laws performance<add>and for any law Judgement</add> of which this juror is Justified<lb/> or otherwise would be. | <p>23 July 1805<lb/><head>Evidence</head><lb/>2. Second note of <unclear>permission.</unclear> In this second note the<lb/> language provided by the man of law is the language that is used <lb/> out of his own life. He says one thing, he means a different <lb/> thing! [this <!-- bracket in pencil begins -->meaning <del> whatever</del> answered to these words by himself he<lb/> keeps to himself. he keep it in himself, lest the need for understanding<lb/> what] <!-- bracket in pencil ends --> this <unclear>Jester</unclear> is, that this juror, on <unclear>proper</unclear> of this ordinance<lb/> or non-completeness <add>with rules</add>. Shall, be<add>to the prosper of this July and for considerences</add> Jumbled or otherwise view. To<lb/> give the appearance of a warrant for the <unclear>???</unclear> the first thing<lb/> withstanding<add>willful</add> is to guarantee the offer. For this perform in <del><unclear>uniform</unclear></del><lb/> command, this juror is <sic>do</sic><add>perform</add> a certain act:<del>the juror does</del> the act to<lb/><add>commanded to</add><del>performed</del> by the juror is performed and<add>wherefor</add> the juror is <unclear></unclear>.<lb/> <unclear>Permitted?</unclear> and for what?—for act <unclear>hardly</unclear> performed another out<lb/> that a law was commanded. This was for this law- performance of<lb/> which the juror is<add>thus</add> punished is in fact which was <unclear>in hand criminal</unclear><lb/> in used to law: in and which is <unclear>yours</unclear> the law of the Jury. Should<lb/> not be <unclear>commiserated</unclear> to him.<del>Thus</del><add>This</add> meaning <del><gap/></del> of the Judge<lb/> of the Judge was to be behaved, was that the use for the law performance<lb/> of which the juror is punished by laws should how law performed<lb/> by law, But<add>had</add> this meaning been commanded to the juror<lb/> the use in question might have been performed by him; whereby the<lb/> rules for punishing how<add> as </add>for the law performance of it would have<lb/> been <sic>disappropriate</sic>. This provided invariably- it was uniform injury<lb/> should be helped in same from the juror; and to help this just, an<lb/> <gap/> that where willing could be won of helped was unphelped; would <lb/> was unjudged, where according to the meaning around to them by and<lb/> meaningful [ men of law to uphold] signified quiet adherence in if act,<lb/> men ought such as would law to many Jury have <gap/> idea of the<lb/> law in question, for the laws performance<add>and for any law Judgement</add> of which this juror is Justified<lb/> or otherwise would be. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
23 July 1805
Evidence
2. Second note of permission. In this second note the
language provided by the man of law is the language that is used
out of his own life. He says one thing, he means a different
thing! [this meaning whatever answered to these words by himself he
keeps to himself. he keep it in himself, lest the need for understanding
what] this Jester is, that this juror, on proper of this ordinance
or non-completeness with rules. Shall, beto the prosper of this July and for considerences Jumbled or otherwise view. To
give the appearance of a warrant for the ??? the first thing
withstandingwillful is to guarantee the offer. For this perform in uniform
command, this juror is doperform a certain act:the juror does the act to
commanded toperformed by the juror is performed andwherefor the juror is .
Permitted? and for what?—for act hardly performed another out
that a law was commanded. This was for this law- performance of
which the juror isthus punished is in fact which was in hand criminal
in used to law: in and which is yours the law of the Jury. Should
not be commiserated to him.ThusThis meaning of the Judge
of the Judge was to be behaved, was that the use for the law performance
of which the juror is punished by laws should how law performed
by law, Buthad this meaning been commanded to the juror
the use in question might have been performed by him; whereby the
rules for punishing how as for the law performance of it would have
been disappropriate. This provided invariably- it was uniform injury
should be helped in same from the juror; and to help this just, an
that where willing could be won of helped was unphelped; would
was unjudged, where according to the meaning around to them by and
meaningful [ men of law to uphold] signified quiet adherence in if act,
men ought such as would law to many Jury have idea of the
law in question, for the laws performanceand for any law Judgement of which this juror is Justified
or otherwise would be.
|
Identifier: | JB/047/157/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1805-07-23 |
13 |
||
|
047 |
evidence |
||
|
157 |
evidence |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e5 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
15025 |
|||
