JB/141/074/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/141/074/003: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/141/074/003": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/074/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/074/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><unclear>19</unclear></p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head>Imprisonment exa'd</head></p>
 
<p>But to suppose that men consist only of two classes –<lb/>
 
the good &amp; the bad – is a vulgar prejudice. <del>but</del><lb/>
 
The crime which subjects a man to the lash of the<lb/>
law may leave him possessed of a thousand good<lb/>
qualities and more especially of sympathy for<lb/>
the misfortunes of others.  <del>This is proved by</del>  Experience<lb/>
will convince us of this:  even vice itself may<lb/>
be calumniated.</p>
<p>The considerations derived from the <hi rend="underline">moral sanction</hi><lb/>
<del>is the ope</del> are founded on the opinion <del>that</del> with<lb/>
reference to any particular act may be supposed to<lb/>
be entertained by <del>the public at large</del> such persons<lb/>
with whom the person in question may happen to<lb/>
be in society.  So long as a man lives in the<lb/>
society of persons at large though his reputation were<lb/>
the object of general suspicion, he would still be<lb/>
under a certain degree of restraint in order to avoid<lb/>
the confirming those suspicions that are already<lb/>
so generally entertained.  In a person however no<lb/>
such <del>pul</del> public <del>ex</del> exists.  That which composes<lb/>
the ordinary population of a person is <del>activated</del> <add>governed</add><lb/>
by motives &amp; principles altogether adverse to<lb/>
those of the rest of mankind.  The habits and<lb/>
practises which were odious there, because they<lb/>
were mischievous there, not being mischievous<lb/>
are not odious here.  Plunder is not odious to men<lb/>
who have nothing to lose, &amp; who <del>consider</del> regard it<lb/>
as a means of subsistence.  To the virtue of probity<lb/>
it is <del>a</del> in vain for any of them to make pretensions;<lb/>
they agree therefore by a kind of tacit convention to<lb/>
<sic>depretiate</sic> its value.  The virtues of patience intrepidity<lb/>
activity ingenuity fidelity which are beneficial<lb/>
or mischievous according as they are made subservient<lb/>
to the promotion of vice or <add>of</add> virtue are <del>magnitude</del> <add>magnified</add> to<lb/>
the prejudice of <del>prob</del> the virtue of probity.  Thus<lb/>
a man is applauded for his patience exerted in lying<lb/>
<add>in</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 01:22, 25 November 2021

Click Here To Edit

19

Imprisonment exa'd

But to suppose that men consist only of two classes –
the good & the bad – is a vulgar prejudice. but
The crime which subjects a man to the lash of the
law may leave him possessed of a thousand good
qualities and more especially of sympathy for
the misfortunes of others. This is proved by Experience
will convince us of this: even vice itself may
be calumniated.

The considerations derived from the moral sanction
is the ope are founded on the opinion that with
reference to any particular act may be supposed to
be entertained by the public at large such persons
with whom the person in question may happen to
be in society. So long as a man lives in the
society of persons at large though his reputation were
the object of general suspicion, he would still be
under a certain degree of restraint in order to avoid
the confirming those suspicions that are already
so generally entertained. In a person however no
such pul public ex exists. That which composes
the ordinary population of a person is activated governed
by motives & principles altogether adverse to
those of the rest of mankind. The habits and
practises which were odious there, because they
were mischievous there, not being mischievous
are not odious here. Plunder is not odious to men
who have nothing to lose, & who consider regard it
as a means of subsistence. To the virtue of probity
it is a in vain for any of them to make pretensions;
they agree therefore by a kind of tacit convention to
depretiate its value. The virtues of patience intrepidity
activity ingenuity fidelity which are beneficial
or mischievous according as they are made subservient
to the promotion of vice or of virtue are magnitude magnified to
the prejudice of prob the virtue of probity. Thus
a man is applauded for his patience exerted in lying
in


Identifier: | JB/141/074/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

074

Info in main headings field

Image

003

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f20 / f20 / f21 / f19

Penner

richard smith

Watermarks

[[watermarks::dusautoy & rump 1809 [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

edward collins

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1809

Notes public

ID Number

48291

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in