JB/149/256/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/149/256/003: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/149/256/003": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/149/256/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/149/256/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>my life will be the first of my reign.  In that I am well<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
inclined to agree, for without reference to your departure,<lb/>
 
the approach of the practical <add>recognition and</add> adoption<lb/>
 
of the greatest happiness principle is already perceptible.<lb/>
 
I have seen myself and he stiled in<lb/>
print the <del>Lockes</del> Bacons and the Locke of<lb/>
Legislation.  You said you knew of no man who<lb/>
had done more for mankind?  <add>As far as I can now judge</add> No <del>one</del> philosopher<lb/>
<del>that I can at this recollect</del> has <del>deserved</del> <add>done</add> more of these than you have<lb/>
Bacon <del>was</del> has been more praised than read or<lb/>
understood and I think it would be difficult to<lb/>
prove that the influence of his writings on<lb/>
philosophy has been so great as is supposed.<lb/>
I think we cannot ascribe much effect to <del>it</del> <add>them</add> when<lb/>
we see <del>that</del> even in the present day how little<lb/>
inductions and the portions of philosophy which he<lb/>
established are seen in practice.  The merits of Locke<lb/>
were certainly of a very high order.  I have always<lb/>
thought that his great service has been in the<lb/>
over throw of the doctrine of innate ideas;  but his<lb/>
contributions to the improvement of moans and legislation<lb/>
I do not think <del>of</del> very considerable importance.<lb/>
Bentham's Locke pulled down much and built a<lb/>
little.  <unclear>6.</unclear> <del>It is not any</del> The service <add>effect of</add> that Newton<lb/>
performed, <del>will can</del> <add>could</add> only perhaps be estimated in<lb/>
considered in refference to the progress of the arts.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 05:43, 8 December 2021

Click Here To Edit

my life will be the first of my reign. In that I am well
inclined to agree, for without reference to your departure,
the approach of the practical recognition and adoption
of the greatest happiness principle is already perceptible.
I have seen myself and he stiled in
print the Lockes Bacons and the Locke of
Legislation. You said you knew of no man who
had done more for mankind? As far as I can now judge No one philosopher
that I can at this recollect has deserved done more of these than you have
Bacon was has been more praised than read or
understood and I think it would be difficult to
prove that the influence of his writings on
philosophy has been so great as is supposed.
I think we cannot ascribe much effect to it them when
we see that even in the present day how little
inductions and the portions of philosophy which he
established are seen in practice. The merits of Locke
were certainly of a very high order. I have always
thought that his great service has been in the
over throw of the doctrine of innate ideas; but his
contributions to the improvement of moans and legislation
I do not think of very considerable importance.
Bentham's Locke pulled down much and built a
little. 6. It is not any The service effect of that Newton
performed, will can could only perhaps be estimated in
considered in refference to the progress of the arts.


Identifier: | JB/149/256/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 149.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

149

Main Headings

Folio number

256

Info in main headings field

Image

003

Titles

Category

journal

Number of Pages

3

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

street & co 1830

Marginals

Paper Producer

antonio alcala galiano

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1830

Notes public

ID Number

50110

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in