★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
his guilt. What the<lb/>occasion seems to call<lb/> | his guilt. What the<lb/>occasion seems to call<lb/> | ||
for it -</note><lb/> | for it -</note><lb/> | ||
2. A sketch of the provision he would make for the <gap/><lb/> | <p>2. A sketch of the provision he would make for the prevention<lb/> | ||
of the sensation of <del>loss</del> loss and thence of the <sic>compleat</sic> of<lb/> | |||
injustice from retroactive affects designedly or undesignedly<lb/> | |||
given to his proposed new arrangements. On this ground he<lb/> | |||
will find the enemy lying in wait for him. His defences are <lb/> | |||
would I find be found not to be in this present state quite so <lb/> | |||
<sic>compleat</sic> as <del>they would <gap/></del> the purpose required they should be<lb/> | |||
Better they should be brought to his view by his own or a <gap/><lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del>, them held up to the view of the public by <gap/> h<gap/> hand<lb/> | |||
<add><gap/>fore them is</add> The disappointment-preventing principle <del>as <gap/> <gap/></del> - If an<lb/> | |||
oracle is wanted, does the nature of the case afford any so trustworthy<lb/> | |||
an aim? Will it not afford a list of the validity of all objectives<lb/> | |||
which it is in the power of lawyercraft to ruin?</p> | |||
<p><del>Self-regarding prudence joint with b<gap/> in recommending</del><lb/> | |||
<del>a close <gap/> to this subject, and</del> 1. deluded exposition of the <lb/> | |||
< | arrangements proposed for the exclusion of mischief from this source<lb/> | ||
Self-regarding prudence presents itself as joining with benevolence<lb/> | |||
in calling for a <del>close</del><add>carefree</add> attention to this subject. On this part of the<lb/> | |||
ground, I see the enemy lying in wait for him. His defences<lb/> | |||
I f<gap/>,an act as yet no <del><gap/></del> quite to good <del><gap/></del> a condition<lb/> | |||
as the occasion requires.</p>{{In_Progress}} | |||
1826. Decr 16
Review of Humphreys
Ch Agenda
§ Picture of function given
§ Retraction efforts obviate
Two other parting little tastes at parting<add>for</add>our Hercules Hercules. for the my learned Master
Another task or two A far more I will take the liberty of mentioning
still looking for performance the of my
1. With For the instruction of and takes their draughtsman, a paper
exhibiting the a picture of the the most commonly simplified diversification
which the state of a mans family connections a family ordinates of growth a view to the provision provision
desirable and state to be desired to be made for the in a last Will. To such provision as requirea
to be made by a deed, the sam this picture is already afforded by the
Family settlement deed. But in this case the provision goes not besides these disposal others
there much where considerable for which beyond a future contingent family. Remain to be provided for the for the objects of the provision
whatsoever members are
capable of being
within a compass of
any family already
all already such as
are already in existence |
be of use that the states which mans family
kindred and mans connection natural and acquired are distinguishable
of should on the occasion of will-making to present to
—
2. Provision against the
mischief liable to be th
by the oactive effects
of the proposed new system
mischief of the nature
of that by which withthe so
much name of an
exp facto in English
language, of him to which
is that of privileg
in Cionion and Rome-
-brid language so just
an object of reproach.
Here, if I mistake not
he will feel the convenience of the advantage
himself at his use of
baking the disappointment
preventing principle for
his guilt. What the
occasion seems to call
for it -
2. A sketch of the provision he would make for the prevention
of the sensation of loss loss and thence of the compleat of
injustice from retroactive affects designedly or undesignedly
given to his proposed new arrangements. On this ground he
will find the enemy lying in wait for him. His defences are
would I find be found not to be in this present state quite so
compleat as they would the purpose required they should be
Better they should be brought to his view by his own or a
, them held up to the view of the public by h hand
fore them is The disappointment-preventing principle as - If an
oracle is wanted, does the nature of the case afford any so trustworthy
an aim? Will it not afford a list of the validity of all objectives
which it is in the power of lawyercraft to ruin?
Self-regarding prudence joint with b in recommending
a close to this subject, and 1. deluded exposition of the
arrangements proposed for the exclusion of mischief from this source
Self-regarding prudence presents itself as joining with benevolence
in calling for a closecarefree attention to this subject. On this part of the
ground, I see the enemy lying in wait for him. His defences
I f,an act as yet no quite to good a condition
as the occasion requires.
