JB/121/351/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/351/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/121/351/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/351/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/351/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->6 Apr. 1802<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Dispensing power</head></p>
 
<p>in that conscience they believed, Parliament itself<lb/>
 
would have done, had it been in a condition capable<lb/>
 
of acting at the time.  For supposing them to<lb/>
have said Parliament would not have done as<lb/>
it did, because Parliament through meaning as well <add>as full of benevolence</add><lb/>
towards the public as we are, does not understand<lb/>
what is good for the public as well as<lb/>
we do – this allegation, how sincere soever it<lb/>
may be supposed, would not be understood as<lb/>
<del>making</del> rendering them innocent, or indeed as<lb/>
making any specific and practical defalcation from<lb/>
the enormity of the crime and the consequent demand<lb/>
for punishment.</p>
<p><del>They know that <add>by</add> the law of Parliament, as it</del></p>
<p>What they did know – what they were <hi rend="underline">conscious</hi> of<lb/>
was – that, <add>by</add> the law of Parliament, as it actually<lb/>
existed, the act they took upon themselves to exercise<lb/>
was not warranted:  But the consciousness was<lb/>
not a criminal consciousness.  Because the <add>true</add> measure<lb/>
of legality and illegality <del>is the plea</del> at each<lb/>
point of time is the pleasure of the supreme power<lb/>
of the state at that very point of time.  <del>Knowing</del> <add>Conscious</add><lb/>
<del>that</del> <add>beyond a doubt, that</add> by the pleasure according to the will of Parliament in<lb/>
the state at <add>in</add> which it existed at the time of the passing<lb/>
the Acts <add>Act law</add> in question, the act done <add>exercised</add> by them in the suspending<lb/>
of that law,<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> was contrary to what at the time of making the law was the wish of Parliament,</note> they took upon themselves nevertheless to <del>denounce</del> <add>notwithstanding to</add><lb/>
<del>that that act</del> <add>pronounce of such their act, that it</add> was conformable to what in<lb/>
<add>the</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 03:43, 7 March 2022

'Click Here To Edit

6 Apr. 1802
Dispensing power

in that conscience they believed, Parliament itself
would have done, had it been in a condition capable
of acting at the time. For supposing them to
have said Parliament would not have done as
it did, because Parliament through meaning as well as full of benevolence
towards the public as we are, does not understand
what is good for the public as well as
we do – this allegation, how sincere soever it
may be supposed, would not be understood as
making rendering them innocent, or indeed as
making any specific and practical defalcation from
the enormity of the crime and the consequent demand
for punishment.

They know that by the law of Parliament, as it

What they did know – what they were conscious of
was – that, by the law of Parliament, as it actually
existed, the act they took upon themselves to exercise
was not warranted: But the consciousness was
not a criminal consciousness. Because the true measure
of legality and illegality is the plea at each
point of time is the pleasure of the supreme power
of the state at that very point of time. Knowing Conscious
that beyond a doubt, that by the pleasure according to the will of Parliament in
the state at in which it existed at the time of the passing
the Acts Act law in question, the act done exercised by them in the suspending
of that law, was contrary to what at the time of making the law was the wish of Parliament, they took upon themselves nevertheless to denounce notwithstanding to
that that act pronounce of such their act, that it was conformable to what in
the


Identifier: | JB/121/351/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-04-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

351

Info in main headings field

Dispensing power

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D3

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in