JB/106/108/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/108/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/106/108/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/108/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/108/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->8 March 1807</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Those jurisprudential scientific words and phrases,<lb/>
 
are they then of no use? <add>is the employment made of them <del><gap/></del> is it to be <unclear>numbered</unclear>?</add> are they among the abuses and<lb/>
 
grievances with which the field <add>land</add> of law is at present loaded<lb/>
 
and defiled?  By no means.  There are many of them<lb/>
that are of indispensable use.  They <del>could</del> perform each<lb/>
of hem, as often as repeated <add>on each occasion on which it comes to be repeated</add>, the function of perhaps several<lb/>
<add>whole</add> lines of words:  viz: the collection of words necessary for translating<lb/>
<del>their</del> <add>the</add> import of them respectively into words in general<lb/>
use.</p>
<p>By these abridged modes <add>forms</add> of expression, discourses are<lb/>
held with <del><gap/></del> care, which <add>such as</add> otherwise if held at all<lb/>
could not be held without extreme difficulty.  Grammarians<lb/>
understand, all who have science to write <add>or speak</add> occasionally<lb/>
feel – the difficulty and embarassment that attends the<lb/>
use of composed <hi rend="underline">nominative</hi> <del>but</del> or <hi rend="underline">accusative</hi>, still more<lb/>
that of a composed <hi rend="underline"><unclear>quistive</unclear></hi> case:  a word composed of a<lb/>
whole law of words, <add>of</add> which to convey its <add>the</add> import clearly the<lb/>
last <del><gap/></del> ought to have the sign of the <unclear>quistive</unclear> case,<lb/>
– the 's – annext to it:  which sign a means of<lb/>
the awkwardness of the location is <add>now</add> commonly left out,<lb/>
the awkwardness in some measure masked, but at the expence<lb/>
of clearness.  In jurisprudence this difficulty would be continually<lb/>
recurring and with <add>indefinitely</add> increased force, even it not for the<lb/>
use of these necessary <del>abridged</del> abbreviations – this intellectual<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">short-hand</hi>.</p>
<p>The algebraist when he finds <del>his <gap/></del> himself oppressed<lb/>
by the endless <add>symbolical</add> line of <del>figures</del> <add>letters</add> by which his composite quantity stands<lb/>
expressed, substitutes a single letter to the whole series, and thus<lb/>
finds himself at his ease.  <del>How would be f</del> <add>What would be</add> his embarassment, if precluded from <add>the use of <del>of a</del></add> this necessary resource!</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 04:09, 16 March 2022

Click Here To Edit

8 March 1807

Those jurisprudential scientific words and phrases,
are they then of no use? is the employment made of them is it to be numbered? are they among the abuses and
grievances with which the field land of law is at present loaded
and defiled? By no means. There are many of them
that are of indispensable use. They could perform each
of hem, as often as repeated on each occasion on which it comes to be repeated, the function of perhaps several
whole lines of words: viz: the collection of words necessary for translating
their the import of them respectively into words in general
use.

By these abridged modes forms of expression, discourses are
held with care, which such as otherwise if held at all
could not be held without extreme difficulty. Grammarians
understand, all who have science to write or speak occasionally
feel – the difficulty and embarassment that attends the
use of composed nominative but or accusative, still more
that of a composed quistive case: a word composed of a
whole law of words, of which to convey its the import clearly the
last ought to have the sign of the quistive case,
– the 's – annext to it: which sign a means of
the awkwardness of the location is now commonly left out,
the awkwardness in some measure masked, but at the expence
of clearness. In jurisprudence this difficulty would be continually
recurring and with indefinitely increased force, even it not for the
use of these necessary abridged abbreviations – this intellectual
short-hand.

The algebraist when he finds his himself oppressed
by the endless symbolical line of figures letters by which his composite quantity stands
expressed, substitutes a single letter to the whole series, and thus
finds himself at his ease. How would be f What would be his embarassment, if precluded from the use of of a this necessary resource!


Identifier: | JB/106/108/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-03-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

10-12

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

108

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34696

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in