JB/550/213/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/550/213/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/550/213/002": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/550/213/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/550/213/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>10</p>
<p>walls have been found occasionally unavailing: upon this than the thinne<lb/> would <add>be</add> sufficiant: a circumstance which must oferate in a striking <gap/><lb/> towards a diminution of the expence.</p>
<p>walls have been found occasionally unavailing: upon this plan, the <unclear>thinne</unclear><lb/>
<p>
would <add>be</add> sufficient: a circumstance which must operate in a striking degree<lb/>
In this, as in every other application of the plan, you fin its coefficient,<lb/> not less compicious than its coercive, tendency: in as much than, if you would<lb/> be as<gap/> who had most cause to with for its adoption, you might find yourself<lb/> at some loss to determine, between the male factors themselves, and those<lb/> those for whom she they are <gap/> to <gap/><gap/>     
towards a diminution of the expence.</p>
<p>In this, as in every other application of the plan, you find its <unclear>ient</unclear><lb/>
not less conspicuous than its coercive, tendency: insomuch that, if you were<lb/>
be asked, who had most cause to wish for its adoption, you might find yourself<lb/>
at some loss to determine, between the malefactors themselves, and those<lb/>
<del>those</del> for whose sake they are consigned to punishment.   
</p>
</p>
 
<p>In this view, I am sure, you cannot overlook the effect which it <unclear>would</unclear><lb/>
<p>In this view, I am sure, you cannot overlook the effect which it could<lb/> have in <gap/><gap/> any that inesebaustible fund of disproportions<lb/> too often needless, and always in <gap/><gap/> severity, not to say extortion,<del><gap/></del> <lb/> the <hi rend="underline">use</hi> of <hi rend="underline">irons</hi>, confined in one these cells, every motion of his <gap/><lb/> and every muscle of his face, exforced to view, what <gap/> coul there be<lb/> for one becoming to this hardship even the <gap/> boisterion malefactor?. In ebulg<lb/> wih erfeet liberty wihin the space allotted to him, is what warns every could<lb/> he want his magc than by beating his head against the wall? and who by<lb/> himself would be a supperer by such folly? <del><gap/><gap/></del></p>
have in rendering unnecessary that inexhaustible fund of <unclear>disproportionable</unclear><lb/>
 
too often needless, and always unpopular severity, not to say extortion,<del><gap/></del><lb/>  
<head>Letter VIII.</head>
the <hi rend="underline">use</hi> of <hi rend="underline">irons</hi>.  Confined in one of these Cells, every motion of his limbs<lb/>
<p>In my last I endeavoured to state to you the advantages, which<lb/> a <gap/>, upon the plan of my Brother's preponed building, seemed<lb/> <gap/>, in its application to places of confinement, convidired merely<lb/> that view: Give me leave now to consider it as applicable to the joint<gap/><lb/> of punishment, information, <hi rend="underline">and peeuniary economy.</hi></p>  
and every muscle of his face, exposed to view, what pretence could there be<lb/>
<p>
for exposing to this hardship even the most boisterous malefactor?  In <gap/><lb/>
That in regard to person of the deveription of those to whom punishments<lb/> of the nature in question are destined, volitude is in its <gap/><lb/><gap/> to the purpose of information, seems to be as little disputed,<lb/> its lendeney to operate in addition to the mass of vuference. But thely<lb/> thin plan that purpose woul be effected, at last as completely as it could<lb/> on any other, you cannot but see at the first glance, or rather you must<lb/> have obscured already. In the condition of <hi rend="underline">our</hi> prisoner, (for so I call that for shortness value,) <add>you <gap/> see</add> the students paradox, <hi rend="underline">nungucm</hi> <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi><hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> <hi rend="underline">consolus,</hi><lb/> <gap/> in a nw way; to he Keeper a multitude through and a<lb/> crowd; to themselves they are volitary and sequentured individuals,</p>  
with perfect liberty wihin the space allotted to him, is what worn way could<lb/>
 
he vent his rage than by beating his head against the wall? and who by<lb/>
<p>What is more, you will see this purpose answered more completely<lb/> this plan than it could possibly be any other, What degree of volitude<lb/> was proposed to reduce them to in the once. intended Denitisitiary.how<lb/> you need not trouble yourself to conisder; but for one purpose in building<lb/> of every mode of construction that could them and there have been invited<lb/> it would have been necessary, according to the <gap/> regulations of that <gap/><lb/> that the laws of volitude should be dispenced with; I mean, so often as the<lb/> prisoners were to receive the benefits of attendance on decision service, But <add>me</add></p>  
himself would be a sufferer by such folly?<hi rend="superscript"></hi></p>
 
<p><note><hi rend="superscript"></hi> Noise, the only<lb/> offence, by which a<lb/>
<p><gap/> area, might be precluded <add>not entitled</add> by a rail from approaching nears<lb/> than to certain distance from the cells: and in some cases all conversations<lb/> between them and he prisoners might be interdieled altogether. The propriety<lb/> of such a regulation may be thought to stand upon a different fooling<lb/> according as the confinement was previous <del>t</del>or subsiquent to conviction<lb/> and according to the nature  of the offence, and the intended serving<lb/> of the punishment.</p>
man, thus encaged,<lb/>
 
could render himself<lb/>
<note>10
troublesome,<lb/>
noise, the only<lb/> offence, by which a<lb/> man, this encaged<lb/> could render himself<lb/> troubles once,<lb/> (an offence, by this<gap/> bye, against which<lb/> irons themselves<lb/> afford no <gap/>)<lb/> might, if found otherwise<lb/> incorrigible<lb/> be introduced by <gap/><gap/> a most nature<lb/> and <gap/><lb/> mode of prevention,<lb/> as well as punishment,<lb/> the prospect<lb/> of which would probably<lb/> be forever<lb/> sufficiant to render<lb/> the inflection of it<lb/> unnecessary. Punishment,<lb/> was in its<lb/> most horrid form<lb/> <gap/> its action the <gap/><lb/> when benefit of that uncetainty,<lb/> without which the rashest desperate<lb/> would not expose<lb/> himself to its strobe<lb/> <add>if an instance be <gap/> through what</add><add></add> the means<lb/> are, which the 10<lb/> effect <gap/><gap/><lb/> Laws of England<lb/> <gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><lb/> in one of its <gap/><lb/> admired branches, <del><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/></del><lb/> <del><gap/><gap/><gap/></del><lb/> <del><gap/><gap/><gap/></del><lb/> <del><gap/><gap/></del> <add>to work</add> upon<lb/> its favourite class<lb/> of Judges? What <gap/><lb/> Death? and that<lb/> no common death,<lb/> but death this, <gap/><lb/><gap/> necessary needs<lb/> of Lingering toture,<lb/> And yet, whatever<lb/> other reproach the<lb/> the law may be thought<lb/> to merit <del><gap/></del><lb/> in what in <gap/><lb/> was it ever seen to<lb/> explore its <gap/> this<lb/> <add>was</add> to the reproach<lb/> of cruelty?
(an offence, by this<lb/>
</note>
bye, against which<lb/>
irons themselves<lb/>
afford no security)<lb/>
might, if found otherwise<lb/>
incorrigible<lb/>
be introduced by gagging:<lb/>
a most natural<lb/>
and efficacious<lb/>
mode of prevention,<lb/>
as well as punishment,<lb/>
the prospect<lb/>
of which would probably<lb/>
be forever<lb/>
sufficient, to render<lb/>
the infliction of it<lb/>
unnecessary.  Punishment,<lb/>
even in its<lb/>
most horrid form<lb/>
loses its odious character,<lb/>
when benefit of that uncertainty,<lb/>
without which the<lb/>
rashest desperado<lb/>
would not expose<lb/>
himself to its stroke.<lb/>
If an instance be wanted,<lb/>
<del>To produce</del> <add>think what</add> the means<lb/>
are, which the so<lb/>
effect <del>aimed at by<lb/>
the</del>
<add>much admired</add> Laws of England<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> makes use of, and that<lb/>
in one of its most<lb/>
admired branches,<lb/>
<del>what <add>are</add> the <add>means</add> application<lb/>
which  that so<lb/>
much admired law<lb/>
makes use of</del><lb/> <add>to work</add> upon<lb/>
its favourite class<lb/> of Judges?  What but<lb/>
Death? and that<lb/>
no common death,<lb/>
but death the slow<lb/>
but necessary result<lb/>
of lingering torture.<lb/>
And yet, whatever<lb/>
other reproach the<lb/>
law may be thought<lb/>
to merit <del>is the <gap/></del><lb/>
in what in instance<lb/>
was it ever seen to<lb/>
expose itself <del>on</del> <add>in</add> this<lb/>
<del>account</del> <add>way</add> to the reproach<lb/>
of cruelty?</note></p>
<p><head>Letter <del>8</del> VIII.</head></p>
<p>In my last I endeavoured to state to you the advantages, which<lb/>
a receptacle, upon the plan of my Brother's proposed building, seemed to<lb/>
promise, in its application to places of confinement, considered merely in<lb/>
that view:  Give me leave now to consider it as applicable to the joint purposes<lb/>
of punishment, reformation, <hi rend="underline">and peceuniary economy.</hi></p>  
<p>That in regard to person of the description of those to whom punishments<lb/>
of the nature in question are destined, solitude is in its nature<lb/>
subservient to the purpose of reformation, seems to be as little disputed,<lb/>
its tendency to operate in addition to the mass of sufferance.  But that <gap/><lb/>
this plan that purpose woul be effected, at last as completely as it could<lb/>
on any other, you cannot but see at the first glance, or rather you must<lb/>
have observed already.  In the condition of <hi rend="underline">our</hi> prisoner, (for so I call him<lb/>
for shortness value,) <add>you may see</add> the students paradox, <hi rend="underline">nunquam minus solus quam<lb/>solus</hi> realized in a new way;  to the Keeper a multitude though not a<lb/>
crowd; to themselves they are solitary and sequestered individuals.</p>  
<p>What is more, you will see this purpose answered more completely<lb/>
this plan than it could possibly be any other.  What degree of solitude which<lb/>  
was proposed to reduce them to in the once-intended Penitentiary house<lb/>
you need not trouble yourself to consider:  but for one purpose, in building<lb/>
of every mode of construction that could thence and there have been in view<lb/>
it would have been necessary, according to the express regulations of that <unclear>plan</unclear><lb/>
that the law of solitude should be dispensed with:  I mean, so often as the<lb/>
prisoners were to receive the benefits of attendance on divine service.  But<lb/>
<add><unclear>must</unclear></add></p>  
<p><head>Note continued</head></p>  
<p>intermediate area, might be precluded by a rail from approaching nearly<lb/>
than to certain distance from the Cells:  and in some cases all conversation<lb/>
between them and the prisoners might be interdicted altogether.  The propriety<lb/>
of such a regulation may be thought to stand upon a different fooling<lb/>
according as the confinement was previous <del>t</del> or subsequent to conviction<lb/>
and according to the nature  of the offence, and the intended severity<lb/>
of the punishment.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 02:54, 25 April 2022

Click Here To Edit

10

walls have been found occasionally unavailing: upon this plan, the thinne
would be sufficient: a circumstance which must operate in a striking degree
towards a diminution of the expence.

In this, as in every other application of the plan, you find its ient
not less conspicuous than its coercive, tendency: insomuch that, if you were
be asked, who had most cause to wish for its adoption, you might find yourself
at some loss to determine, between the malefactors themselves, and those
those for whose sake they are consigned to punishment.

In this view, I am sure, you cannot overlook the effect which it would
have in rendering unnecessary that inexhaustible fund of disproportionable
too often needless, and always unpopular severity, not to say extortion,
the use of irons. Confined in one of these Cells, every motion of his limbs
and every muscle of his face, exposed to view, what pretence could there be
for exposing to this hardship even the most boisterous malefactor? In
with perfect liberty wihin the space allotted to him, is what worn way could
he vent his rage than by beating his head against the wall? and who by
himself would be a sufferer by such folly?

Noise, the only
offence, by which a
man, thus encaged,
could render himself
troublesome,
(an offence, by this
bye, against which
irons themselves
afford no security)
might, if found otherwise
incorrigible
be introduced by gagging:
a most natural
and efficacious
mode of prevention,
as well as punishment,
the prospect
of which would probably
be forever
sufficient, to render
the infliction of it
unnecessary. Punishment,
even in its
most horrid form
loses its odious character,
when benefit of that uncertainty,
without which the
rashest desperado
would not expose
himself to its stroke.
If an instance be wanted,
To produce think what the means
are, which the so
effect aimed at by
the
much admired Laws of England
makes use of, and that
in one of its most
admired branches,
what are the means application
which that so
much admired law
makes use of

to work upon
its favourite class
of Judges? What but
Death? and that
no common death,
but death the slow
but necessary result
of lingering torture.
And yet, whatever
other reproach the
law may be thought
to merit is the
in what in instance
was it ever seen to
expose itself on in this
account way to the reproach
of cruelty?

Letter 8 VIII.

In my last I endeavoured to state to you the advantages, which
a receptacle, upon the plan of my Brother's proposed building, seemed to
promise, in its application to places of confinement, considered merely in
that view: Give me leave now to consider it as applicable to the joint purposes
of punishment, reformation, and peceuniary economy.

That in regard to person of the description of those to whom punishments
of the nature in question are destined, solitude is in its nature
subservient to the purpose of reformation, seems to be as little disputed,
its tendency to operate in addition to the mass of sufferance. But that
this plan that purpose woul be effected, at last as completely as it could
on any other, you cannot but see at the first glance, or rather you must
have observed already. In the condition of our prisoner, (for so I call him
for shortness value,) you may see the students paradox, nunquam minus solus quam
solus
realized in a new way; to the Keeper a multitude though not a
crowd; to themselves they are solitary and sequestered individuals.

What is more, you will see this purpose answered more completely
this plan than it could possibly be any other. What degree of solitude which
was proposed to reduce them to in the once-intended Penitentiary house
you need not trouble yourself to consider: but for one purpose, in building
of every mode of construction that could thence and there have been in view
it would have been necessary, according to the express regulations of that plan
that the law of solitude should be dispensed with: I mean, so often as the
prisoners were to receive the benefits of attendance on divine service. But
must

Note continued

intermediate area, might be precluded by a rail from approaching nearly
than to certain distance from the Cells: and in some cases all conversation
between them and the prisoners might be interdicted altogether. The propriety
of such a regulation may be thought to stand upon a different fooling
according as the confinement was previous t or subsequent to conviction
and according to the nature of the offence, and the intended severity
of the punishment.


Identifier: | JB/550/213/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 550.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

550

Main Headings

Folio number

213

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in