JB/091/003/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/091/003/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/091/003/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/003/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/003/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->19 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1807<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
Superseded?</p>
 
<p><del>In</del> The view thus taken of the subject should it be fortunate<lb/>
 
enough to obtain  <add>its information from Your Lordships <del><gap/></del> confident eye</add> Your Lordships concurrence</p>
 
<p>My respect for Your Lordships virtues will not permitt me<lb/>
to doubt of Your Lordships sincere desire to apply to<lb/>
the evil <add>disorder</add> a radical cure.  <add>Inclination is indubitable out of doubt:  but is power sufficient?</add>  Your wishes I make sure of –<lb/>
but have they <add>are they <del><gap/></del> accompanied with</add> power sufficient for carry them into effect?<lb/>
Mistake me not, my Lord.  <del>it is not Your Lordships in</del><lb/>
The subject of my doubt <add>question</add> is – not whether Your Lordship be<lb/>
strong enough in Parliament, but whether Parliament itself<lb/>
be strong enough against the lawyers?  Proofs of its not being <add>Instances where it has<lb/>
not been so</add> so, present themselves but be abundantly to my view:  but on<lb/>
this subject I may have occasion to address <add>speak to</add> Your Lordship<lb/>
more particularly in another place.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 04:40, 3 May 2022

Click Here To Edit

19 Jany 1807
Superseded?

In The view thus taken of the subject should it be fortunate
enough to obtain its information from Your Lordships confident eye Your Lordships concurrence

My respect for Your Lordships virtues will not permitt me
to doubt of Your Lordships sincere desire to apply to
the evil disorder a radical cure. Inclination is indubitable out of doubt: but is power sufficient? Your wishes I make sure of –
but have they are they accompanied with power sufficient for carry them into effect?
Mistake me not, my Lord. it is not Your Lordships in
The subject of my doubt question is – not whether Your Lordship be
strong enough in Parliament, but whether Parliament itself
be strong enough against the lawyers? Proofs of its not being Instances where it has
not been so
so, present themselves but be abundantly to my view: but on
this subject I may have occasion to address speak to Your Lordship
more particularly in another place.


Identifier: | JB/091/003/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91.

Date_1

1807-01-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

091

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

003

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

iping 1804

Marginals

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1804

Notes public

"superseded?"

ID Number

28999

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in