JB/078/067/001

Click Here To Edit

1826 Aug. 23

Review of Humphrey §. J.B. and H: language
as to Judges &

This difference in the course taken by the two reformist
was the natural mode of their the difference in their different practices or events

2
Cause of the difference

Mr Bentham having from the first withdrawn himself it
from the world took advantage of the practice to declare in relation
to every touched upon him, his opinions and without
reserve. Knowing that with the of his Panopticon plan
for prisoners and paupers every thing that in the way of reform or
improvement he could propose was repugnant to the particular
interest of the ruling few, he that all attempts at liation
would necessarily be formless. He therefore as an early in the lasting period of his
labours turn away the scabbard, and applied within
reserve to whatsoever adversary course i his way

Becoming as was this conduct on the point of Mr Bentham
becoming because rendered so by an unhappy and in ble
necessity not less becoming has been the directly opposite conduct on
the part of Mr Humphreys. In so far as the nature of the
case admitted, every thing he says is impersonalized: the reproach
so justl richly merited by by all has been ured by him
from falling on any one.

Identifier: | JB/078/067/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.
Date_1	1826-08-21	Marginal Summary Numbering	2
Box	078	Main Headings	Review of Humphreys
Folio number	067	Info in main headings field	Review of Humphreys
Image	001	Titles
Category	Text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	C2 / E2
Penner		Watermarks
Marginals	Jeremy Bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	25158
Box Contents