★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
exclusion.<lb/> | exclusion.<lb/> | ||
p. 2<lb/></p> | p. 2<lb/></p> | ||
<p>4.<lb/> | |||
Cases for exclusion reducible<lb/> | |||
to two - viz<lb/> | |||
1. Danger of misdecision<lb/> | |||
not increased<lb/> | |||
2 Greater injustice saved <lb/> | |||
Exemplification further<lb/> | |||
on.<lb/> | |||
p.3<lb/></p> | |||
<p>5.<lb/> | |||
Modifications of Case 1<lb/> | |||
1. Irrelevancy<lb/> | |||
2. Persuasive force of<lb/> | |||
the <unclear>mass</unclear> not lessened.<lb/> | |||
3. — <gap/> sufficient notwithstanding.<lb/> | |||
4. — the article in question<lb/> | |||
<unclear>inoperative</unclear> because<lb/> | |||
outweighed.<lb/> | |||
p. 3<lb/></p> | |||
<p>5<hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi><lb/> | |||
In legislation, necessity<lb/> | |||
of a <hi rend="underline"><sic>compleat</sic> view</hi> of<lb/> | |||
all the advantages, all<lb/> | |||
the disadvantages on<lb/> | |||
both sides.<lb/> | |||
The arrangement <unclear>hence</unclear><lb/> | |||
gives the <hi rend="underline">pourquoi</hi> along<lb/> | |||
with the <hi rend="underline">quoi.</hi><lb/> | |||
p. 3<lb/></p> | |||
6 May 1806
EVID. B. .Exclusion Introdn Ch. .Exclusn Proper Short View
S.1. Grounds of Exclusion
1.
Exclusion tho' generally
improper, proper when
admission wod produce
preponderant vexation
expence & delay.
p.1.
2.
Expence & vexation
are the inseparable
concomitants of the
receipt of evidence.
Reason sufficient for
the exclusion of the
proposed evidence: if
irrelevant, or the demand
for it outweighed
by the vexation & expence.
3.
The onus of proving
the irrelevancy or preponderancy
lies however on
him who calls for the
exclusion.
p. 2
4.
Cases for exclusion reducible
to two - viz
1. Danger of misdecision
not increased
2 Greater injustice saved
Exemplification further
on.
p.3
5.
Modifications of Case 1
1. Irrelevancy
2. Persuasive force of
the mass not lessened.
3. — sufficient notwithstanding.
4. — the article in question
inoperative because
outweighed.
p. 3
5(a)
In legislation, necessity
of a compleat view of
all the advantages, all
the disadvantages on
both sides.
The arrangement hence
gives the pourquoi along
with the quoi.
p. 3
|
Identifier: | JB/047/030/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1806-05-06 |
1-5, 5a, 6, 1-8 |
||
|
047 |
evidence |
||
|
030 |
[[info_in_main_headings_field::evid. b [ ] exclusion ch. 6 exclusn proper short view]] |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
marginal summary sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d5 |
||
|
john herbert koe |
iping 1804 |
||
|
bernardino rivadavia |
|||
|
1804 |
|||
|
14898 |
|||
