JB/047/010/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:48, 26 October 2022

THEFT CORRECTIVES to ANOMALITIES

When I, speak of the Statues of
which I am about to give an
account as correctives of the
anomality of the aforementioned
doctrines, I mean by as means
to apply my approbation to the
quantum of the new punishment inflicted by them respectively but to
its' proportion to the old punishment
annexed to the original stock of
offences comprized under that the title
in question: which stock I maintain
had nothing to distinguish it in point of
reason & from the articles which an
approval of them as enduring
like Law, where I maintain
there was like reason: I approve
of them relatively as consistent,
not absolutely as proper.

Under this Idea, I shall even include
in the Catalogue Statutes
which have done nothing more than
take away the benefit of Clergy from
offences parcel of the original Stock
and consequently annex to each offence
the punishment of Death which
did not in every contingency belong
to them before, because that Punishment
belonging at present to above
all, may must now be considered as the general
Rule Pattern of Punishment, to from which the lesser
punishment which still subsist in a
few cases can as it were but so many exceptions deviations

Identifier: \| JB/047/010/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	047	Main Headings	evidence
Folio number	010	Info in main headings field	theft correctives to anomalities
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	j honig & zoonen
Marginals		Paper Producer	cc1
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	14878
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/047/010/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<p><head>THEFT CORRECTIVES to <unclear>ANOMALITES</unclear></head></p>
+<p><head>THEFT CORRECTIVES to <unclear>ANOMALITIES</unclear></head></p>
 <p>When I, speak of the Statues of<lb/>
 which I am about to give an<lb/>
@@ Line 13: / Line 12: @@
 its' <hi rend="underline">proportion</hi> to the <add>old</add> punishment<lb/>
 annexed to the original stock of<lb/>
-offences comprized under <del>that</del> <add>the</add> <unclear>like</unclear><lb/>
+offences comprized under <del>that</del> <add>the</add> <unclear>title</unclear><lb/>
+in question:  which stock I maintain<lb/>
-in question &amp; which stock I maintain<lb/>
 had nothing to distinguish it in point of<lb/>
 reason &amp; from the articles which an<lb/>
@@ Line 23: / Line 21: @@
 of them <hi rend="underline">relatively</hi> as consistent,<lb/>
 not <hi rend="underline">absolutely</hi> as proper.</p>
 <p>Under this Idea, I shall even include<lb/>
 in the Catalogue Statutes<lb/>
@@ Line 36: / Line 33: @@
 all, may <add>must now</add> be considered as the  general<lb/>
 Rule <add>Pattern</add> of Punishment, to <add>from</add> which the lesser<lb/>
-punishment which still <gap/> in a<lb/>
+punishment which still subsist in a<lb/>
-few cases can as it were but so many <del><gap/></del> <add><unclear>divinations</unclear></add></p>
+few cases can as it were but so many <del>exceptions</del> <add>deviations</add></p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Views

JB/047/010/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:48, 26 October 2022

Navigation

Search