JB/547/042/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/547/042/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/042/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/042/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>The difference between
</p>
<p><!-- pencil -->7 Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1810<lb/>
<p><!-- pencil -->7 Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1810<lb/>
<!-- pencil --><head>Defence, Economy</head></p>
<!-- pencil --><head>Defence, Economy</head></p>
Line 22: Line 16:
compleat substitution of the natural to the technical system<lb/>
compleat substitution of the natural to the technical system<lb/>
of procedure would suffice.</p>
of procedure would suffice.</p>
 
<p>The difference between these two systems <add>of which happily</add> the natural<lb/>
 
system is not less in use though so much less noticed than<lb/>
 
the technical has been explained pretty much at large in<lb/>
another work.<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi> Scotch Reform.  Lett. 1.</note></p>
<p>The enormous <add>prodigious</add> mass of perjury <add>so</add> regularly organized <add>generated<lb/>
and emitted</add> in this Court has afforded a subject of an inadversion<lb/>
to M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> <unclear>Stevens</unclear> in his celebrated work intituled War in<lb/>
disguise.</p>
<p><del>To</del> A cause to which <del>he</del> <add>that gentleman ascribes</add> <unclear>imputes</unclear> this enormity is the<lb/>
perverse and immoral character <add>frame of mind</add> of <add>Anglo-</add>American <del><gap/><lb/>
of</del> navigation.</p>
<p>A cause to which he does not ascribe any share<lb/>
in the production of it is the mode employed in those Courts<lb/>
for the <add>collection and</add> extraction of the evidence:  a mode in which neither<lb/>
vivâ voce <add>cross</add> examination two questions arising out of the<lb/>
answers nor publicity of the process <add>in the operation</add> nor the presidence<lb/>
or presence of the Judge by whom the evidence in question<lb/>
is taken for the ground of his decision have any place.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 00:27, 6 November 2022

Click Here To Edit

7 Novr 1810
Defence, Economy

For removing the discourse general at present protection
afforded under and by virtue of the existing System to
the force and commercial property of enemies and fraudulent neutrals
the foregoing so far as can it is afforded by
the virtual penalty imposed as above on capto
capturing Commanders the foregoing provisions to the foregoing
effect might suffice.

But, for converting a compleat and radical cure
remedy to all the abuses of which the practice of those
Courts is compared, neither more nor less than the
compleat substitution of the natural to the technical system
of procedure would suffice.

The difference between these two systems of which happily the natural
system is not less in use though so much less noticed than
the technical has been explained pretty much at large in
another work.+ + Scotch Reform. Lett. 1.

The enormous prodigious mass of perjury so regularly organized generated
and emitted
in this Court has afforded a subject of an inadversion
to Mr Stevens in his celebrated work intituled War in
disguise.

To A cause to which he that gentleman ascribes imputes this enormity is the
perverse and immoral character frame of mind of Anglo-American
of
navigation.

A cause to which he does not ascribe any share
in the production of it is the mode employed in those Courts
for the collection and extraction of the evidence: a mode in which neither
vivâ voce cross examination two questions arising out of the
answers nor publicity of the process in the operation nor the presidence
or presence of the Judge by whom the evidence in question
is taken for the ground of his decision have any place.


Identifier: | JB/547/042/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 547.

Date_1

1810-11-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

"18 or 1, 19 or 2, 20 or 3, 21 or 4"

Box

547

Main Headings

Folio number

042

Info in main headings field

Defence of Economy

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in