JB/042/433/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/433/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


1824. July 22
<!-- Code from "permission" -->
Constitutional Code.


+ 4
<head>1824. July 22<lb/>
Copd
Constitutional Code.</head>
4


Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
<note>+ 4<lb/>
&sect;.17.
Cop<hi rend="superscript">d</hi><lb/>
4</note>


Art. 7. 1. Case suppose that of a contract: the contract, for
<note>Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively<lb/>
example between the Merchant and <gap/> the Jew of Venice: fabulous, it
&sect;.17.</note>
will not <gap/> be less serve for illustration than explanatory than if real. Money lost: on
failure of pay repayment by a certain day, power to <gap/> Creditor
to cut from the body of <gap/> debtor a pound of flesh; taken from any
part, at pleasure creditors choice. Regarding this contract in being of the number
of those by the observe <gap/> observance of which greater evil would be
done than by the breach, <gap/> <gap/> the Judge proceeds as
above. offering the power of choice proposing transmitting proposed amendment as per &sect;.16. <gap/> and proposes and offers for
suspension <gap/> offering the those power of d<gap/> as <gap/> above Art. 3.
<gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/>. Of those suspension decrees if confirmed
by <gap/><gap/> the Legislature, namely by <gap/> namely by local consent
given to the proposed Judiciary amendment
<gap/><gap/> the proposed amendment, the effect <gap/><gap/> will
as in case 1, be retroactive. But, that <gap/> in this case the proceeding retroactivity is at
the least not less irreproachable than if in Case 1: not less than if, by the Judge as according to the fable,
permission to cut the flesh, can offend on no other ground than having no been granted, were in effect
retracted, by <gap/> clogging it with a condition impossible to be fulfilled.
flesh the in that permission the permission to draw blood <gap/> not
to wit <gap/> the forbearing that of forbearance to shed blood. The cases that Instead
<gap/><gap/><gap/> an interpretation was rather as <gap/> <gap/>
of fulfilment of the contract this would be disobedience authorizing a breach of it
of the <gap/> supposed <gap/><gap/> fulfilment for supposing the an act <gap/>
<gap/> authorized and commanded by law so is every other act necessary to the performance of it.


<p>Art. 7. 1. Case, <del>suppose</del> <add>that of</add> a contract: the contract, for<lb/>
example between the Merchant and <del><gap/></del> <add>the</add> Jew of Venice: fabulous, it<lb/>
will not <add><del><gap/></del> be</add> less <del>serve for illustration than</del> <add>explanatory than</add> if real. Money lost: on<lb/>
failure of <del>pay</del> repayment by a certain day, power to <del><gap/></del> Creditor<lb/>
to cut from <del>the</del> body of <del><gap/></del> debtor a pound of flesh; <del>taken</del> from any<lb/>
part, at <del>pleasure</del> <add>creditors choice</add>. Regarding this contract in being of the number<lb/>
of those by <del>the observe <gap/></del> <add>observance</add> of which greater evil would be<lb/>
done than by the breach, <del><gap/> <gap/></del> the Judge proceeds as<lb/>
above, <del>offering the power of choice</del> <del><add>proposing</add></del> <add>transmitting proposed</add> <add>amendment</add> as per &sect;.16. <del><gap/> and proposes</del> <add>and <del>offers</del> for</add><lb/>
suspension <del><gap/></del> offering <unclear>the those power of decree</unclear> as <del>per</del> <add>above</add> Art. 3.<lb/>
<del><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/>.</del> Of those suspension decrees if confirmed<lb/>
by <del><gap/><gap/></del> <add>the</add> Legislature, <del>namely by <gap/></del> <add>namely by tacit consent</add><lb/>
given to the proposed Judiciary amendment<lb/>
<del><gap/><gap/> the proposed amendment</del>, the effect <del><gap/><gap/></del> <add>will</add><lb/>
as in case 1, <add>be retroactive.</add> But, <del>that <gap/></del> in this case the <del>proceeding</del> <add>retroactivity</add> is at<lb/>
the least not less irreproachable than <del>if,</del> <add>in Case 1: not less than if, by the Judge</add> as according to the fable,<lb/>
permission to cut the flesh, can offend on no other ground than having no been granted, were in effect<lb/>
retracted, by <gap/> clogging it with a condition impossible to be fulfilled.<lb/>
flesh the in that permission the permission to draw blood <gap/> not<lb/>
to wit <gap/> the forbearing that of forbearance to shed blood. The cases that Instead<lb/>
<gap/><gap/><gap/> an interpretation was rather as <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
of fulfilment of the contract this would be disobedience authorizing a breach of it<lb/>
of the <gap/> supposed <gap/><gap/> fulfilment for supposing the an act <gap/><lb/>
<gap/> authorized and commanded by law so is every other act necessary to the performance of it.</p>


<p>&#9758; To T.C. IN place of this transcribe here what is in the <gap/></p>
<!-- The remainder of the page is deleted -->
<p>Art. 8. 3. Case 3 <gap/> a Conveyance. Under the <gap/><lb/>
of the existing law law as it stands, by transfer made in life time or by testament<lb/>
a certain disposition is made by an individual of a certain<lb/>
mass of property. On inspection and consideration of the case it appears to the<lb/>
Judge that this transfer though warranted by teh letter of the<lb/>
law, is inconsistent with the policy and general charge of the<lb/>
law as manifested in all other <gap/> that has been observed.<lb/>
Of his own nature or at the instance of this or that on application made by a certain individual,<lb/>
he proposes an appropriate amendment which by the<lb/>
Legislature is either adopted or rejected. If by the a retroactive effect given<lb/>
to the amendment no person as yet born is affected, he may be right<lb/>
in having such effect to be produced. If on the contrary a person <gap/><lb/>
<gap/> of an age to experience disappointment from such a change is in<lb/>
being, he may be right in preventing f<gap/> p<gap/> the retroactive effect <gap/> which <gap/><lb/>
by such disappointment would be produced: for supposing the policy pursued<lb/>
on<lb/>
<note>on this occasion by the legislation<lb/>
to be such as is<lb/>
required by the greatest<lb/>
happiness principle, still<lb/>
what may very well be<lb/>
is &#x2014; that by a single <gap/><lb/>
<gap/> <gap/> so made as a <gap/><lb/>
no sensible evil will be produced: and by the future operation of the law in its amended state, all future evil from the source in question will be prevented.</note></p>
<!-- Left margin -->
<note>this case it may be that no retroactive</note>
<note>in this case to give effect to the amendment<lb/>
any suspension as above wd. be acquisite. For in</note>





Revision as of 08:33, 27 January 2023

Click Here To Edit


1824. July 22
Constitutional Code.

+ 4
Copd
4

Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
§.17.

Art. 7. 1. Case, suppose that of a contract: the contract, for
example between the Merchant and the Jew of Venice: fabulous, it
will not be less serve for illustration than explanatory than if real. Money lost: on
failure of pay repayment by a certain day, power to Creditor
to cut from the body of debtor a pound of flesh; taken from any
part, at pleasure creditors choice. Regarding this contract in being of the number
of those by the observe observance of which greater evil would be
done than by the breach, the Judge proceeds as
above, offering the power of choice proposing transmitting proposed amendment as per §.16. and proposes and offers for
suspension offering the those power of decree as per above Art. 3.
. Of those suspension decrees if confirmed
by the Legislature, namely by namely by tacit consent
given to the proposed Judiciary amendment
the proposed amendment, the effect will
as in case 1, be retroactive. But, that in this case the proceeding retroactivity is at
the least not less irreproachable than if, in Case 1: not less than if, by the Judge as according to the fable,
permission to cut the flesh, can offend on no other ground than having no been granted, were in effect
retracted, by clogging it with a condition impossible to be fulfilled.
flesh the in that permission the permission to draw blood not
to wit the forbearing that of forbearance to shed blood. The cases that Instead
an interpretation was rather as
of fulfilment of the contract this would be disobedience authorizing a breach of it
of the supposed fulfilment for supposing the an act
authorized and commanded by law so is every other act necessary to the performance of it.

☞ To T.C. IN place of this transcribe here what is in the

Art. 8. 3. Case 3 a Conveyance. Under the
of the existing law law as it stands, by transfer made in life time or by testament
a certain disposition is made by an individual of a certain
mass of property. On inspection and consideration of the case it appears to the
Judge that this transfer though warranted by teh letter of the
law, is inconsistent with the policy and general charge of the
law as manifested in all other that has been observed.
Of his own nature or at the instance of this or that on application made by a certain individual,
he proposes an appropriate amendment which by the
Legislature is either adopted or rejected. If by the a retroactive effect given
to the amendment no person as yet born is affected, he may be right
in having such effect to be produced. If on the contrary a person
of an age to experience disappointment from such a change is in
being, he may be right in preventing f p the retroactive effect which
by such disappointment would be produced: for supposing the policy pursued
on
on this occasion by the legislation
to be such as is
required by the greatest
happiness principle, still
what may very well be
is — that by a single
so made as a
no sensible evil will be produced: and by the future operation of the law in its amended state, all future evil from the source in question will be prevented.

this case it may be that no retroactive

in this case to give effect to the amendment
any suspension as above wd. be acquisite. For in




Identifier: | JB/042/433/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1824-07-22

Marginal Summary Numbering

7-8

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

433

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d4 / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

"copd"

ID Number

13356

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in