JB/147/349/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/147/349/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/147/349/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/349/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/349/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->1 March 1810<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Sinecures</head></p>
 
<p>I say what <add>is professed</add> purports to be afforded.  For besides <add>not content with</add> being<lb/>
 
uninsructive <del>matter</del> the information thus given, <add>would</add> if credited<lb/>
 
be delusive.  What in every instance is professed to be<lb/>
reported is the gross amount:  of which term <hi rend="underline">gross</hi> some<lb/>
explanation might not <add>altogether</add> unreasonably have been expected.<lb/>
But what in some instances is reported is the neat<lb/>
<add>the clear</add> amount:  at any rate the amount clear of all deductions<lb/>
unless land tax and property tax be to be excepted.<lb/>
In this predicament for example stand the Auditorship<lb/>
of the Exchequer £4,000 a year:  also the two <unclear>unreduced</unclear><lb/>
Tellerships £2,700 a year each.  But in this same<lb/>
predicament can not stand <del>the</del> either of the two unreduced<lb/>
Tellerships:  viz. <del>Earl Camden's</del> <add>the Marquis of Buckingham's</add> of £23,093 and Earl<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> Camden's of £23,117:  for in each instance<lb/>
in neither Column is inserted an intimation in these words<lb/>
viz. Deputy and Clerks paid out of it.</p>
<p>In it may <add>perhaps</add> be said no delusion here:  for here,<lb/>
according to your own showing, the misconception is obviated<lb/>
and prevented.  In Column 3 the amount is stated<lb/>
to be gross:  i.e. subject to deductions, and in Column 2<lb/>
in a line with the sum inserted in Col. 3, a statement is<lb/>
given from what sources those deductions are derived.<lb/>
Of the 93 articles contained in this N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> are <add>is</add> those <del>any</del> for<lb/>
example any <hi rend="underline">one</hi> in <add>the instance of</add> which from the sum reported in the<lb/>
Column of sums <add>a</add> deduction is made of which no intimation<lb/>
is given in the other column <add>which stands next</add> close to it?  If yes, then<lb/>
here we have a misrepresentation to the prejudice of the holder<lb/>
of the Sinecure <del>thus</del> to which a value greater than its real value<lb/>
is thus ascribed.  Whether in any one instance of any, this <add>is</add> be the<lb/>
case is more than I can pretend to say, more than the information<lb/>
thus presented will upon the fact of it warrant any man in saying.<lb/>
But upon that subject<lb/>
some light may <add>perhaps</add> be thrown<lb/>
by the information presented by the committee of 1797.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 01:59, 27 January 2023

Click Here To Edit

1 March 1810
Sinecures

I say what is professed purports to be afforded. For besides not content with being
uninsructive matter the information thus given, would if credited
be delusive. What in every instance is professed to be
reported is the gross amount: of which term gross some
explanation might not altogether unreasonably have been expected.
But what in some instances is reported is the neat
the clear amount: at any rate the amount clear of all deductions
unless land tax and property tax be to be excepted.
In this predicament for example stand the Auditorship
of the Exchequer £4,000 a year: also the two unreduced
Tellerships £2,700 a year each. But in this same
predicament can not stand the either of the two unreduced
Tellerships: viz. Earl Camden's the Marquis of Buckingham's of £23,093 and Earl
Camden's of £23,117: for in each instance
in neither Column is inserted an intimation in these words
viz. Deputy and Clerks paid out of it.

In it may perhaps be said no delusion here: for here,
according to your own showing, the misconception is obviated
and prevented. In Column 3 the amount is stated
to be gross: i.e. subject to deductions, and in Column 2
in a line with the sum inserted in Col. 3, a statement is
given from what sources those deductions are derived.
Of the 93 articles contained in this No are is those any for
example any one in the instance of which from the sum reported in the
Column of sums a deduction is made of which no intimation
is given in the other column which stands next close to it? If yes, then
here we have a misrepresentation to the prejudice of the holder
of the Sinecure thus to which a value greater than its real value
is thus ascribed. Whether in any one instance of any, this is be the
case is more than I can pretend to say, more than the information
thus presented will upon the fact of it warrant any man in saying.
But upon that subject
some light may perhaps be thrown
by the information presented by the committee of 1797.


Identifier: | JB/147/349/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 147.

Date_1

1810-03-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-2

Box

147

Main Headings

Sinecures

Folio number

349

Info in main headings field

Sinecures

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C3 / E4

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

49574

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in