JB/147/374/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/147/374/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/147/374/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/374/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/374/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->13 Mar. 1810</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><del>The</del> Of these the first that occurrs is that which occurrs<lb/>
 
in N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 81 <hi rend="underline">England</hi>"  article 11.  The Office here in question<lb/>
 
is that of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Garner the Apothecary General to the army<lb/>
 
<del><gap/></del> stated here simply Apothecary General, as if <del>the</del><lb/>
like the Attorney General he were so to the whole United<lb/>
Kingdom or at least one of its three component Kingdoms.<lb/>
True it is that in <add>and by</add> Column the 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> <del>the error</del> warning is given<lb/>
of the error, and that to one who <add>one eye</add> should undertake to read<lb/>
the contents of the document in <unclear>their</unclear> natural order, before<lb/>
it is <unclear>committed</unclear>.</p>
<p>But in an account containing a column of<lb/>
sums <del>nothing is more frequent than</del> <add>many are the occasions in which</add> many the<lb/>
purposes for which the eye glances over<add>up and down</add> that column<lb/>
without adverting to any other:  and so <add><unclear>often</unclear></add> sure as this<lb/>
is the case so often will the amount <add>of the emolument</add> in question<lb/>
appears three times as great as it was really.</p>
<p>While the other objects <del><gap/></del> before and after it are exhibited<lb/>
<add>at least for anything that upon the face of them appears to the contrary</add> in their real dimensions why is there one<lb/>
thus singled out to be thus magnified? this is a question<lb/>
this to which one can not but wish to be able to find<lb/>
an answer.</p>
<p>Was it the greatest mass of emolument which the whole<lb/>
sinecure list presented as finding its way into a single<lb/>
hand?  Not it indeed, and if it were, the greater it<lb/>
were in itself, the less it stood in and of <del><gap/></del> being<lb/>
exaggerated, and exaggerated by so extraordinary a course.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 00:19, 29 January 2023

Click Here To Edit

13 Mar. 1810

The Of these the first that occurrs is that which occurrs
in No 81 England" article 11. The Office here in question
is that of Mr Garner the Apothecary General to the army
stated here simply Apothecary General, as if the
like the Attorney General he were so to the whole United
Kingdom or at least one of its three component Kingdoms.
True it is that in and by Column the 2d the error warning is given
of the error, and that to one who one eye should undertake to read
the contents of the document in their natural order, before
it is committed.

But in an account containing a column of
sums nothing is more frequent than many are the occasions in which many the
purposes for which the eye glances overup and down that column
without adverting to any other: and so often sure as this
is the case so often will the amount of the emolument in question
appears three times as great as it was really.

While the other objects before and after it are exhibited
at least for anything that upon the face of them appears to the contrary in their real dimensions why is there one
thus singled out to be thus magnified? this is a question
this to which one can not but wish to be able to find
an answer.

Was it the greatest mass of emolument which the whole
sinecure list presented as finding its way into a single
hand? Not it indeed, and if it were, the greater it
were in itself, the less it stood in and of being
exaggerated, and exaggerated by so extraordinary a course.


Identifier: | JB/147/374/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 147.

Date_1

1810-03-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

147

Main Headings

Sinecures

Folio number

374

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

E4

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

49599

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in