JB/117/285/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:01, 22 March 2023

18 Jany. 1811
J.B. to Treasury

18
Letter 11
(2)

26
So in the h being
assured J.B. accepts
it, but only because
otherwise he would
get nothing

This, Sir, is clearly in every other particular than
the antecedent fixation of the day and the set responsibility
of the form subjection to the law (I mean in the burthensome sense of the
word responsibility) does the appellation do the characters of Bankruptcy
belong to the transaction, that time and
for no other reason than that the any debtors are within
the rules — 10s in the pound, and that not promised is held out to h
me as the composition the utmost composition, that
I am allowed so much as to think of.

Well, Sir, 10s in the pound I will accept, if
it be impossible no more will be paid and only if
no more will be paid, and because no more will be
paid and because half a loaf is better than no
bread: but I do not accept it, but for these reasons
and declaring these to be my reasons, and because
it has ben been my misfortune to have for my
debtors a form when shape is within rules of the Kings Bench, [and whose
seat is above the law] and to whom it is matter
of pride and as well as safety to be above the rules of good Common
faith and honesty as well as those of law.

Identifier: \| JB/117/285/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117.
Date_1	1801-01-18	Marginal Summary Numbering	26
Box	117	Main Headings	panopticon versus new south wales
Folio number	285	Info in main headings field	jb to treasury
Image	001	Titles
Category	correspondence	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c2 / d18
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public	letter 2100, vol. 8	ID Number	38902
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/117/285/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<!-- in pencil --><head>18 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi>. 1811<lb/>J.B. to Treasury</head> <p>18<lb/><note>Letter 11</note><lb/>(2)</p> <!-- marginal summary in pencil --> ,p><note>26<lb/>So in the <del>h</del> being<lb/>assured J.B. accepts<lb/>it, but only because<lb/>otherwise he would<lb/>get nothing</note></p> <p>This, Sir, is clearly in every other particular than<lb/> the antecedent fixation of the day and the <add>set</add> responsibility<lb/>of the form <add>subjection to the law</add> (I mean in the <sic>burthensome</sic> sense of the<lb/>word responsibility) does the appellation <add>do the characters</add> of Bankruptcy<lb/>belong to the transaction, that time and<lb/>for no other reason than that the  <add>any</add> debtors are within<lb/>the <hi rend="underline">rules</hi> &#x2014; <gap/> in the period, <add>and that not promised</add> is held out to <del>h</del><lb/>use as the composition the utmost composition, that<lb/>
+<!-- in pencil --><head>18 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi>. 1811<lb/>J.B. to Treasury</head> <p>18<lb/><note>Letter 11</note><lb/>(2)</p> <!-- marginal summary in pencil --> <p><note>26<lb/>So in the <del>h</del> being<lb/>assured J.B. accepts<lb/>it, but only because<lb/>otherwise he would<lb/>get nothing</note></p> <p>This, Sir, is clearly in every other particular than<lb/> the antecedent fixation of the day and the <add><del>set</del></add> responsibility<lb/>of the form <add>subjection to the law</add> (I mean in the <sic>burthensome</sic> sense of the<lb/>word responsibility) does the appellation <add>do the characters</add> of Bankruptcy<lb/>belong to the transaction, that time and<lb/>for no other reason than that the  <add>any</add> debtors are within<lb/>the <hi rend="underline">rules</hi> &#x2014; 10<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> in the pound, <add>and that not promised</add> is held out to <del>h</del><lb/>me as the composition the utmost composition, that<lb/>I am allowed so much as to think of.</p> <p>Well, Sir, 10<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> in the pound I will accept, if<lb/><del>it be impossible</del> no more will be paid and only if<lb/>no more will be paid, and because no more will be<lb/>paid and because half a loaf is better than no<lb/>bread: but I do not accept it, but for these reasons<lb/>and declaring these to be my reasons, and because<lb/>it has <del>ben</del> been my misfortune to have for my<lb/>debtors a form when shape is within <unclear>rules</unclear> <add>of the Kings Bench</add>,<!-- brackets in pencil --> [and whose<lb/>seat is above the law] and to whom it is matter<lb/>
-I am allowed so much as to think of.</p> <p>Well, Sir, <gap/> in the period I will accept, if<lb/><del>it be impossible</del> no more will be paid send only if<lb/>no more will be paid, and because no more will be<lb/>paid and because half a loaf is better than no<lb/>bread: but I do not accept it, but for these reasons<lb/>and declaring these to be my reasons, and because<lb/>it has <del>ben</del> been my misfortune to have for my<lb/>debtors a firm when shop is within <gap/> <add>of the Kings Bench</add>,<!-- brackets in pencil --> [and whose<lb/>seat is above the law] and to whom it is matter<lb/>
 of pride and <add>as well as</add> safety to be above the rules of <add>good</add> <del>Common</del><lb/><add>faith and honesty</add> as well as those of law.</p>
@@ Line 9: / Line 8: @@
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Views

JB/117/285/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:01, 22 March 2023

Navigation

Search