JB/096/152/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/152/001: Difference between revisions

JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
have his choice which temptation he will make
have his choice which temptation he will make
it most difficult for men to run into.</p>
it most difficult for men to run into.</p>
<p>This is one reason &#x2014; there is yet another<lb/>
It respects the obligation the Legislator is under<lb/>
to pay attention <add>to popular sentiment:</add> <del>at least (</del> <sic>tho'</sic> not to be absolutely<lb/>
governed by<del>) popular <gap/><gap/></del> it. <del>The people</del> <add>A man</add></p>
<pb/>
<p>casts <del>their</del> <add>an</add> eye<del>s</del> over the penal System &#x2014; every<lb/>
now &amp; then <del>they</del> <add>he</add> will be forming <add>his</add> comparisons<lb/>
<del>They</del> <add>He</add> takes 2 crimes <add>with their punishments</add> &amp; brings them together<lb/>
<del>They</del> <del><add>He How like <gap/></add></del> perceives, <add>as he thinks,</add> a disproportion &#x2014; How <del>unlike</del> <add>equal</add><lb/>
these two crimes, say they, in their malignity<lb/>
&amp; yet how unequal their punishment! &#x2014; How<lb/>
unlike these two crimes in their malignity<lb/>
&amp; yet their punishment how equal!<lb/>
<del>they are</del> <add>he is</add> dissatisfied &#x2014;</p>
<p>In vain would you observe, that <del>those</del> the<lb/>
2 Crimes <add>in question</add> being such, that a man never has<lb/>
to choose between them, <del>that</del> nothing that<lb/>
the Legislator can do with respect to one<lb/>
having any influence on the other, they are<lb/>
disparate &amp; the proportion in their punishments<lb/>
is a matter of no consequence &#x2014;<lb/>
<del><gap/><gap/></del> <add>What this man sees <del>people <gap/><gap/></del></add> <del>the people see</del> is the disproportion:<lb/>
what <del>they</del> he does <hi rend='underline'>not</hi> see, <add>nor can be made to understand,</add> are, the reasons<lb/>
for neglecting it.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 21:50, 17 November 2011

Click Here To Edit

Of two Crimes of the same motive and opportunity
it concerns the Legislator to know
which is the greatest — why? because the a
person under temptation has his choice to make between
them: and by By setting therefore a heavier punishment
on that which is less most mischievous
the Legislator may determine that choice
in favour of that which is least mischievous.
Of two Crimes not of the same motive and
opportunity a person tempted has not his
choice — Is it Does it follow therefore that to know which
is greatest is no part of the Legislators' concern —
By no means — Perhaps not The person
tempted that is a person once actually fallen into the conjuncture of things which gives birth to from where arises the temptation may not have to choose between
them — but the Legislator himself may
have his choice which temptation he will make it most difficult for men to run into.

This is one reason — there is yet another
It respects the obligation the Legislator is under
to pay attention to popular sentiment: at least ( tho' not to be absolutely
governed by) popular it. The people A man


---page break---

casts their an eyes over the penal System — every
now & then they he will be forming his comparisons
They He takes 2 crimes with their punishments & brings them together
They He How like perceives, as he thinks, a disproportion — How unlike equal
these two crimes, say they, in their malignity
& yet how unequal their punishment! — How
unlike these two crimes in their malignity
& yet their punishment how equal!
they are he is dissatisfied —

In vain would you observe, that those the
2 Crimes in question being such, that a man never has
to choose between them, that nothing that
the Legislator can do with respect to one
having any influence on the other, they are
disparate & the proportion in their punishments
is a matter of no consequence —
What this man sees people the people see is the disproportion:
what they he does not see, nor can be made to understand, are, the reasons
for neglecting it.




Identifier: | JB/096/152/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

legislation

Folio number

152

Info in main headings field

aestimation proportion whether worth observing between offences not of the same motive and opportunity

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31156

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in