JB/081/136/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/081/136/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/081/136/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1829 May 10 +<lb/>Petitions</head> <!-- numbers in pencil --> <p>10<lb/><note>Dispatch Court</note><lb/>(4 <note>&sect;. Benefits</note></p> <p><del>Decided at the first interview might reasonably be expected<lb/>not the <gap/> <gap/> question following</del></p> <p><note>13<lb/>Example Will-interpretation<lb/>suit</note></p> <p>Take for example the case where the loss to one party the<lb/>given to another <gap/> upon the interpretation put upon a will><lb/>Suppose no <add>ground</add> rules <del>laid down</del> in the <add>Equity</add> book for the course to be taken<lb/>on the occasion of an interpretation to be put upon a will.<lb/>what would have been the consequence? that, on the occasion of<lb/>each individual will, supposing the <gap/> of the <gap/> was to<lb/>be contrary to law, the sole question of the judge would have been<lb/>what was actually the intention of <del><gap/></del> <add>that</add> <gap/> testator wherein<lb?>the general rule having been laid down <del>the question</del> and on<lb/>the individual occasion in question compliance given to it,<lb/>the <del><gap/></del> standard conformed to will have been not the intention<lb/>of the testator, but the meaning of the rule.  Things being<lb/>in that state according to the rule the Commissioner will<lb/>decide in a manner most pleasing to most audiences to the happiness<lb/>of learned Lords and gentlemen.  But, deciding according to<lb/>the intention of the testator he will decide in a manner most<lb/>conducive to the happiness of <del><gap/></del> of every body else: for <del:>the</del> if the<lb/>course be taken the tendency will be to exclude all <del>who are</del> the<lb/>fear of the frustration of their <gap/> as expressed by their last wills,<lb/>wherein by deciding otherwise than according to such intention, the<lb/>tendency of the course be taken will be to give to an indefinite<lb/>extent birth to that same fear.</p> <p><del><gap/></del> In this <del>case</del> state of things pain of <del><gap/></del> <add>disappointment</add>, strictly<lb/>speaking, true it is, there will not be: pain of regret however<lb/>there will be: and to a certain quantity of pain of disappointment<lb/>the pain of regret will be equivalent.</p>   
<head>1829 May 10 +<lb/>Petitions</head> <!-- numbers in pencil --> <p>10<lb/><note>Dispatch Court</note><lb/>(4 <note>&sect;. Benefits</note></p> <p><del>Decided at the first interview might reasonably be expected<lb/><unclear>as to the</unclear> <gap/> and question following</del></p> <p><note>13<lb/>Example Will-interpretation<lb/>suit</note></p> <p>Take for example the case where the loss to one party the<lb/>given to another turns upon the interpretation put upon a will<lb/>Suppose no <add>ground</add> rules <del>laid down</del> in the <add>Equity</add> book for the course to be taken<lb/>on the occasion of an interpretation to be put upon a will.<lb/>what would have been the consequence? that, on the occasion of<lb/>each individual will, supposing the intention of the testator was to<lb/>be contrary to law, the sole question of the judge would have been<lb/>what was actually the intention of <del><gap/></del> <add>that</add> <unclear>same</unclear> testator whereas<lb/>the general rule having been laid down <del>the question</del> and on<lb/>the individual occasion in question compliance given to it,<lb/>the <del>question</del> standard conformed to will have been &#x2014; not the intention<lb/>of the testator, but the meaning of the rule.  Things being<lb/>in this state deciding according to the rule the Commissioner will<lb/>decide in a manner most pleasing to most audiences to the happiness<lb/>of learned Lords and Gentlemen.  But, deciding according to<lb/>the intention of the testator he will decide in a manner most<lb/>conducive to the happiness of <del><gap/></del> of every body else: for <del>be</del> of the<lb/>course he takes the tendency will be to exclude all <del>who are</del> the<lb/>fear of the frustration of their wishes as expressed by their last wills,<lb/>whereas by deciding otherwise than according to such intention, the<lb/>tendency of the course he takes will be to give to an indefinite<lb/>extent birth to that same fear.</p> <p><del><gap/></del> In this <del>case</del> state of things pain of <del>regret</del> <add>disappointment</add>, strictly<lb/>speaking, true it is, there will not be: pain of regret however<lb/>there will be: and to a certain quantity of pain of disappointment<lb/>the pain of regret will be equivalent.</p>   






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 10:16, 28 July 2023

Click Here To Edit

1829 May 10 +
Petitions

10
Dispatch Court
(4 §. Benefits

Decided at the first interview might reasonably be expected
as to the and question following

13
Example Will-interpretation
suit

Take for example the case where the loss to one party the
given to another turns upon the interpretation put upon a will
Suppose no ground rules laid down in the Equity book for the course to be taken
on the occasion of an interpretation to be put upon a will.
what would have been the consequence? that, on the occasion of
each individual will, supposing the intention of the testator was to
be contrary to law, the sole question of the judge would have been
what was actually the intention of that same testator whereas
the general rule having been laid down the question and on
the individual occasion in question compliance given to it,
the question standard conformed to will have been — not the intention
of the testator, but the meaning of the rule. Things being
in this state deciding according to the rule the Commissioner will
decide in a manner most pleasing to most audiences to the happiness
of learned Lords and Gentlemen. But, deciding according to
the intention of the testator he will decide in a manner most
conducive to the happiness of of every body else: for be of the
course he takes the tendency will be to exclude all who are the
fear of the frustration of their wishes as expressed by their last wills,
whereas by deciding otherwise than according to such intention, the
tendency of the course he takes will be to give to an indefinite
extent birth to that same fear.

In this case state of things pain of regret disappointment, strictly
speaking, true it is, there will not be: pain of regret however
there will be: and to a certain quantity of pain of disappointment
the pain of regret will be equivalent.




Identifier: | JB/081/136/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-05-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

13

Box

081

Main Headings

dispatch court bill

Folio number

136

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d10 / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25923

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in